| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-28 13:36:50 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE PLANS SPECIFY THAT THE EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE |
| | ROOF ON THE MAIN HOUSE IS TO BE REPLACED WITH A |
| | CONCRETE TILE ROOF. THE EXISTING ROOF IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | EVALUATED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO |
| | DETERMINE THAT IT IS CAPABLE OF SAFELY SUPPORTING ALL |
| | LOADS, INCLUDING DEAD LOADS, LIVE LOADS AND WINDS |
| | LOADS. FBC - R301.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THE ROOF NOTES FOR THE PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE ON |
| | A-3 INCORRECTLY STATE REPLACE ASPHALT SHINGLES WITH |
| | TILE. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) THE WORK THAT IS BEING DONE TO THE EXISTING BUILDING |
| | INVOLVES RECONFIGURING SPACE AND THE WORK AREA EXCEEDS |
| | 50 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING AREA. THIS CLASSIFIES IT AS |
| | LEVEL 3 ALTERATION PER FBC EXISTING BUILDING CHAPTER 4. |
| | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS REQUIRED TO NOTE THE LEVEL |
| | OF ALTERATION ON THE PLANS PER SECTION 401.4. |
| | |
| | 4) THE VALUE OF THE ALTERATION WORK EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT |
| | OF THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE AND IS |
| | CONSIDERED A RENOVATED BUILDING BY THE 2010 FBC ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. SUBMIT TWO SETS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING THAT THE RENOVATED BUILDING COMPLIES WITH THE |
| | ENERGY CODE. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 401.2 |
| | |
| | 5) THE PLANS SPECIFY A 4 PLY 2 X 12 WOOD BEAM AT THE |
| | OPENING FROM THE DINING ROOM TO THE FAMILY ROOM THAT |
| | WILL SUPPORT THE ALTERED ROOF TRUSSES. SPECIFY THE |
| | FOOTING SIZES AND REINFORCEMENT THAT WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | AT THE LOAD BEARING ENDS OF THIS BEAM. FBC-R301.1 |
| | |
| | 6) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAS THE TWO |
| | #8 SCREW MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT MARKED. THE PLANS |
| | SPECIFY A FOAM-ON TILE APPLICATION AND A PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR AH-160 FOAM ROOF TILE ADHESIVE WAS |
| | SUBMITTED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE INSTALLATION THAT WILL BE |
| | USED. |
| | |
| | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH TERMITE PROTECTION AT THE |
| | PROPOSED GARAGE. FBC - R 318 |
| | |
| | 8) IN DETAIL B ON S-2 THE INTERIOR FOOTING REINFORCING |
| | BARS ARE REQUIRED TO BE LAPPED AT THE CORNERS LIKE THE |
| | OUTSIDE BARS IN ORDER TO BE CONTINUOUS. |
| | |
| | 9) ON SHEET S-2 THE GARAGE FOOTING IS SPECIFIED AS 20" |
| | X 16" IN THE SCHEDULE AND AT SECTION C IT IS 16" X 16" |
| | ,AS WELL AS, 1' 4" (16") X 1' 10" (22"). PLEASE CORRECT |
| | SUCH THAT THE FOOTING SIZES ARE CONSISTENT. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 10) SPECIFY THE MAXIMUM SPACING OF THE VERTICALLY |
| | REINFORCED FILLED CELLS IN THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF THE |
| | PROPOSED GARAGE. FBC - R 609.3.3 |
| | |
| | 11) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF |
| | THE SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
