City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Notes

Plan Review Notes For Permit 14120908
Permit Number	14120908
Review Stop	B
Sequence Number	2

Notes

Date	Text
2015-04-12 14:37:40	**CORRECTIONS**

	SAMANTHA HILL
	BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
	[email protected]
	561-805-6724

	COMMENTS FROM FIRST BUILDING PLAN REVIEW BY JIM WITMER
	WHICH ARE STILL APPLICABLE:

	1) MISSING INFORMATION EVEN FOR A FOUNDATION PERMIT:
	2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
	CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION

	107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS.
	107.3.5.1.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS:
	1.1) SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF THE NEW BUILDING AND
	THE RELATIONSHIP OF OTHER BUILDINGS, PROVIDE DISTANCES
	BETWEEN.
	1.2) SURVEY WITH FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION
	1.3) SOILS REPORT WITH THE MINIMUM BEARING VALUE FOR
	THIS BUILDING (DUNKELBERGER REPORT DATED 12/31/14
	REFERENCE ON SHEET S4.1; PROVIDE ALL GEOTECHNICAL
	REPORTS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT).
	1.4) ARCHITECTURAL SHEET SHOWING THE 1ST FLOOR OR
	BOTTOM FLOOR, WITH FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
	1.5) OK
	1.6) MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE/ NUMBER OF STORIES (INCLUDE
	NUMBER OF STORIES FOR EXISTING BUILDING)

	2. THRESHOLD FORMS WERE E-MAILED TO RYAN TEMPONE
	1/10/2015 01:05 PM BY JIM WITMER.

	THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN FL S. S. 553.71(7) "
	THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS
	GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH
	HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DENIED IN
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ FT IN
	AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500
	PERSONS.

	2A) OK; SHEET S 3.4, THRESHOLD INSPECTION NOTES ARE
	INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL.
	KEN CONRAD, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR HAS BEEN ADVISED
	THAT THE PLAN IS AVAILABLE FOR HIS REVIEW.

	2B) THRESHOLD INSPECTOR REQUIRED; SEE PREVIOUS LIST FOR
	SPECIFICS.

	2C) THRESHOLD BLDG, REQUIRED STATEMENT: W.P.B.
	AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH
	ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT
	OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE
	BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE
	PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
	MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND FIRE SAFETY STANDARDS AS
	DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THIS SECTION AND 633 FLORIDA STATUTE.

	2ND REVIEW, I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS STATEMENT. SEE
	OTHER COMMENTS; THIS STATEMENT IS TYPICALLY
	INCORPORATED INTO EVERY PAGE.

	2D) SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME REQUIRED; SEE PREVIOUS
	LIST FOR SPECIFICS.

	2E) CONTRACTOR RESUME REQUIRED; SEE PREVIOUS LIST FOR
	SPECIFICS.

	2F) INFORMATIONAL ONLY; NOTE THIS IS A DIGITAL PLAN,
	AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL
	YOU, THE APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY
	PRINT YOUR PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE
	PRINTED IN COLOR, (1) FOR THE THRESHOLD INSPECTOR, THE
	OTHER FOR THE MEP INSPECTORS.

	2G) INFORMATIONAL ONLY; PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561)
	805-6700) FOR IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF
	JOBSITE INSPECTIONS.

	3) PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION HOW THE JOBSITE WILL
	COMPLY WITH :
	2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
	CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 110.7 IMPACT OF
	CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY
	THIS CODE SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER SO AS NOT TO
	ADVERSELY IMPACT THE CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY,
	UNLESS SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID
	PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT GRANTED BY THE
	APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER TERMS OR CONDITIONS
	AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS
	INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE CONTROL OF DUST,
	NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFFS, DEBRIS, AND THE
	STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION
	ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT LEGAL HISTORIC
	SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT
	PROPERTIES, AND MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN
	COMPLYING WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE
	POSITIVE DRAINAGE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES.
	ACCORDINGLY, DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS AND OWNERS OF ALL
	NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS,
	POOLS, PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON
	EXISTING PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A SIGNIFICANT DECREASE
	OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCEL OR HAS ALTERED THE
	DRAINAGE FLOW ON THE DEVELOPED PROPERTY SHALL, AS A
	PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED
	DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
	PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A
	CERTIFICATION FROM A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL
	OF THE FINAL INSPECTION.

