| Date |
Text |
| 2015-04-26 08:17:57 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT:15030954 |
| | ADD: 400 N. FLAGLER SUITE: 2305 |
| | CONT: MARYJULI |
| | TEL: (561)386-6032 |
| | E-MAIL: |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2015 |
| | ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED |
| | ELECTRONICALLY |
| | UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECT DOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE |
| | THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| | 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED |
| | NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| | 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE |
| | REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| | 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT |
| | TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES |
| | AVAILABLE |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | DATE: SUN. APRIL 26/ 2015 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | NOTICE: CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES STATES |
| | THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE A FEE OF FOUR |
| | TIMES THE FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | (3) OR MORE TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO CORRECT A |
| | CODE VIOLATION. THIS CAN BE PUT ON EITHER THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL AND OR THE CONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2) 2ND REQUEST. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE |
| | 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | 3) 2ND REQUEST. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HAS NOT REVIEWED |
| | THE ENGINEERS WIND DESIGN CRITERIA AND PRESSURES FOR |
| | THIS PROJECT. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | WITH THE NEW WINDOWS AND SLIDDING GLASS DOORS THE PLANS |
| | DO NOT PROVIDE THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA; |
| | WIND DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.1 DETERMINATION OF WIND DESIGN- |
| | CHAPTER 6 OF ASCE 7-10. |
| | 1609.3 BASIC WIND SPEED FIGURE 1609.A-C |
| | 1609.3 WIND SPEED CONVERSION |
| | 3.1) THE BASIC WIND SPEED, VU, SHALL BE DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 1609.3.1 & ASCE 7-10 |
| | 3.2) AN IMPORTANCE FACTOR, FIGURE 1609 A-C, ASCE 7-10. |
| | 3.3) AN EXPOSURE CATEGORY SHALL BE DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 1609.4 & ASCE 7-10 |
| | 3.4) A HEIGHT AND EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT COEFFICIENT, * |
| | SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM TABLE 1609.7.2. ASCE 7-10. |
| | 3.5) COMPONENTS & CLADDING PRESSURES POSITIVE & |
| | NEGATIVE TABLE 1609.2(2) . |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REQUEST. PLEASE NOTE THAT PROFLEX 90 DOES NOT |
| | HAVE ANY TESTING THAT MEETS THE CURRENT CODE FOR SOUND |
| | UNDER THE (2) SOUND REQUIREMENTS ASTM E-90 AND ASTM |
| | E-492. THEY DO PASS THE FLAME SPREAD REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | ASTM-E-84. |
| | |
| | THE SUBMITTED REPORT FOR PROFLEX MSC 90 ASTM E-492/ 90 |
| | PAGE 3 OF 4 INDICATES A IIC RATING OF 68 . PAGE (2) OF |
| | THE REPORT IT DESCRIBES THE FLOOR AS A 8" SLAB, AN |
| | ENGINEER WOULD HAVE TO VERIFY SLAB THICKNESS. THE OTHER |
| | ISSUE WITH THIS REPORT IS THE REST WAS CONDUCTED WITH A |
| | SUSPENDED CEILING , 5/8 TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD AND A 10 |
| | INCH PLENUM WITH 3 1/2 INCHES OF FIBERGLASS INSULATION. |
| | TEST REPORTS ARE TO BE TESTED WITH NO DROP CEILING |
| | SINCE THERE IS NO CONTINUAL DROP CEILING OVER THE WHOLE |
| | CEILING. |
| | |
| | THE SAME ISSUE ARE WITH THE PROFLEX MSC 90 REPORT |
| | TESTED UNDER ASTM E-90, PAGES 3 OF 4 LIST A STC RATING |
| | OF STC= 72. THE REPORT IT DESCRIBES THE FLOOR AS A 8" |
| | SLAB, AN ENGINEER WOULD HAVE TO VERIFY SLAB THICKNESS. |
