| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-16 08:10:13 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE SEAL THAT THE ENGINEER JOHN D. HOLT USED ON THE |
| | PLANS IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF |
| | ENGINEERS. THE SEAL IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THE WORD |
| | LICENSE IN LIEU OF THE WORD CERTIFICATE. FAC |
| | 61G15-23.001 |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF A SITE DRAINAGE PLAN THAT SHOWS |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R401.3. |
| | |
| | 3) THE NOTE ON SHEET 2 STATES THAT EXTERIOR FOOTERS AT |
| | FINISH SLABS ARE TO BE 3" CLEAR FROM GRADE. |
| | FBC-R404.1.6 REQUIRES THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS TO |
| | EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 4" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET 3.0 WHICH IS THE PLUMBING RISER PLAN IS |
| | MISSING FROM THE PLANS, BUT IS LISTED IN THE DRAWING |
| | INDEX ON THE COVERSHEET. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) TWO DIFFERENT ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR TILE |
| | WERE SUBMITTED (NOA NO.12-1004.01 & 12-0904.18) AND |
| | NEITHER OF THEM WERE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY FBC 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SPECIFY THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT THAT WILL BE USED |
| | TO INSTALL THE ROOF TILES AND MEET THE REQUIRED |
| | OVERTURN MOMENT. CIRCLE THE SELECTED FASTENER ON THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS. IF AN ADHESIVE IS USED, |
| | SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF IT'S PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT HAVE |
| | BEEN APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. FBC |
| | 107.2.1 AND FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR DOORS THAT ARE 8 FEET IN HEIGHT. ALL OF THE |
| | DOORS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET 4 ARE 96" (8 FT) |
| | IN HEIGHT, EXCEPT DOOR #3 WHICH IS 80" (6' 8") IN |
| | HEIGHT. FBC 107.2.1 AND FBC-R301.2.1 BOTH OF THE |
| | OUTSWING DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR 6' 8" TALL |
| | DOORS. |
| | |
| | 8) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE STRUCTURAL MULLIONS. PROVIDE |
| | TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS |
| | INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS ARE DEFICIENT. THE FL# IS NOT |
| | PROVIDED IN THE DOCUMENTS AND THE MAXIMUM NEGATIVE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE (-60 PSF) IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR ALL OF |
| | THE WINDOWS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET 4. |
| | FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