	2ND REVIEW; A STATEMENT IT TYPICALLY INCORPORATED INTO
	THE PLAN.

	4. 2010 FBC B 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE
	CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY OF THE SOIL
	IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO
	THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE BUILDING
	OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A
	GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED.

	5) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
	FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
	PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
	A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
	APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
	INFORMATION.

	THIS MAY BE DONE AT ANY TIME DURING THE PLAN REVIEW
	PROCESS, BUT MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.

	NEW COMMENTS (NEW SHEETS SUBMITTED; SCOPE EXPANDED FROM
	FOUNDATION ONLY TO ADDITION TO EXISTING BUILDING):
	6. FOR ALL THRESHOLD JOBS, FS 553.79(7)(D)?ALL PLANS
	FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND
	SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A
	STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT?S OR
	ENGINEER?S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
	COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND
	THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY
	THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND
	CHAPTER 633.

	PLEASE INCORPORATE THIS STATEMENT INTO THE PLANS. IT IS
	TYPICAL FOR THIS STATEMENT TO BE ON EACH SHEET. IF
	DESIGNER OBJECTS TO INCLUDING THIS STATEMENT ON EACH
	SHEET AND WOULD LIKE THE STATEMENT ON ONE SHEET ONLY,
	PLEASE ADVISE AND THIS OPTION WILL BE INVESTIGATED WITH
	THE APPROPRIATE BOARD.

	7. THIS DINING ROOM ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BUILDING IS
	TO BE CONNECTED TO A NEW BUILDING. SEE PREVIOUS LIST
	AND REFERENCE TO FBC 3104.5. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER
	THE NEW BUILDING WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ADDITION TO THE
	EXISTING BUILDING, ON THE SAME PARCEL, CONNECTED BY A
	WALKWAY, OR IF WILL BE TREATED AS A NEW BUILDING,
	SEPARATE PARCEL, OR NEW BUILDING, SAME PARCEL (WITH
	UNITY OF TITLE, SEE OTHER COMMENTS).

	8. IT APPEARS THAT ALL PARTIES (ARCHITECT, ENGINEER,
	CONTRACTOR, OWNER) ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THIS PROJECT
	WILL BE TREATED AS A THRESHOLD JOB. IF ANY OF THE
	PARTIES DISAGREE WITH THIS CLASSIFICATION, PLEASE
	CONTACT ME.

	CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AGREES THAT, IF ALL PARTIES
	FOR THE TWO PROJECTS (DINING ROOM EXPANSION AND PHASE
	I, 14120908 AND 14120909) ARE THE SAME, ONE SET OF
	THRESHOLD DOCUMENTS (RESUMES, AGREEMENTS) IS
	ACCEPTABLE. IF THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ANY OF THE
	PARTIES, PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS.

	9. THE BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER, NAME AND ADDRESS SHOWN
	ON THE PLAN (PERKINS EASTMAN, FS95000000559,
	PITTSBURGH, PA) ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH DBPR RECORDS
	(PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS, D.P.C., INC, AA26000763,
	NEW YORK, NY). SINCE THE ADDRESS, NAME, AND LICENSE
	NUMBER ARE DIFFERENT FROM DBPR RECORDS, IT IS NOT
	POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE ARCHITECT (COMPANY) TAKING
	RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN.
	SEE FS 481.219, CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED
	AND THE NUMBER IS TO BE ON ALL FINAL CONSTRUCTION
	DOCUMENTS.

	HTTP://WWW.MYFLORIDALICENSE.COM/DBPR/PRO/ARCH/STATUTES.
	HTML

	10. PAPA RECORDS SHOW A PROPERTY LINE WHICH IS NOT
	SHOWN ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED. WILL THE TWO PROPERTIES
	REMAIN SEPARATE PARCELS, HAVE THEY ALREADY BEEN
	COMBINED WITH A UNITY OF TITLE, OR WILL THEY BE
	COMBINED WITH A UNITY OF TITLE? IF THEY ARE TO REMAIN
	SEPARATE PARCELS, SEE FBC TABLE 602, TABLE 705.8 AND
	REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE (DISTANCE TO PROPERTY
	LINE, RATED WALLS AS APPLICABLE, PROTECTED OPENINGS IF
	PERMITTED).

	IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN 4920 LORING
	DRIVE AND 4850 LORING DRIVE DIVIDES THE NEW BUILDING
	KNOWN AS TRADITIONS II PHASE ONE.

	HTTP://WWW.PBCGOV.COM/PAPA/ASPS/PROPERTYDETAIL/PROPERTY
	DETAIL.ASPX?PARCEL=74424312260030000&SRCHTYPE=ADV&OWNER
	=&STREETNO=4850&PREFIX=&STREETNAME=LORING&SUFFIX=&POSTD
	IR=&UNITNO=&SRCHPARCEL=&RANGE=&TWP=&SECTION=&BOOK=&PAGE
	=&LEGAL=&SUBDIV=&MUNI=&ZIP=&USETYPE=&CONDO=

	DISTANCE OF PROPOSED DINING ROOM ADDITION TO THE
	PROPERTY LINE IS UNCLEAR.

	IF YOU HAVE NOT ALREADY SUBMITTED APPLICATION FOR UNITY
	OF TITLE AND WISH TO DO SO, THE APPLICATION IS
	AVAILABLE ONLINE:

	HTTP://WPB.ORG/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/7/2012/05/2011-
	11-14-16-09-54-APPLICATIONFORUNITYOFTITLE.PDF

	11. AS PERMITS 14120908 AND 14120909 WERE INITIALLY
	FOUNDATION PERMITS, PLEASE PROVIDE NEW APPLICATIONS
	WITH THE NEW SCOPE OF WORK AND VALUE, SIGNED BY THE
	QUALIFIER AND THE OWNER. ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT IT
	APPEARS THAT THE NEW BUILDING (TRADITIONS II PHASE ONE)
	IS LOCATED PRIMARILY ON A PARCEL WITH AN ADDRESS OF
	4850 LORING DRIVE, LOCATED ON TRACT C, PARCEL ID
	74-42-43-12-26-003-0000.

	I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE WHICH
	COMBINES THE TWO SEPARATE PARCELS. IF AVAILABLE, PLEASE
	PROVIDE. SEE OTHER COMMENT REGARDING DISTANCE TO
	PROPERTY LINE.

	12. ADVISORY ONLY, THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES WAS SENT
	VIA EMAIL, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES
	78-123, 78-126.

	THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE PROVISO THAT,
	WITHIN 90 DAYS OF ISSUANCE, THE APPROVAL WILL BE
	PROVIDED. PLEASE SEND A COPY OF THE APPROVAL WHEN
	AVAILABLE VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] IN ORDER TO
	DOCUMENT THE PERMIT FILE.

	13. ADVISORY ONLY, FS 553.79(7)(C)ALL SHORING AND
	RESHORING PROCEDURES, PLANS, AND DETAILS BE SUBMITTED
	TO THE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING.
	SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING TO BE SUBMITTED AT EACH
	LIFT. FAILURE TO SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE PLANS TO THE
	BUILDING DIVISION FOR PLAN REVIEW AT THE TIME OF EACH
	LIFT MAY RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. AS THIS ISSUE HAS
	BEEN PROBLEMATIC IN THE PAST, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A
	NOTE BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN.

	14. ADVISORY ONLY, PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW PRIOR
	TO INSTALLATION IF NOT SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME, FBC 107,
	FBC 1609 (SUBMITTAL, NO FEE).

	15. ADVISORY ONLY, AT THIS TIME, THE "R" (ROOFING) STOP
	HAS A REVIEW STATUS OF "N". PRODUCT APPROVALS AND
	ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF
	ROOF SUB PERMIT APPLICATION IF NOT SUBMITTED DURING THE
	PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE ADDITION.

	16. ADVISORY ONLY, NO ACTION REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.
	PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT LANDSCAPE SHEETS HAVE BEEN
	VOIDED BY ZONING AND HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED. A SEPARATE
	LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED.

	17. ADVISORY ONLY; PARKING LOT STRIPING, AWNINGS, SIGNS
	AND OTHER INDEPENDT STRUCTURE ELEMENTS REQUIRE SEPARATE
	PERMITS WHICH WOULD INCLUDE FEES, BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATIONS, PLANS AND REVIEWS.

