| Date |
Text |
| 2015-06-09 12:46:49 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW; NEW STRUCTURAL SHEET SUBMITTED, LACKING THE |
| | NUMBER OF FASTENERS REQUIRED (SEE FIRST PLAN REVIEW): |
| | |
| | 1. OK |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE A VERIFIABLE COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS |
| | JOB, FBC 109. VALUE TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | OVERHEAD, PROFIT, ENGINEERING. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. VALUE IS UNREASONABLY LOW. |
| | 3RD REVIEW, THE VERIFIABLE CONTRACT REQUESTED WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | 4TH REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3. REPEAT COMMENT FOR THIS ENGINEER: |
| | |
| | SIGN FASTENING SPECIFICATION TO INCLUDE NUMBER OF |
| | FASTENERS REQUIRED OR FASTENING PATTERN, FBC 1609. |
| | |
| | A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - THE PLANS PROVIDED ARE NOT IDENTICAL. ONE |
| | STRUCTURAL SHEET IN ONE SET HAS BEEN MODIFIED, THE |
| | OTHER HAS NOT. HAVE ENGINEER INCORPORATE THE STRUCTURAL |
| | INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN. |
| | 3RD REVIW - CORRECTION WAS HAND WRITTEN ON THE PLAN. |
| | THE STRUCTURAL INFORMATION IS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO |
| | THE DRAWING PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER. |
| | 4TH REVIEW - A NEW SHEET WAS PROVIDED, BUT WITHOUT THE |
| | NUMBER OF FASTENERS WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY HANDWRITTEN ON |
| | THE PLAN BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE ENGINEER. |
| | INCORPORATE THIS INFORMATION INTO THE ENGINEER'S PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4. WHEN COMPLETING THE RESUBMITTAL FORM, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | CORRECT INFORMATION - "CONTRACTOR" SHOULD BE THE |
| | CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE CORRECT |
| | NAME WILL RESULT IN PLANS BEING FILED INCORRECTLY AND |
| | MAY RESULT IN PLANS GOING TEMPORARILY MISSING. |
| | |
| | 5. IF THE NEXT SUBMITTAL IS NOT CORRECT, A 4X FEE WILL |
| | BE ASSESSED TO THIS PERMIT AS PER FS553. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, COLLATE THE PLANS SO THERE ARE TWO |
| | IDENTICAL SETS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. OLD SHEETS ARE TO |
| | REMAIN IN THE PACKAGE AND SHOULD BE MARKED "VOID". |
| | 3RD REVIEW - PLANS ARE NOT IDENTICAL. ONE SET HAS A |
| | PAGE WHICH IS LACKING FROM THE OTHER SET. |
| | 4TH REVIEW - PLANS ARE NOT IDENTICAL; NEW SHEET NOT |
| | INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN. |
| | |
