| Plan Review Notes For Permit 15020017 |
| Permit Number |
15020017 |
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2015-02-05 14:12:38 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | SHEET 1.1 INDICATES THAT THE ENTRY DOOR TO BE CLOSED | | | AND LOCKED. | | | | | | SHEET 4.1 INDICATES A EXIT PATH PLAN. NO OCCUPANCY | | | LOADS OR CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED. COMMON PATH OF | | | TRAVEL DIMENSIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED. AN EXIT PATH ON THE | | | BOTTON LEFT OF THE PAGE DOES NOT SHOW THE EXIT. EXIT | | | CORRIDOR AND EXIT DOOR WIDTHS ARE NOT PROVIDED. THE | | | DOOR EXIT DOORS OPENING TO THE PATIO CAN NOT BE COUNTED | | | AS TWO SEPARATE EXITS. THE PROVIDED EXITS DO NOT MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION NFPA 101, 7.5.1.3.3, IN | | | BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY A SPRINKLER SYSTEM, | | | THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO EXITS OR | | | EXIT ACCESS DOORS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE | | | LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE | | | BUILDING OR AREA BEING SERVED. | | | | | | THE ENTRY DOOR NOTED ABOVE SHALL REMAIN OPEN AND | | | FUNCTION AS AN EXIT. | | | | | | RESUBMIT PLANS SHOWING CORRECTIONS NOTED ABOVE OR | | | SUBMIT JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ELIMINATION OF THE ENTRY | | | DOOR WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FIRE CODE. |
|
