| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-06 07:55:14 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | THESE THREE COMMENTS ARE REPEAT COMMENTS. PLEASE HAVE |
| | QUALIFIER READ COMMENT LIST AND REVIEW PLAN BEFORE PLAN |
| | IS RESUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT PLANS ARE TO BE REVISED TO SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE (SEE FBC 107). ISSUES CANNOT BE ADDRESSED |
| | THROUGH A RESPONSE LETTER AS THAT IS DISCARDED, NOT A |
| | PART OF THE PERMIT PACKAGE. ALSO COMMENT CANNOT BE |
| | ADDRESSED WITH VERBAL INFORMATION - FOR INSTANCE, I WAS |
| | TOLD THAT THE SOUTHWEST BUILDING WAS A PART OF THE OIL |
| | CHANGE BUSINESS AND HAD NO OFFICE, BUT THE SURVEY AND |
| | AERIALS SHOW AN OFFICE. |
| | |
| | IF QUALIFIER WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE |
| | RESOLUTIONS, PLEASE HAVE QUALIFIER CALL ME TO DISCUSS. |
| | THIS WAS THIRD SUBMITTAL, SAME INFORMATION SUBMITTED, |
| | $50 EACH SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 1. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING THE TWO ACCESSIBLE |
| | SPACES ON THE SOUTH END OF THE PARKING LOT. A PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL IS SHOWN LEADING TO THE RESTAURANT, BUT THIS |
| | LOCATION IS NOT THE SHORTEST ROUTE. |
| | |
| | THE BUILDING IN THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE LOT DOES |
| | NOT APPEAR TO BE SERVED BY ANY ACCESSIBLE SPACES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS BUILDING IS FOR STAFF |
| | ONLY. SURVEY APPEARS TO INCLUDE A NOTE THAT STATES THAT |
| | THIS BUILDING INCLUDES OFFICE SPACE. RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT "THE BUILDING . . . IS A REPAIR SHOP FOR A |
| | COMPANY THAT ONLY STORES THEIR WORK VEHICLES FOR |
| | MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE. THIS AREA IS FOR WORKERS |
| | ONLY." |
| | |
| | AS THERE IS AN OFFICE, IT APPEARS THAT ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR THIS BUILDING (FOR |
| | STAFF/EMPLOYEES OR FOR VISITORS). |
| | |
| | SEE FBC 2010 ACCESSIBLITY 202.3 (ALTERATIONS), 208.2 |
| | (PARKING SPACES), 502 (PARKING SPACES), 206 (ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE). |
| | |
| | THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN DISCUSSED AT LENGTH WITH KRISTINE |
| | FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE. PLEASE HAVE QUALIFIER |
| | CALL ME TO DISCUSS OPTIONS FOR RESOLUTION. A REDLINE |
| | WAS OFFERED IN PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW, BUT WE WERE UNABLE |
| | TO OBTAIN RESOLUTION. |
| | |
| | SEE SECTION FBC ACCESSIBILITY 208.3.1: |
| | |
| | PARKING SPACES COMPLYING WITH 502 THAT SERVE A |
| | PARTICULAR BUILDING OR FACILITY SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE |
| | SHORTEST ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PARKING TO AN ENTRANCE |
| | COMPLYWING WITH 206.4. |
| | |
| | WHERE PARKING SERVES MORE THAN ONE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE, |
| | PARKING SPACES COMPLYING WITH 502 SHALL BE DISPERSED |
| | AND LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES. |
| | |
| | SEE ALSO ADVISORY 208.2: |
| | |
| | THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE |
| | IS TO BE CALCULATED SEPARATELY FOR EACH PARKING |
| | FACILITY; THE REQUIRED NUMBER IS NOT TO BE BASED ON THE |
| | TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IN ALL OF THE |
| | PARKING FACILITIES PROVIDED ON THE SITE. |
| | |
| | REGARDING PREVIOUS ITEM #2, RESPONSE ADDRESSES PARKING |
| | SPACES FOR THE OIL CHANGE BUILDING. AT ISSUE IS THE TWO |
| | ACCESSIBLE SPACES TO THE SOUTH OF THE LOT. BUILDINGS |
| | WHICH SERVE EMPLOYEES ARE NOT EXEMPT FROM |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, ONLY FROM VERTICAL ACCESSIBLITY IN VERY |
| | SPECIFIC CASES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE AND PROVIDE ALL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED. RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT |
| | APPLICANT WILL NOT ADD ADDITIONAL SPACES NOR MOVE THE |
| | NON COMPLIANT SPACES. PLEASE HAVE QUALIFIER CALL ME TO |
| | DISCUSS CODE COMPLIANT OPTIONS. LEAVING TWO NON |
| | COMPLIANT SPACES AND ROUTE TO ONE BUILDING WHILE |
| | LEAVING ANOTHER WITH NO ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS NOT AN |
| | OPTION. IT APPEARS THAT EASIEST RESOLUTION COULD BE TO |
| | ELIMINATE THE TWO NON COMPLIANT ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND |
| | MARKED PATH OF TRAVEL, ADD ONE SPACE ADJACENT TO THE |
| | GENERAL REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE (WITH OFFICE) BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2. THE PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE INDIVIDUAL |
| | TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN IS TO BE INCLUDED |
| | ON THE PLAN, FBC 107. THE COMPANY NAME IS INCLUDED BUT |
| | NO INFORMATION REGARDING THE INDIVIDUAL WHO IS TAKING |
| | RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION AND |
| | RESPONSIBILITY FOR DESIGN. REPEAT COMMENT, NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3. SEE REVIEW #1, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY 208.2.1, THE FOLLOWING USES HAVE |
| | ADDITIONAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS: |
| | |
| | HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT FACILITES |
| | REHABILITATION FACILITIES |
| | OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY FACILITIES |
| | |
| | PLAN IS TO EITHER SHOW LOCATION OF TENANTS WITH ANY OF |
| | THE ABOVE USES OR PLAN IS TO INCLUDE A STATEMENT WHICH |
| | STATES THAT NONE OF THE ABOVE USES (HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT |
| | FACILITIES, REHABILITATION FACILITIES, OUTPATIENT |
| | PHYSICAL THERAPY FACILITIES) ARE AT THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | |
