| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-24 13:59:26 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) FBC 107.3.5.3 - PROVIDE WIND DESIGN LOADS/DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES PURSUANT TO FBC-R301.2. THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY |
| | FOR THIS PROJECT IS SPECIFIED AS 'B' AND IT IS EXPOSURE |
| | CATEGORY 'C'. FBC-R301.2.1.4 |
| | |
| | 2) THE 34-5 SH WINDOW ( MARK #8 ) ON A1-DL IS AN EGRESS |
| | WINDOW, ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT SPECIFIED AS SUCH IN THE |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 3) R803.2.3.1 SHEATHING FASTENINGS. |
| | WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL BE FASTENED TO |
| | ROOF FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS AT 6 INCHES ON |
| | CENTER AT EDGES AND 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE |
| | FRAMING. RING-SHANK NAILS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING |
| | MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: |
| | |
| | 1. 0.113 INCH NOMINAL SHANK DIAMETER. |
| | |
| | 2. RING DIAMETER OF 0.012 OVER SHANK DIAMETER. |
| | |
| | 3. 16 TO 20 RINGS PER INCH. |
| | |
| | 4. 0.280 INCH FULL ROUND HEAD DIAMETER. |
| | |
| | 5. 2 INCH NAIL LENGTH. |
| | |
| | WHERE ROOF FRAMING WITH A SPECIFIC GRAVITY, 0.42 < G < |
| | 0.49 IS USED, SPACING OF RING-SHANK FASTENERS SHALL BE |
| | 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN NAILING ZONE 3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | FIGURE R803.2.3.1 WHERE VASD AS DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R301.2.1.3 IS 130 MPH OR |
| | GREATER. |
| | |
| | 4) R401.4 SOIL TESTS. WHERE QUANTIFIABLE DATA CREATED |
| | BY ACCEPTED SOIL SCIENCE METHODOLOGIES INDICATE |
| | EXPANSIVE, COMPRESSIBLE, SHIFTING OR OTHER QUESTIONABLE |
| | SOIL CHARACTERISTICS ARE LIKELY TO BE PRESENT, THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER TO REQUIRE A |
| | SOIL TEST TO DETERMINE THE SOIL'S CHARACTERISTICS AT A |
| | PARTICULAR LOCATION. THIS TEST SHALL BE DONE BY AN |
| | APPROVED AGENCY USING AN APPROVED METHOD. SUBMIT TWO |
| | COPIES OF A SIGNED AN SEALED SUB-SURFACE SOIL |
| | INVESTIGATION REPORT. |
| | |
| | 5) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R318.1 FOR TERMITE |
| | PROTECTION. |
| | |
| | 6) THE NOTE ON SHEET A2-DL, " FILLED CELL W/1#5 VERT @ |
| | 72" O.C. MAXIMUM EXCEPT WHERE NOTED TYP." IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | THE ARROW IS POINTING TO THE 2 HOUR RATED FIRE WALL. |
| | THE SPACING OF THE FILLED CELLS IN THIS WALL ARE MORE |
| | THAN 9 FEET. CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 7) THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE AN ATTACHMENT DETAIL FOR |
| | THE LEDGER THAT IS CARRYING THE FLOOR TRUSSES THAT ARE |
| | PERPENDICULAR TO THE 2 HOUR FIRE WALL THAT IS SHOWN ON |
| | THE 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN ON A2-DL. FBC-R301.1 |
| | |
| | 8) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R312.3, ON THE STAIR |
| | SECTION ON D2, WHICH REQUIRES THE TRIANGULAR OPENINGS |
| | FORMED BY THE RISER, TREAD AND BOTTOM RAIL OF A GUARD |
| | TO REJECT THE PASSAGE OF A SPHERE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER. |
| | |
| | 9) ON THE OPTIONAL PATIO PLAN ON SHEET A12, PROVIDE |
| | ATTACHMENT DETAILS FOR THE TRUSS TO BEAM AND OUTLOOKERS |
| | TO RAKE BEAM CONNECTIONS. SPECIFY THE ROOF SLOPE. |
| | SPECIFY THE FOOTER FOR THE SINGLE REINFORCED FILLED |
| | CELL THAT IS AGAINST THE EXTERIOR TOWNHOUSE WALL AND |
| | THE ATTACHMENT OF THE TRUSS TOP CORD TO THIS WALL. |
| | SPECIFY THE ATTACHEMENTS OF THE BEAMS, WALLS AND |
| | FOOTINGS TO THE MAIN STRUCTURE. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 10) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE OVERHANG DETAIL AT THE |
| | GABLE RAKE BEAMS SHOWING ALL CONNECTIONS. FBC-R301.1 |
| | DETAIL 11/S6 IS SPECIFIED ON A2-BR, HOWEVER, IT IS |
| | BLANK. |
| | |
| | 11) SPECIFY THE ATTACHMENT METHOD THAT WILL BE USED TO |
| | INSTALL THE CONCRETE ROOF TILE AND MEET THE REQUIRED |
| | OVERTURN MOMENT. DETAIL A/D1 STATES THAT IT WILL BE |
| | NAILED OR SCREWED. FBC-R 905.3 & 301.1 |
| | |
| | 12) INDICATE WHICH OF THE ATTACHMENT METHODS AND THE |
| | CORRESPONDING ATTACHMENT RESISTANCE LISTED IN THE ROOF |
| | TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE USED. IF AN ADHESIVE IS |
| | USED, SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR IT. FBC |
| | 107.2.1 AND DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 13) REVIEW THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES IN THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS TO INSURE THEY ARE ADEQUATE FOR THE HIGHER |
| | PRESSURES REQUIRED IN EXPOSURE CATEGORY C. CIRCLE THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE COMPONENTS THAT WILL BE USED |
| | IN THE TABLES THAT ARE IN THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. FBC-R |
| | 301.2.1 & FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 14) THE TRUSS LAYOUT PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS NOT |
| | TOTALLY LEGIBLE. SUBMIT LEGIBLE SIGNED AND SEALED FLOOR |
| | AND ROOF TRUSS LAYOUT PLANS AND FLOOR AND ROOF TRUSS |
| | DRAWINGS THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEW AND APPROVED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. YOU MAY ELECT TO DEFER THE |
| | SUBMITTAL OF THE LAYOUT PLANS AND TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR |
| | REVIEW TO A LATER DATE THAT IS PRIOR TO TRUSS |
| | INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 15) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE |
| | CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
