| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-06 08:58:20 | 8/6/15 RECEIVED ANOTHER E-MAIL FROM SAM MALO REGARDING |
| | THE ROOF VENTILATION ITEM #11: |
| | |
| | ****RESPONSE: |
| | THERE IS NO INFORMATION FOR THE CROSS VENTILATION FOR |
| | THE FLAT ROOFS. ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS SHOWN |
| | ONLY ADDRESSES THE PITCHED ROOFS. ARE THE PITCHED ROOFS |
| | INTERCONNECTED SO THE AIR FLOW FROM ONE ROOF TO THE |
| | OTHER?. SEE AREA WHERE THE EXISTING MAIN ROOF RECEIVES |
| | THE NEW ROOF FOR THE GARAGE ADDITION. IS THE ROOF |
| | SHEATHING OF THE EXISTING MAIN ROOF GOING TO BE REMOVED |
| | OR THE NEW ROOF TRUSSES ARE LAYING ON THE ROOF |
| | SHEATHING?. PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL SHOWING THE |
| | PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AT THIS AREA. THE CODE |
| | REQUIREMENT IS TO PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION FOR ENTIRE |
| | ROOF INCLUDING THE FLAT ROOFS. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. CAREFULLY REVIEW THE ROOF PLAN |
| | WITH HIM, ADDRESS THE CROSS VENTILATION CODE ISSUE AND |
| | RESUBMIT REVISED PLANS. I APOLOGIZE BUT NO MORE PARTIAL |
| | REVIEWS WILL BE DONE UNTIL PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR FULL |
| | REVIEW. TO BE FAIR TO THE OTHERS, I NEED TO DO THE |
| | REVIEW ON PLANS THAT ARE ALREADY SUBMITTED AND WAITING |
| | ON LINE. I THINK MY COMMENT IS VERY CLEAR. IF YOU THINK |
| | YOU NEED MORE CLARIFICATION ON THIS ISSUE, PLEASE |
| | CONTACT STEVE KENNEDY, MY SUPERVISOR AT (561)805-6712 |
| | OF [email protected]. |
| | SINCERELY, |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE DONE FOR A |
| | PROPERTY IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION ON |
| | TOP OF FORM AS REQUIRED, AND, INCLUDE THE BUILDER'S |
| | NAME. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | REVIEW OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE DONE WHEN |
| | CORRECT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED. |
| | ***NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | COORDINATED WITH PLANS AND ALL THE FORMS ARE COMPLETE |
| | AND SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | 2- THE PROJECT NAME SHOWN ON PLANS SUBMITTED IS |
| | CHAMBERS RESIDENCE. THIS DOESN'T MATCH THE NAME OF THE |
| | OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | ***RESPONSE: SOME SHEETS STILL HAVE THE WRONG NAME. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET 3.0 SPECIFIES REMOVAL OF WINDOWS AND DOORS. |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS |
| | (SPECIALLY THE BEDROOM WINDOWS) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | ****RESPONSE: CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE |
| | EXISTING WINDOW AND ACTUAL SIZE OF THE PROPOSED WINDOW. |
| | SIZES SHOWN ON SHEET 6.0 AND WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET |
| | 5.0 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. |
| | (EGRESS WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T |
| | COMPLY WITH EGRESS). |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) WOOD ENTRY DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1 |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR |
| | FINISH. IS NOT A SOLID WOOD DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR WOOD DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO MATCH |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B) DINING ROOM EXTERIOR DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE. |
| | ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1 |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR |
| | FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO |
| | MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C) STORAGE DOUBLE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1 |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR |
| | FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO |
| | MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | D) MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY |
| | DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 |
| | OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED |
| | FL1654-R9 WAS REVISED. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL REVISION #14. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY |
| | DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES. |
| | (NOTE: MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR THE 2010 |
| | CODE VERSION). |
| | |
| | E) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | FRAMING PLANS AND ALL DETAILS. NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING |
| | THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. THERE WAS |
| | ONLY ONE LETTER SUBMITTED FROM SIMPSON-STRONG-TIE. |
| | (THAT'S NOT A PRODUCT APPROVAL. THE LETTER DOENS'T |
| | APPLY TO THIS JOB AND IS NOT VALID WITHOUT COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS). |
| | |
| | K) HARDIE BOARD SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | ***RESPONSE: REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO, |
| | WHILE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SPECIFY HARDIE SIDING. REVISE |
| | ALL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | L) HARDIE SOFFIT AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS/SECTIONS. |
| | ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | M) CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING MIAMI-DADE NOA 11-1114.04 FOR |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS. WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T |
| | SPECIFY THIS TYPE OF WINDOW. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | N) NEW COMMENT. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE RIDGE |
| | VENT AND GOOSE-NECK VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER |
| | ON SHEET 4.3. |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS DON'T HAVE THE ENGINEER'S REVIEW STAMP OR ANY |
| | OTHER METHOD THAT SHOWS IN WRITING THAT THE ENGINEER |
| | REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NEED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AS REVIEWED). |
| | |
| | 11- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR PITCHED AND FLAT ROOFS. IF |
| | DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTIC , THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R806.4 |
| | ***RESPONSE: ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET 4.3 ONLY |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE PITCHED ROOFS. THERE IS NOT |
| | INFORMATION FOR THE FLAT ROOF. ALSO, PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIOS FOR THE RIDGE VENT AND |
| | GOOSE-NECK VENTS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CROSS |
| | VENTILATION AND SIZES OF ALL VENTS. |
| | |
| | 12- REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO FINISH. STUCCO |
| | THICKNESS IS 7/8" MIN NOT 3/4". REVISE ALL DETAILS AS |
| | REQUIRED. TABLE R702.1(1). |
| | |
| | 13- WOOD TRUSS DESIGN LOADS ON SHEET 4.3: SPECIFY THE |
| | ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | ***RESPONSE: REVISE LOADS ON SHEET 4.0. THERE IS A PULL |
| | DOWN STAIR. SEE NOTE "G" OF TABLE R301.5. |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ****PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET.. SUMIT |
| | OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