| | THE OTHER ISSUE WITH THIS REPORT IS THE REST WAS |
| | CONDUCTED WITH A SUSPENDED CEILING , 5/8 TYPE X GYPSUM |
| | BOARD AND A 10 INCH PLENUM WITH 3 1/2 INCHES OF |
| | FIBERGLASS INSULATION. TEST REPORTS ARE TO BE TESTED |
| | WITH NO DROP CEILING SINCE THERE IS NO CONTINUAL DROP |
| | CEILING OVER THE WHOLE CEILING. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM THE 1ST REVIEW ON THIS CODE ISSUE: |
| | SUBMITTED IN WITH THE PLANS IS DOCUMENTS FOR FLOOR |
| | INSULATION PROFLEX 90 FLOOR INSULATION, PLEASE NOTE |
| | THERE WERE A FEW PERMITS ISSUED WITH THIS PRODUCT BUT |
| | IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THIS REPORT WITH A |
| | INSULATION CLASS OF IIC 72 IS WITH A DROPPED CEILING. |
| | THE PRODUCT IS TO BE TESTED WITH FLOOR TILE, THIN-SET, |
| | INSULATION MATERIAL AND 6 INCH THICK CONCRETE SLAB. SEE |
| | THE FOLLOWING CODE REQUIREMENTS, THE FULL TEST |
| | DOCUMENTS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4A) FBC-B 2010 1207.3 STRUCTURE-BORNE SOUND. |
| | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS OR |
| | BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC OR SERVICE AREA |
| | WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN IMPACT INSULATION |
| | CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD |
| | TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492. |
| | |
| | 4B) FBC-B 2010 1207.2 1207.2 AIR-BORNE SOUND. |
| | WALLS, PARTITIONS AND FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES |
| | SEPARATING DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM |
| | PUBLIC OR SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION |
| | CLASS (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) |
| | FOR AIR-BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM |
| | E 90. |
| | |
| | 4C) FLAME SPREAD- FBC-B 2010 603.1.2 EXCEPTION 2. |
| | INSULATION INSTALLED BETWEEN A FINISHED FLOOR AND SOLID |
| | DECKING WITHOUT INTERVENING AIRSPACE SHALL BE ALLOWED |
| | TO HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 200. |
| | |
| | FLAME SPREAD INDEX. A COMPARATIVE MEASURE, EXPRESSED AS |
| | A DIMENSIONLESS NUMBER, DERIVED FROM VISUAL |
| | MEASUREMENTS OF THE SPREAD OF FLAME VERSUS TIME FOR A |
| | MATERIAL TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 OR UL 723. |
| | |
| | 703.4 NONCOMBUSTIBILITY TESTS. |
| | THE TESTS INDICATED IN SECTIONS 703.4.1 AND 703.4.2 |
| | SHALL SERVE AS CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING |
| | MATERIALS AS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 602.2, 602.3 AND |
| | 602.4 IN TYPE I, II, III AND IV CONSTRUCTION. THE TERM |
| | ?NONCOMBUSTIBLE? DOES NOT APPLY TO THE FLAME SPREAD |
| | CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERIOR FINISH OR TRIM MATERIALS. A |
| | MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE CLASSIFIED AS A NONCOMBUSTIBLE |
| | BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IF IT IS SUBJECT TO AN |
| | INCREASE IN COMBUSTIBILITY OR FLAME SPREAD BEYOND THE |
| | LIMITATIONS HEREIN ESTABLISHED THROUGH THE EFFECTS OF |
| | AGE, MOISTURE OR OTHER ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 703.4.1 ELEMENTARY MATERIALS. |
| | MATERIALS REQUIRED TO BE NONCOMBUSTIBLE SHALL BE TESTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 136. |
| | |
| | 703.4.2 COMPOSITE MATERIALS. |
| | MATERIALS HAVING A STRUCTURAL BASE OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE |
| | MATERIAL AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 703.4.1 WITH A SURFACING NOT MORE THAN 0.125 INCH (3.18 |
| | MM) THICK THAT HAS A FLAME SPREAD INDEX NOT GREATER |
| | THAN 50 WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 OR UL |
| | 723 SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE AS NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE |
| | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
