| Date |
Text |
| 2015-01-22 19:00:54 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) SPECIFY THE SLOPE OF THE ROOF AND THE MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. FBC 107.1.2 |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR AH160 ROOF TILE |
| | ADHESIVE. DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 3) ACCORDING TO THE PBC PROPERTY APPRAISER THIS |
| | STRUCTURE WAS BUILT IN 1985 AND HAS A VALUE OF |
| | $504,099.00. THE WINDLOAD REQUIREMENTS WERE NOT ADOPTED |
| | IN PALM BEACH COUNTY UNTIL 1988. THEREFORE, YOU ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| | FBC EXISTING BUILDINGS 611.8 |
| | WHEN A ROOF COVERING ON AN EXISTING |
| | SITE-BUILT-SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE IS |
| | REMOVED AND REPLACED ON A BUILDING THAT IS LOCATED IN |
| | THE WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGION AS DEFINED IN THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AND THAT HAS AN INSURED VALUE |
| | OF $300,000 OR MORE OR, IF THE BUILDING IS UNINSURED OR |
| | FOR WHICH DOCUMENTATION OF INSURED VALUE IS NOT |
| | PRESENTED, HAS A JUST VALUATION FOR THE STRUCTURE FOR |
| | PURPOSES OF AD VALOREM TAXATION OF $300,000 OR MORE: |
| | |
| | (A) ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IMPROVED AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SECTION 611.8.1 |
| | |
| | (B) MANDATED RETROFITS OF THE ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTION |
| | SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED BEYOND A 15 PERCENT INCREASE IN |
| | THE COST OF RE-ROOFING. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTION: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES |
| | PERMITTED SUBJECT TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION. |
| | |
| | FBC EXISTING BUILDINGS 611.8.1 ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS |
| | FOR SITE-BUILT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. |
| | WHERE REQUIRED BY SECTION 611.8, THE INTERSECTION OF |
| | ROOF FRAMING WITH THE WALL BELOW SHALL PROVIDE |
| | SUFFICIENT RESISTANCE TO MEET THE UPLIFT LOADS |
| | SPECIFIED IN TABLE 611.8.1 EITHER BECAUSE OF EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS OR THROUGH RETROFIT MEASURES. AS AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE TO AN ENGINEERED DESIGN, THE PRESCRIPTIVE |
| | RETROFIT SOLUTIONS PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 611.8.1.1 |
| | THROUGH 611.8.1.7 SHALL BE ACCEPTED AS MEETING THE |
| | MANDATED ROOF-TO-WALL RETROFIT REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTIONS: |
| | |
| | 1. WHERE IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED (BY CODE ADOPTION DATE |
| | DOCUMENTATION AND PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) THAT |
| | ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS AND/OR ROOF-TO-FOUNDATION |
| | CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH REQUIREMENTS WERE REQUIRED AT THE |
| | TIME OF ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 2. ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | UNLESS EVALUATION AND INSTALLATION OF CONNECTIONS AT |
| | GABLE ENDS OR ALL CORNERS CAN BE COMPLETED FOR 15 |
| | PERCENT OF THE COST OF ROOF REPLACEMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
