| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-28 07:12:34 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | |
| | THE SUBMITTAL IS THROUGHLY CONFUSING. THE APPLICATION |
| | DESCRIPTION AND NEWEST PLAN DO NOT MATCH, THE SUBMITTAL |
| | CONSIST OF PLANS FROM MORE THAN ONE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL. ONE HAS A SITE PLAN, THE NEW ONE DOES |
| | NOT. THERE IS ENGINEERING FROM A THIRD DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL SUPPLIED FOR WINDOW AND DOOR DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES YET THE BUILDING SHOWING THE AREA OF |
| | INSTALLATION IS SIGNED AND SEAL BY SOMEONE ELSE. A |
| | SHUTTER INSTALLATION SCHEDULE HAS BEEN PROVIDE BUT LIST |
| | THE DOOR AND WINDOW PRODUCT ON IT. WHY IS THAT |
| | SUPPLIED. ARE WINDOWS ON THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE PROPOSED |
| | TO BE REPLACED? ALTHOUGH THE NEW PLAN FOR THE ACCESSORY |
| | BUILDING IS LABLED "STORAGE" IT PRESENTS AS LIVING AREA |
| | AND ACCORDINGLY IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY AND THE |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS STILL APPLY. |
| | |
| | THE VALUATION FOR THE PROPOSED WORK IS LOW AND THE |
| | SCOPE OF WORK IS UNCLEAR. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE |
| | CLAIMED VALUE OR REVISE VALUE AND PROVIDE A FULL SCOPE |
| | OF WORK. |
| | FBC 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING |
| | PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE |
| | TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, |
| | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, |
| | RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, |
| | MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY |
| | LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST |
| | PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS |
| | SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | FBC 107 - PROVIDE A SURVEY WITH FLOOD DESIGNATION. |
| | |
| | FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE |
| | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BYFAC RULE 9N-3 REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | SPECIFICALLY, PROVIDE WINDOW, WINDOW MULLION, AND DOOR |
| | SUBMITTALS. PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE APPLICABLE |
| | OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING APPLIES TO THE GARAGE CONVERSION TO |
| | LIVING SPACE: |
| | |
| | PER TABLE 101.4.1 NONEXEMPT EXISTING BUILDINGS, NOT |
| | PREVIOUSLY CONDITIONED PERMITTED BEFORE MARCH 1979 AND |
| | OCCUPANCY TYPE CHANGE MINIMUM EFFICIENCY LEVELS SHALL |
| | BE MET FOR COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED ENVELOPE: SECTION |
| | 402, WQUIPMENT: SECTION 403, LIGHTING: SECTION 404. |
| | FBC 107.3.5.1.6 ENERGY CALCULATIONS - PROVIDE AN ENERGY |
| | SUBMITTAL COMPLIANT WITH FBC-E 103 |
| | |
| | FBCR TABLE R302.1 EXTERIOR WALLS; MINIMUM |
| | FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING WITHIN 3 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE |
| | IS: 1 HOUR-TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 119 OR UL |
| | 263 WITH EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES. PROVIDE DETAILS TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FORGOING. FOR THE REAR |
| | AND WEST WALLS. |
| | |
| | FBC 107. PROVIDE FRAMING DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION |
| | OF THE NEW WINDOW AND NEW DOOR. |
| | |
| | A NEW WALL SECTION IS PROVIDED, BUT THE PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT STILL APPLIES AS FOLLOWS: |
| | A TYPICAL BEARING WALL DETAIL IS PROVIDED. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY WHY THE DETAIL IS PROVIDED AND WHAT WORK |
| | DEPICTED THERE IS PROPOSED AS NEW. |
| | |
| | A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED DUE TO THE LACK |
| | OF CLARITY OF THE SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN |
| | UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT |
| | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF |
| | THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL |
| | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT |
| | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED |
| | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM |
| | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, |
| | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE |
| | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, |
| | AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE |
| | OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS |
| | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE IF THESE COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRES PROPERLY |
| | ON THE 4TH REVIEW, A PENALTY WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | |
| | |
| | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO |
| | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6710 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO |
| | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6710 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
