| Date |
Text |
| 2015-03-03 14:59:58 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE SOIL REPORT STATES THAT A TWENTY ( 20) INCH WIDE |
| | FOOTING IS REQUIRED AND THE PLANS ARE FOR AN EIGHTEEN |
| | (18) INCH WIDE FOOTING. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM SPECIFIES ONE (1) |
| | BEDROOM AND THE PLANS HAVE THREE (3) BEDROOMS. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) THE INFORMATION FOR THE ISOLATED FOOTERS AT THE REAR |
| | PORCH ARE ILLEGIBLE DUE TO BEING PRINTED OVER ON THE |
| | PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) FBC 107.3.5.3 - PROVIDE WIND DESIGN DATA (IE. |
| | WINDSPEED, EXPOSURE CATEGORY, ETC.)ON THE PLANS |
| | PURSUANT TO FBC-R301.2. |
| | |
| | 5) R803.2.3.1 SHEATHING FASTENINGS. |
| | WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL BE FASTENED TO |
| | ROOF FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS AT 6 INCHES ON |
| | CENTER AT EDGES AND 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE |
| | FRAMING. RING-SHANK NAILS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING |
| | MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: |
| | 1. 0.113 INCH NOMINAL SHANK DIAMETER. |
| | 2. RING DIAMETER OF 0.012 OVER SHANK DIAMETER. |
| | 3. 16 TO 20 RINGS PER INCH. |
| | 4. 0.280 INCH FULL ROUND HEAD DIAMETER. |
| | 5. 2 INCH NAIL LENGTH. |
| | WHERE ROOF FRAMING WITH A SPECIFIC GRAVITY, 0.42 < OR = |
| | G < 0.49 IS USED, SPACING OF RING-SHANK FASTENERS SHALL |
| | BE 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN NAILING ZONE 3 IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH FIGURE R803.2.3.1 WHERE VASD AS DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R301.2.1.3 IS 130 MPH OR |
| | GREATER. |
| | |
| | 6) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. (1) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THE JELD-WEN OUT SWING OPAQUE DOOR WITH |
| | SIDELITES DOES NOT HAVE THE FL# INDICATED ON THE |
| | DOCUMENTS THAT WERE SUBMITTED. (2) NO PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE FIXED GLASS WINDOW ABOVE THE |
| | FRONT DOOR. (3) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR A |
| | JELD WEN INSWING GLAZED DOOR SYSTEM WITH SIDELITES (NOA |
| | NO. 09-0608.15) , HOWEVER THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY |
| | INSWING DOORS. |
| | |
| | 7) THE VALUATION THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THIS STRUCTURE |
| | IS LOW BASED ON THE CURRENT ICC VALUATION DATA. THE |
| | CALCULATED VALUE FOR DETERMINING PERMIT FEES IS |
| | $173,945.00. THE VALUATION HAS BEEN ADJUSTED |
| | ACCORDINGLY. FBC 109.3 |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE |
| | CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE |
| | |
| | YOU ARE REQUIRED TO FILL OUT A RE-SUBMITTAL FORM TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE CORRECTED PLANS AND/OR OTHER |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | THE PERMIT CLERK WILL RETRIEVE THE DENIED APPLICATION, |
| | PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. |
| | YOU ARE REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE OLD PLAN SHEETS THAT |
| | HAVE BEEN CORRECTED AND REPLACE THEM WITH THE NEW ONES. |
| | THE CLERK WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH A STAPLE REMOVER AND A |
| | STAPLER. ONE SET OF THE OLD PLAN SHEETS THAT HAVE BEEN |
| | REMOVED SHALL BE MARKED AS VOIDED AND RESUBMITTED ALONG |
| | WITH THE TWO (OR MORE) SETS THAT CONTAIN THE CORRECTED |
| | SHEETS. IF THERE ARE ANY SHEETS THAT HAVE BEEN STAMPED |
| | FOR COUNTY IMPACT FEES, HOA APPROVAL STAMPS OR OTHERS, |
| | RESUBMIT THOSE SHEETS. |
| | IF ALL OF THE PLAN SHEETS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED, THEN TWO |
| | (OR MORE) SETS OF THE NEW PLANS AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | |
