| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-03 13:43:54 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY BUILDING (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES |
| | ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF |
| | PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY |
| | IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES "PBC STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF |
| | RECEIPT IS ATTACHED". THERE ARE NO COUNTY STAMPED PLANS |
| | AND NO COPY OF PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS ON THE NEW ADDITION. NOTE: THE |
| | ADDITION IS NEW CONSTRUCTION. EVERYTHING IN THE |
| | ADDITION NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT CODE. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | THERE IS A HAND WRITTEN NOTE ON NOA 11-1013.12 |
| | SUBMITTED STATING THAT "PGT WINDOWS SH4000 (RENAMED |
| | SH200)". PROVIDE PROOF THAT WINDOW SERIES SH-4000 WERE |
| | RE-NAMED SH-200. NEED TO VERIFY THAT SERIES 4000 AND |
| | SERIES 200 WINDOWS ARE THE SAME. |
| | |
| | B) HURRICANE STORM SHUTTERS FOR NEW HORIZONTAL SLIDING |
| | WINDOWS AND NEW SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. AND, PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. PLEASE VISIT THE CITY |
| | WEBSITE FOR SAMPLE OF HURRICANE SHUTTERS INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R301.2.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | (1) DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL COVER PAGE OR MIAMI DADE NOA NUMBER. NEED |
| | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL OR MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE |
| | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ROBERT BROWN. |
| | COMPLETE INFORMATION WITH ORIGINAL ENGINEER'S SEAL AND |
| | SIGNATURES WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR HIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | (2) WHY DOOR #3 IS GOING TO HAVE SHUTTERS IF THE NOA |
| | 12-0516.02 SUBMITTED IS LARGE AND SMALL MISSILE IMPACT |
| | RESISTANT? |
| | |
| | (3) INSTALLATION SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-1 STATES THAT |
| | SHUTTERS ARE GOING TO BE INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL DOESN'T ALLOW HORIZONTAL |
| | INSTALLATION ON WOOD FRAMED BUILDINGS. SEE GENERAL NOTE |
| | #7 ON FIRST PAGE OF SHUTTERS DRAWINGS FOR SECTIONS THAT |
| | ALLOW HORIZONTAL INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 3- SPECIFY CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS ON PLANS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R315 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | THERE ARE NO CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHOWN ON THE |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN AND NEED THE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS FOR |
| | ALL BEDROOMS (FRONT AND REAR UNIT). |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET A-1: SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS FOR THE ADDITION NEW |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS ADJACENT TO THE NEW EXTERIOR DOOR. |
| | SEC. R308.4(2) OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 5- TYP. SECTION ON SHEET S-1: |
| | A) SPECIFY CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 |
| | OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD RESPONSE LETTER SAID "THE CEILING IN |
| | THE ADDITION IS NOT FASTENED DIRECTLY TO THE RAFTERS |
| | AND AS SUCH THERE IS CROSS VENTILATION AND R806 CROSS |
| | VENTILATION IS NOT REQUIRED.". THIS IS NOT CORRECT. |
| | CROSS VENTILATION IS REQUIRED OR ENGINEER OF RECORD MAY |
| | DESIGN THE ROOF AS UNVENTED. SEE SEC. R806.4. |
| | |
| | B) COORDINATE SIZE OF BOTTOM PLATE WITH SIZE SPECIFIED |
| | ON THE FOUNDATION ELEVATION S1 ON SAME SHEET. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NOT DONE. |
| | |
| | C) CLARIFY IF THERE IS AN UNDER-FLOOR SPACE. IF SO, |
| | THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R408 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | IT'S AN UNDER-FLOOR SPACE. VENTILATION WAS SPECIFIED. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R408.4 |
| | |
| | D) COORDINATE ATTACHMENT OF 2X8 LEDGER TO THE EXISTING |
| | WALL WITH INFORMATION SHOWN ON FLOOR/WALL FRAMING PLAN. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NOT DONE. |
| | |
| | 6- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. REVISE |
| | VALUATION AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | *** RESPONSE: |
| | NEW VALUATION IS STILL TOO LOW. OVERHEAD AND PROFIT |
| | STILL NEED TO BE CONSIDERED EVEN IF THE OWNER IS THE |
| | GC. PROVIDE A COMPLETE ITEMIZED ESTIMATE FOR ALL THE |
| | SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON PLANS. DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES |
| | ARE TOO LOW ALSO. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR THE NEW SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS ON THE NEW ADDITION. |
| | SEC. R301. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | A TYPICAL WINDOW OPENING WAS PROVIDED BUT IT DOESN'T |
| | MATCH ACTUAL CONDITIONS. REVISED PLANS SHOW A DOOR WITH |
| | 2 WINDOWS ASSEMBLY. PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS |
| | FOR PROPOSED ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 8- NEW COMMENT: SHEET A1 DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY |
| | INFORMATION FOR THE NEW STEPS BY THE NEW ADDITION. |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R311.7.4 |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET. PROVIDE |
| | ORIGINAL DRAWIINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
