| Date |
Text |
| 2015-02-10 12:14:37 | PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | 2/10/15 |
| | |
| | BUILDING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. ZLDR SEC. 94-221(D)(5) REQUIRES STOREFRONTS ALONG |
| | FRONTAGE LINES...EACH STOREFRONT MUST HAVE CLEAR GLAZED |
| | AREAS, ALONG A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE |
| | LENGTH, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND. |
| | WHILE ADDITIONAL WINDOWS WITH CLEAR GLAZING IS |
| | PREFERRED TO MEET THE MINIMUM GLAZING REQUIREMENT WITH |
| | THE FACADE RENOVATION, IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THERE ARE |
| | EXISTING INTERNAL FUNCTIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING |
| | WHICH DO NOT MAKE THIS OPTIONS PRACTICAL. HOWEVER, |
| | ADDITIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS SUCH AS FAUX WINDOW, |
| | TRELLIS, LANDSCAPING, AWNINGS, ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, |
| | ETC. WILL NEED TO BE PROPOSED ALONG THE 'BLANK' PORTION |
| | OF THE FACADE ALONG BROADWAY TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE |
| | BMUD ZONING DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FOR AN URBAN, |
| | PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DISTRICT. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING |
| | CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED WINDOWS: |
| | A. ZLDR SEC. 94-221(D)(6)(C) - 'WINDOWS SHALL BE |
| | RECESSED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE |
| | OF THE FACADE.' |
| | B. ZLDR SEC. 94-221(D)(6)(D) - 'MULTIPLE WINDOWS IN THE |
| | SAME ROUGH OPENING SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A FOUR-INCH |
| | WIDE POST AND SIT ON ONE CONTINUOUS SILL.' |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 3. INCLUDE PROPERTY SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 4. DIMENSION BUILDING SETBACK INCLUDING THE |
| | ADDITION(S). |
| | |
| | 5. DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANTS IN THE BMUD TYPE II ZONING |
| | DISTRICT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRA REQUIREMENTS. ALL |
| | PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE 100 FEET |
| | FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT (ZLDR SEC. |
| | 94-273(D)(66)). A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT ABUTS THE |
| | SUBJECT PROPERTY TO THE EAST. PLEASE DIMENSION PLANS TO |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE. ANY NEW ADDITIONS WITHIN THIS 100 FOOT |
| | SETBACK ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A WAVIER THROUGH THE |
| | CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 6. DIMENSION DRIVE AISLES TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIREMENTS (ZLDR SEC. 94-485). |
| | |
| | 7. HOW WILL SOMEONE IN THE PARKING LOT ACCESS THE |
| | BUILDING ENTRANCE? PLEASE INDICATE THE ROUTE OF SAFE |
| | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. |
| | |
| | 8. 'NEW CONCRETE WALK' ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING IS NOT A FUNCTIONAL WALKWAY BECAUSE OF THE |
| | MENU BOARD AND PROPOSED ADDITION. IF THIS IS INTENDED |
| | TO BE A FUNCTIONAL WALKWAY OR PROVIDE A CONNECTION |
| | PLEASE REVISE TO DEMONSTRATE FEASIBILITY AS A WALKWAY. |
| | OTHERWISE, PROVIDE LANDSCAPING WITHIN THIS AREA RATHER |
| | THAN CONCRETE. |
| | |
| | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE AND INDICATE THE LOCATION OF TRAFFIC |
| | CONTROL SIGNAGE (I.E. DO NOT ENTER, ONE-WAY, STOP). |
| | |
| | 10. HOW DOES SOMEONE EXIT THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE? |
| | IT APPEARS THEY WOULD NEED TO BACK-UP IN TO THE |
| | ENTRANCE DRIVE TO BE ABOUT TO PROCEED IN THE ONE-WAY |
| | DIRECTION AROUND THE BUILDING. THIS IS VERY UNSAFE FOR |
| | ANY PARKING SPACE TO BE LOCATED IN FRONT OF THE |
| | BUILDING WITH THE PROPOSED CONFIGURATION. PLEASE |
| | REVISE. |
| | |
| | 11. PLEASE REVISE PARKING CALCULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH ZLDR SEC. 94-221(F)(1). THE SITE WILL LIKELY |
| | EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PARKING PERMITTED, HOWEVER, THE SITE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS ARE BRINGING THE SITE CLOSER TO COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE MAXIMUM PARKING REGULATIONS SO THE CAP WILL |
