| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-28 09:52:17 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE SIGN LOCATION PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT IS |
| | NOT THE SIGN LOCATION PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THE JUNE |
| | 23, 2015 MINOR PD AMENDMENT. PLEASE USE THE APPROVED |
| | SIGN LOCATION PLAN (AVAILABLE FROM COTLEUR & HEARING OR |
| | THE CITY?S PLANNING DIVISION) TO ANNOTATE WHICH SIGN |
| | TYPE IS BEING INSTALLED IN WHICH LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF IS CONFUSED AS TO WHICH SIGNS ARE INCLUDED ON |
| | THIS PERMIT APPLICATION. THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS |
| | INCLUDED WITH THE APPLICATION HAS THREE SIGN LOCATIONS |
| | HIGHLIGHTED; HOWEVER, THERE IS A PHOTO INCLUDED FOR |
| | SIGN A-1 WHICH IS AT A LOCATION NOT HIGHLIGHTED ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN AND THE PROVIDED CONTRACT IS FOR NINE SIGNS. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY WHICH AND HOW MANY SIGNS ARE INCLUDED ON |
| | THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 3) SIGN A-1 IS LOCATED TOO CLOSE TO THE HAVERHILL ROAD |
| | INTERSECTION AND BLOCKS THE SAFE VIEW OF DRIVERS. THE |
| | SIGN SHOWN (INSTALLED WITHOUT A PERMIT) SHALL BE MOVED |
| | BACK TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCATION SHOWN ON THE APPROVED |
| | SIGN LOCATION PLAN. THE SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED |
| | IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE TREE, IN LINE WITH THE |
| | PERIMETER WALL. |
| | |
| | 4) THE COLOR RENDERINGS THAT ARE SEALED BY THE ENGINEER |
| | CORRECTLY SHOW NO LOGOS ON THEM. THE PHOTO OF SIGN A-1 |
| | (INSTALLED WITHOUT A PERMIT) SHOWS THE MORSELIFE NAME |
| | AND LOGO, WHICH SHALL BE REMOVED. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | GOOGLE STREET VIEW SHOWS ADDITIONAL SIGNS INSTALLED |
| | (WITHOUT PERMITS) WITH SIGN A-3 CLEARLY DISPLAYING THE |
| | NAME AND LOGO. THESE NAMES AND LOGOS SHALL BE REMOVED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERMIT PLANS. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
