| Date |
Text |
| 2015-06-23 15:34:14 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A 1 - THERE IS AN INCORRECT REFERNECE TO THE |
| | FIRE CODE. |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING |
| | THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER |
| | APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A 5 - THE NEW EXIT DOORS SHALL SWING IN THE |
| | DIRECTION OF EGRESS. PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING: |
| | NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, |
| | OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT |
| | MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A |
| | CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN, |
| | UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS |
| | PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR LEAF IS FULLY |
| | OPEN. |
| | |
| | 3) NO EXIT DOOR SHALL BE LOCKED FROM THE EGRESS SIDE. |
| | ANY AND ALL LOCKING MECHANISMS SHALL BE COMPLAINT WITH |
| | CHAPTER 7 OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. PROVIDE |
| | A DOOR SCHEDULE INCLUDING EXIT AND LATCH HARDWARE. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET E 2.01 - PROVIDE AND EXIT SIGN AT THE SIDE |
| | EXIT DOOR. |
| | |
| | |