	18. FBC EXISTING BUILDING 101.5, ADDITION AND
	ALTERATION TO COMPLY WITH ONE OF THE COMPLIANCE METHODS
	LISTED IN SECTIONS 101.5.1 THROUGH 101.5.3 AS SELECTED
	BY APPLICANT. REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE METHOD OF
	COMPLIANCE SELECTED. AS THIS IS BOTH AN ADDITION AND AN
	ALTERATION, WITH FUTURE ADDITIONS PLANNED, INFORMATION
	REGARDING THE EXISTING BUILDING (SUCH AS THE CODE IT
	WAS PERMITTED UNDER) WOULD HELP EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW.
	FOR INSTANCE, THE COMMENT REGARDING THE FIRE RESISTANCE
	RATING FOR THE FIRE PUMP ROOM; 2 HOURS REQUIRED BY
	TABLE 508.2.5. IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER THIS WAS
	IN COMPLIANCE WHEN THE BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED AND CAN
	REMAIN AS IS, CODE IN EFFECT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
	EXISTING BUILDING AND METHOD OF ALTERATION IS REQUIRED.
	THIS IS ONE EXAMPLE OF ISSUES WHICH MAY ARISE, BOTH IN
	PLAN REVIEW AND IN THE FIELD, WHICH WOULD BE ADDRESSED
	UNDER THE APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING
	CODE.

	19. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 103.2.1.2, ENERGY CALCS
	REQUIRED.

	20. G001 PROVIDES A SUMMARY OF BUILDING CODE
	REQUIREMENTS BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE INFORMATION
	REGARDING THE EXISTING BUILDING. PLEASE PROVIDE
	BUILDING HEIGHT, AREA, TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD (SEE COMMENT
	REGARDING RISK CATEGORY).

	IT APPEARS THAT THIS ADDITION IS AN ADDITION TO A HIGH
	RISE AND IS BEING TREATED AS SUCH IN PLAN REVIEW.

	21. G101, PATH OF TRAVEL IS SHOWN ACROSS THE DIAGONAL
	OF THE ROOMS. FBC 1016.1, THIS SHOULD BE SHOWN ALONG
	THE NATURAL UNOBSTRUTED PATH OF TRAVEL. AS FURNITURE
	WILL BE PLACED IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, THE PATH
	SHOULD BE MEASURED ALONG THE ROOM PERIMETER.

	22. SHEET G101, 2 HOUR SEPARATION REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE
	PUMP ROOM, FBC 2010 508.2.5. SEE OTHER COMMENT
	REGARDING EXISTING BUILDING CODE; IT IS NOT CLEAR IF
	THIS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED OR WAS COMPLIANT AT TIME OF
	PERMITTING.

	23. G101, 200 SF PER OCCUPANT IN THE EXTERIOR COURTYARD
	(AREA 110) DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A REASONABLE OCCUPANT
	LOAD, ESPECIALLY AS ADJACENT TO THIS AREA ON ALL SIDES
	IS ASSEMBLY. IT APPEARS THAT THIS AREA SHOULD ALSO BE
	CLASSIFIED AS ASSEMBLY, 15 SF PER PERSON. PLEASE REVISE
	OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND OCCUPANT LOAD. IT APPEARS
	HIGHLY LIKELY THAT THIS AREA MAY BE USED AS OUTDOOR
	DINING AT SOME POINT.

	24. G101, FOR ASSEMBLY AREAS, OCCUPANT LOAD CAN BE
	BASED ON NET SF AREA, SEE TABLE 1004; GROSS SF WAS
	STATED IN SOME PLACES AND NET WAS STATED IN OTHER
	PLACES. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO EXCEED THE MINIMUM
	REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE (USE GROSS RATHER THAN NET),
	BUT THIS METHOD SHOULD REMAIN CONSISTENT.

	25. EXIT STRATEGY NOT CLEAR. EX VERANDA IS LABELED AS
	R2, BUT APPEARS TO NOW PRIMARILY SERVE THE ASSEMBLY
	AREA. IT APPEARS THAT THE R2 CORRIDOR EXITS THROUGH
	DOORS 101 AND 101B. IT APPEARS THAT THE EXISTING A2 WAS
	SEPARATED FROM THE EXITING AREA (LOUNGE AND VERANDA)
	ALTHOUGH THE SEPARATION IS NOT SHOWN AS CONTINUOUS ON
	THIS PLAN.

