| Date |
Text |
| 2015-06-17 12:40:40 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- SHEET S-1: |
| | A) ALL WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS ARE MISSING THE |
| | STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS. SPECIFY ALL STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTIONS FOR ALL WOOD STUDS, WOOD COLUMNS, FLOOR |
| | JOISTS TO NEW STEEL BEAM, ETC. . SEC. R301.1 AND R601.2 |
| | OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 2- SECTION 5/S-1: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TYPE OF |
| | STEEL BEAM. SQUARE BEAM? THICKNESS, ETC. SEC 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) HOW MANY BOLTS ARE REQUIRED ON EACH STEEL ANGLE THAT |
| | IS SUPPORTING THE STEEL BEAM? SEC 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) STEEL ANGLE IS MISSING THE DIMENSION FOR ONE SIDE. |
| | SEC 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TYPE OF |
| | FOUNDATION BEAM THAT WILL SUPPORT NEW STEEL BEAM. SEC |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3- SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS (SPECIALLY |
| | THE BEDROOM WINDOWS) AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED |
| | WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 604 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) ENTRY DOOR. PROVIDE 2 COPIES FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL15255.5. ONLY ONE SUBMITTED. ALSO, IDENTIFY |
| | WHICH DOOR IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | B) INSWING SIDE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS BY THE KITCHEN |
| | AREA. NONE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | C) FRENCH DOOR. PROVIDE 2 COPIES. ONLY ONE WAS |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | D) WINDOW MULLIONS. PROVIDE 2 COPIES. ONLY ONE |
| | SUBMITTED. AND, CLEARLY SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | E) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. PROVIDE 2 COPIES. ONLY ONE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | F) ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON WALL SECTIONS |
| | ON SHEET S-1. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NUMBER AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. OR |
| | LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO EACH |
| | SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED BY THE NEW DESIGNER OF RECORD NOT FERNANDO |
| | GOMEZ-PINA, P.E. |
| | |
| | 6- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED; |
| | A) NEED INFORMATION FROM PERSON COMPLETING THE FORM. |
| | SEC 405.4 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B) NEED OWNER/AGENT SIGNATURE AND DATE AT BOTTOM OF |
| | FORM. SEC. 103.2.3.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C) COMPLETE ALL THE INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM,INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME AND BUILDER. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | D) ITEM #1 IS INCORRECT. THIS IS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION. |
| | SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) ITEM #8 IS INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS THERE IS |
| | NOT SLAB ON GRADE. |
| | |
| | F) ITEM # 9 IS INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS THERE ARE |
| | NOT CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS. |
| | |
| | G) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 5 IS INCORRECT. |
| | THERE IS NOT BARREL TILE ON THIS HOUSE. |
| | |
| | H) DOOR TYPE ON PAGE 3 OF 5 IS INCORRECT. THERE ARE NOT |
| | WOOD DOORS. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | NOTE: THIS IS A CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC HOUSE. ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED. BUT, IF THEY ARE |
| | SUBMITTED, THEY NEED TO BE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