| | NOT APPLY AS LONG AS YOU ARE REDUCING THE PARKING AND |
| | NOT INCREASING IT. |
| | |
| | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | ZLDR SEC. 94-111(I). INDICATE LOCATION OF BICYCLE |
| | PARKING ON SITE PLAN AND PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING THE |
| | BICYCLE RACK AND MINIMUM SPACING DIMENSIONS. (NOTE: |
| | BICYCLE RACK SHOULD BE AN INVERTED U, A, POST AND LOOP, |
| | OR SIMILAR STYLE. WAVE STYLE RACKS ARE NOT PERMITTED.) |
| | |
| | 13. NEW LIGHTING IS PROPOSED FOR THE BUILDING. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | ZLDR SEC. 94-309(A) AND 94-310(D). |
| | |
| | 14 PARKING STRIPING DETAIL WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DOUBLE LINE STRIPING DETAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | ZLDR SEC. 94-485. |
| | |
| | 15. ALL PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE DIMENSIONED. |
| | |
| | 16. PROVIDE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING DETAILS FOR THE |
| | HANDICAP PARKING SPACE. |
| | |
| | 17. BASED ON 1) EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000 |
| | (ZLDR SEC. 94-219(D)(9)(A)) AND/OR 2) THE VALUE OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION ($200,000) EXCEEDING 50% OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($44,334) ACCORDING TO THE PBC |
| | PROPERTY APPRAISER (ZLDR SEC. 94-441(C)(2)), THE |
| | LANDSCAPING ON THE SITE SHALL BE BROUGHT IN TO |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN |
| | ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS. IF THE SITE CONFORMS TO |
| | ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE |
| | PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO |
| | ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS |
| | PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND IRRIGATION |
| | PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL TO BRING THE |
| | SITE INTO CONFORMITY. |
| | |
| | 18. THE CONCRETE ISLAND IN REAR OF PROPERTY BEING |
| | PROPOSED WITH THE NEW PARKING LOT CONFIGURATION SHOULD |
| | BE LANDSCAPED. |
| | |
| | 19. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, BACKFLOW |
| | PREVENTERS, AND SIMILAR DEVICES SHALL BE SCREENED FROM |
| | VIEW ON ALL SIDE BY THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE BY |
| | LANDSCAPING OR BUILT ELEMENTS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL |
| | PART OF THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. |
| | |
| | 20. WILL SITE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF ANY |
| | TREES? IF YES, PLEASE SUBMIT A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION THROUGH THE PLANNING DIVISION: HTTP://WPB.O |
| | RG/PLANNING/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/37/2013/04/TREEALT |
| | ERATIONPERMITREVISED03-12-09.PDF |
| | |
| | 21. A NEW DOUBLE DRIVE-THRU CONFIGURATION IS BEING |
| | PROPOSED FOR THE SITE TO FACILITATE A MORE EFFICIENT |
| | MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE THROUGH THE DRIVE-THRU. THERE IS |
| | SOME CONCERN WITH EXCESSIVE STACKING TO SPILL OUT ON TO |
| | BROADWAY. WILL THERE BE A PLAN IN PLACE TO PREVENT |
| | EXCESSIVE STACKING AND BACK-UP ONTO BROADWAY? |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 22. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPING AND |
| | PARKING LOT STRIPING. |
| | |
| | 23. SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE AND ZONING |
| | WILL CONDUCT THEIR REVIEW OF THE SIGNAGE AT THAT TIME. |
| | |
| | 24. ALL REFERENCES TO THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) CAN BE FOUND AT THE |
| | FOLLOWING LINK: HTTPS://WWW.MUNICODE.COM/LIBRARY/FL/WES |
| | T_PALM_BEACH/CODE_OF_ORDINANCES/TOC |
| | |
| | 25. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME PRIOR TO RESUBMITING TO |
| | DISCUSS PROPOSED REVISIONS. |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | |
| | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION |
| | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| 2015-02-02 15:26:58 | 2/2/15 |
