| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-02 10:42:53 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | |
| | THE PLANS DO NOT CONTAIN SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE |
| | THE WORK PROPOSED OR SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL |
| | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT |
| | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS |
| | |
| | FBC 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN |
| | UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT |
| | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF |
| | THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL |
| | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT |
| | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED |
| | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM |
| | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, |
| | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE |
| | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, |
| | AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE |
| | OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS |
| | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS |
| | AND ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE |
| | OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. (SEE ALSO |
| | SECTION 107.3.5). |
| | |
| | PLEASE RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING CONFLICTS OR PROVIDE |
| | ADDITIONAL DETAIL IN THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS AS FOLLOWS: |
| | |
| | 1. INCORPORATE SHEET S-0 INTO THE DRAWING SET IF IT IS |
| | INTENDED THAT IT REMAIN PART OF THE SUBMITTAL. |
| | 2. SHEET S-0 INDICATES BUILDING C WILL HAVE NO WORK |
| | DONE ON IT YET SHEET S-1 STATES "NEW WORK IN THIS |
| | BUILDING." |
| | 3. SHEET S-1 FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A SECTION A IS ON SHEET |
| | S-1 BUT NO SECTION A EXIST. |
| | 4. SHEET S-1 INDICATES NEW CONCRETE FLOOR BUT HAS NO |
| | DETAIL. |
| | 5. INSULATION VALUES ON PLAN V. ENERGY SUBMITTAL |
| | CONFLICT. |
| | 6. INADEQUATE DETAILS ARE PROVIDED FOR THE APPLICATION |
| | OF STUCCO. |
| | 7. COVERED PATION FOUNDATION DETAILS LACK BASIC |
| | REEQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| | 8. ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS PROVIDED ARE NOT COORDINATED |
| | WITH PLAN. |
| | |
| | NOTE; IN GENERAL, THIS PLAN IS DEFICIENT TO THE POINT |
| | THAT A REVIEW CANNOT BE EFFICIENTLY PERFORMED. IT IS |
| | SUFFICIENT TO STATE THAT THE ENGINERE OF RECORD SHOULD |
| | FULLY RE-EVALUATE THIS PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS FROM 1ST & 2ND REVIEW ARE BELOW: |
| | |
| | |
| | MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA SHALL BE PROVIDED PER FBC |
| | 107 TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: |
| | |
| | 1.AN ENERGY SUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | 2.PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR WINDOWS & ROOFING FBC 107.3.4 - |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY |
| | FAC RULE 9N-3 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. SPECIFICALLY, PROVIDE ROOFING, |
| | WINDOW, AND DOOR SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | 3.STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR THE NEW OVERHANGS |
| | |
| | 4. OPEN CONDITION WHERE EXISTING SHUTTERS ARE PROPOSED |
| | TO BE REMOVED |
| | |
| | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO |
| | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6710 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
