| Date |
Text |
| 2015-04-17 18:05:29 | SUBMITTAL BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: 2010 |
| | |
| | 1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) SLIDING GLASS DOORS SIZES SPECIFIED FOR D107 DOORS |
| | ON DOOR SCHEDULE. NOA 12-0130.13 SUBMITTED DOESN'T |
| | INCLUDE D107 DOOR SIZE AND WAS ALREADY APPROVED WITH |
| | THE ORIGINAL PACKAGE. WINDOOR INCORPORATED DRAWING |
| | #08-02265 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE AN NOA NUMBER OR |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER. IF THERE IS NOT AN |
| | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY |
| | FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCEDURE. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOW SIZES FOR W5, W6, W7 AND W8 WINDOWS SHOWN ON |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE. AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: |
| | (1) FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL13252-R2 SUBMITTED IS |
| | MISSING DRAWINGS 09 OF 17 THRU 17 OF 17. (2) CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY WINDOW AND MULLION SIZE ON FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FL13252-R2 AND FL14218-R3 SUBMITTED TO |
| | COMPARE WITH ARCHITECT WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A9. |
| | |
| | 2- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3- FLAT ROOF INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NOA'S SUBMITTED. ONE IS FROM |
| | GAF AND THE OTHER ONE IS FROM TAMKO. THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD APPROVED THE TAMKO . COORDINATE INFORMATION AS |
| | REQUIRED ANDS SUBMIT ONLY ONE NOA. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO |
| | BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. |
| | R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | C) ENGINEER TO REVISE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED; |
| | (1) BUILDING EXPOSURE IS "D" NOT "B". REVISE THE |
| | BUILDING EXPOSURE AND DESIGN PRESSURES AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R301.2.1.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | (2)IDENTIFY SELECTED APPROVED ASSEMBLY. SEC. R301.1. |
| | (3) THE MINIMUM FASTENER SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS |
| | THAN 4 IN. O.C.. SEE RAS 117 SEC. 8.1 AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | (4) IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS A TYPO ON THE FRONT PAGE OF |
| | THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. ENGINEER IS MAKING |
| | REFERENCE TO AXCE 7-10. IT SHOULD BE ASCE 7-10. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- SOIL TEST REPORT TO HAVE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FL. ST.. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
