| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-06 12:54:54 | 8/6/15 |
| | RESPONSE TO STEVE KENNEDY FOR COMMENTS FROM MR. RAY |
| | PUZZITIELLO REGARDING THE PROVISO ITEMS: |
| | |
| | STEVE THIS ARE MY OBSERVATIONS ON THIS PROVISO: |
| | #1 IS OK. |
| | #2(A) IS OK. |
| | #2(B) ARCHITECT WILL PROVIDE INFORMATION. |
| | #3 (A) IS OK. |
| | #3 (B) A 2X4 DOOR BUCK DOESN'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR FRAME. THE DOOR FRAME IS WIDER THAN 3-1/2" |
| | ACTUAL SIZE OF 2X4 BUCK. I AM NOT SAYING THAT IT |
| | DOESN'T MEET THE PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS. I AM |
| | SAYING THAT IT NEEDS TO BE WIDER TO PROVIDE FUL SUPOORT |
| | TO THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R612.10.2.1 |
| | #4(A) WIL BE SUBMITTED. |
| | #4(B) THERE ARE NOT INSULATED DOORS. SEE PLANS AND |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR TYPE OF DOORS. DOORS WITH GLAZING |
| | NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GLAZING CALCULATIONS. PLANS |
| | DON'T SPECIFY GARAGE DOOR #2 TO BE INSULATED. PLANS AND |
| | ENERGY CALCUALTIONS TO MATCH. |
| | #4(C) WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE INSPECTOR. |
| | #5 (A) I DON'T SEE ANY FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FL15180.14 AS LISTED ON SHEET A4. |
| | #5 (B) I DON'T SEE ANY FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FL15180.16 AS LISTED ON SHEET A4. |
| | #6 IS OK |
| | #7 THIS IS THE ANSWER I GET ALL THE TIME " THE |
| | INSTALLATION IS IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL". BUT, THIS |
| | DOESN'T TELL ME (AND THE INSPECTOR) IF THE PROPOSED |
| | INSTALLATION WILL WORK. WE HAVE A CITY POLICY AND CITY |
| | SAMPLE OF THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. AS FAR AS I KNOW |
| | WE ALWAYS ASK FOR THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | #8 IS OK. |
| | |
| | |