	THE NEW ADDITION IS NOW OPEN TO THE EX VERANDA AND USES
	THE SAME EXIT AS THE R2 OCCUPANCY. ONCE A GIVEN LEVEL
	OF EXIT PROTECTION IS ACHIEVED, SUCH LEVEL OF PROECTION
	SHALL NOT BE REDUCED UNTIL ARRIVAL AT THE EXIT
	DISCHARGE. IN THE MEETING, CLASSIFICATION OF THIS AREA
	WAS DISCUSSED. FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME FOR FURTHER
	DISCUSSION. PERHAPS CONSIDER A VESTIBULE, 1027.1 TO
	RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF A2 EXITING THROUGH R2 OR R2
	EXITING THROUGH A2.

	26. G101, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXIT DISCHARGE. THE
	PATH FROM THE EXIT TO THE PUBLIC WAY OR OTHER COMPLIANT
	AREA SHOULD BE SHOWN ON EITHER THIS PLAN OR ANOTHER
	SHEET, FBC 1027.

	27. G101, DOOR 102 IS SHOWN AS AN EXIT, BUT A101 SHOWS
	THIS DOOR ENTERING ANOTHER (FUTURE) BUILDING, PLEASE
	CLARIFY, FBC 3302.1. ALTHOUGH THIS MAY BE ADDRESSED ON
	ANOTHER PLAN CURRENTLY IN THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, EACH
	PERMIT IS TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE WITHOUT
	RELYING ON ANOTHER PLAN (PARTICULARLY ONE WHICH IS NOT
	YET ISSUED OR REVIEWED).

	28. UL ASSEMBLIES ARE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS IN VARIOUS
	PLACES (EXAMPLE A301). FBC 107, EITHER INCORPORATE THE
	UL DETAILS INTO THE PLAN OR, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A
	SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED. THE SUBMITTAL SHOULD
	INCLUDE THE UL ASSEMBLY WITH SPECIFIC OPTIONS ELECTED
	TO BE MARKED. THE SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED
	BY DOR. IF THE UL ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT INCORPORATED INTO
	THE PLAN WITH OPTIONS INDICATED, THE SUBMITTAL IS
	REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED THROUGH PLAN REVIEW PRIOR TO
	INSTALLATION.

	IF THE ASSEMBLIES WITH APPLICABLE OPTIONS ARE NOT
	INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN, FUTURE SUBMISSION AS A
	SUBMITTAL WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM.

	29. SHEET A301 AND OTHER PAGES AS APPLICABLE, SPECIFY
	FIRE RESISTANCE RATING ON THE PLAN SO DESIGN INTENT IS
	CLEAR, FBC TABLE 601. IF A REDUCTION IS TAKEN DUE TO AN
	EXCEPTION, CITE THE APPLICABLE EXCEPTION (SUCH AS FBC
	2010 BUILDING 402.1.1(2)) AND PROVIDE ENOUGH
	INFORMATION REGARDING THE EXISTING BUILDING TO
	DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANT APPLICABILITY.

	30. SHEET A301, SPECIFY UL ASSEMBLY AND RATING REQUIRED
	FOR THE MECHANICAL ROOM FLOOR, BEARING WALLS,
	STRUCTURAL FRAME, FBC TABLE 601.

	31. SHEET S3.1, WIND LOADS, 170 MPH, RISK CATEGORY II,
	EXPOSURE C, ENCLOSED IS STATED AS WIND DESIGN CRITIERA
	FBC 1609. SEE SHEET G000, THE MAP FOR RISK CATEGORY III
	AND IV BUILDINGS IS SHOWN (FBC FIGURE 1609B). PLEASE
	CORRELATE.

	IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH RISK CATEGORY, PROVIDE TOTAL
	BUILDING OCCUPANT LOAD.

	32. S2.1 APPEARS TO HAVE A TYPO, TOP RIGHT, NOTE
	(STATES "PER ACI 18.12.4"); PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY
	AS APPLICABLE.

	33. S3.1, STANDARDS CANNOT BE REFERENCED AS "LATEST
	EDITION," SEE FBC 2010 CHAPTER 35. DESIGN IS TO COMPLY
	WITH THE STANDARD VERSION REFERENCED IN CHAPTER 35,
	REVISE ALL AS APPLICABLE.

