| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-30 10:51:58 | |
| | |
| | *****NOTES: |
| | A) THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE BASED ONLY ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL PACKAGE I HAVE IN FRONT OF ME TO DO THE |
| | REVIEW. WHATEVER I AM ASKING FOR IS BECAUSE IS NOT |
| | HERE. |
| | |
| | B) I ALSO NOTICED THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE SET OF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS IN THIS PACKAGE: THE OTHER SET OF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WAS SIGNED OUT ON 7/24/15. THE FOLLOWING ARE |
| | THE NOA'S THAT WE HAVE IN THIS PACKAGE: GARAGE DOOR NOA |
| | 12-0517.16, FRENCH DOORS NOA 14-1117.05, SLIDING GLASS |
| | DOORS NOA 14-0128.11, MULLIONS NOA 14-1105.01, FIXED |
| | WINDOWS NOA 13-0502.03 AND HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS |
| | NOA 11-1114.04. THEREFORE, WE NEED THE SECOND SET |
| | RE-SUBMITTED. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SIGNED |
| | OUT AND THE PRODUCT APPROVALS LISTED BELOW NEED TO BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN. SEC R401.3 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 2- SOIL TEST REPORT IS INCOMPLETE. PROVIDE SOIL TEST |
| | REPORT WITH ALL THE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 1803.6 FBC-2010. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) MAHOGANY ENTRY DOOR SIZE AND ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | B) ROOF TILE. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | C) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR LISTED ADHESIVE. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | D) PEEL & STICK CONCRETE ROOF TILE UNDERLAYMENT AS |
| | SPECIFIED ON DETAIL D1 OF SHEET A801. (REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | E) PRECAST LINTELS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | |
| | 4- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | IN WRITING (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: REVIEW AND |
| | APPROVE ALSO ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE ALREADY |
| | SUBMITTED. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | |
| | 5- CLARIFY WHY THERE IS ANOTHER ENGINEER (NOT THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD) SUBMITTING A "WINDOW & DOOR |
| | INSTALLATION?. ALSO, THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE DIFFERENT |
| | THAN THOSE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. WHICH |
| | ONE IS THE ONE WITH THE CORRECT DESIGN PRESSURES? AND, |
| | THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS MULLIONS ARE NOT CLEAR |
| | (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL?). SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | |
| | 6- CLEARLY IDENTIFY MULLION SIZE FOR OPENINGS #108, |
| | #109 AND #110 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL MULLIONS. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | |
| | 7- TRUSS PACKAGE: (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED) |
| | A) TRUSS PACKAGE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. 61G15-31.003. |
| | THE COVER PAGE IS MISSING THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | INFORMATION AND EACH INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWING NEEDS THE |
| | TRUSS ENGINEER'S INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE BEFORE SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | NOTE: TRUSS PACKAGE DOESN'T NEED TO BE RE-SUBMITTED TO |
| | THIS OFFICE NOW. ON RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS, THE |
| | CONTRACTOR MAY DELIVER THE REVISED TRUSS PACKAGE TO THE |
| | INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS. (REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | RESPONSE LETTER NOT SUBMITTED. REVIEW TOOK LONGER |
| | LOOKING FOR THE INFORMATION). |
| | ***PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED DRAWING. |
| | SUBMITT OLD COPY FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