	IF ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIC CONDITIONS WHERE THE EDITION
	USED FOR DESIGN CONFLICTS WITH THE EDITION SPECIFIED IN
	FBC CHAPTER 35, THIS CAN BE PROPOSED UNDER FBC 104.11,
	ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS, DESIGN AND METHODS OF
	CONSTRUCTION. IF APPLICABLE, THIS SHOULD BE DONE PRIOR
	TO RESUBMITTAL FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE BUILDING
	OFFICIAL.

	34. SECTION 1 S4.1, ALSO SECTION 5 AND OTHER PLACES,
	PLYWOOD SHEATHING SHOWN. THIS BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO
	BE NON COMBUSTIBLE, FBC 602.1. REVISE TO INCLUDE
	REQUIREMENT FOR FRT (ALSO TO CORRELATE WITH A101 AND
	OTHER SHEETS), FBC 603.1.1.1.3.

	35. S3.2, SPECIFY FLOOR LOADS FOR 2ND FLOOR MECHANICAL
	ROOM, FBC 1606, 1607.

	36. A101, DETAILS 7 AND 11, REVISE TO SHOW CENTER LINE
	AND DISTANCE REQUIRED FOR GRAB BAR, SEE FBC 2010
	ACCESSIBILITY FIGURE 604.5.2.

	37. A101, DETAIL 3, DOOR APPEARS TO ENCROACH CLEAR
	FLOOR SPACE REQUIRED FOR LAVATORY IN ROOM 111, FBC 2010
	ACCESSIBILITY 603.2.3.

	38. A101, DETAIL 3, SHOW 18IN CLEARANCE FOR DOOR 112,
	PULL SIDE, FBC ACCESSIBILITY FIGURE 404.2.4.1(A).

	39. A101, DETAIL 3, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE DRINKING
	FOUNTAIN (INCLUDING CLEAR FLOOR SPACE), FBC 2010
	ACCESSIBILITY 211.

	40. DETAIL A502 AND 1 A503, OTHER LOCATIONS, ROOF
	DETAIL IS LACKING THE 90LB OR OTHER CAP SHEET FOR TILE
	WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT IN THE CONCRETE ROOF TILE
	PRODUCT APPROVAL, FBC 1609.

	41. PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE MCKEON DOOR (SPEC
	SHEETS AND TEST REPORT), INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
	ALSO DISCUSSED IN THE MEETING WAS THE PRACTICALITY FOR
	ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE, FBC 107.

	42. A601, PROVIDE A LEGEND FOR THE HARDWARE SCHEDULE. A
	CLOSER IS REQUIRED FOR DOORS 111 AND 112, FBC
	ACCESSIBILITY 604.8.2.2. ALL DOORS (AND GATES, IF
	APPLICABLE) SERVING ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY TO HAVE FIRE
	EXIT HARDWARE, FBC 1008.1.10.

	43. FBC 1503.4, PROVIDE ROOF DRAINAGE CALUCLATIONS.

	44. DETAIL 4 SHEET A503, OVERFLOW SCUPPER APPEARS TO BE
	AT ROOF LEVEL. SEE FBC 1503.4.2.1, OVERFLOW SCUPPERS TO
	BE NOT LESS THAN 2 INCHES NOR MORE THAN 4 INCHES ABOVE
	THE ROOF COVERING.

	45. SHEET G101, FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY PLAN, DOES NOT
	INCLUDE EXITING FOR THE OCCUPANTS OF THE COURTYARD, FBC
	1004.8. REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE TRAVEL DISTANCE. IF
	OCCUPANT LOAD IS OVER 50, DOOR 109A TO SWING IN THE
	DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, BUT ALSO CANNOT BLOCK THE
	CORRIDOR, FBC 1008.1.2, 1005.2.

	46. FBC 713, PROVIDE PENETRATION DETAILS FOR WALLS AND
	FLOORS.

	47. SEE FIRE COMMENTS REGARDING EXIT SIGNS, FBC 1011.1.

	48. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION AND TYPE OF FIRE ALARM
	DEVICES, FBC 403.4.2, FBC ACCESSIBILITY 702.

	49. NO INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING SOME OF THE OTHER
	HIGH RISE REQUIREMENTS (FBC 403). SOME MAY BE EXISTING
	IN ANOTHER PORTION OF THE BUILDING NOT SHOWN, SOME MAY
	NOT BE REQUIRED DUE TO CODE IN EFFECT WHEN BUILDING WAS
	PERMITTED, BUT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE REVIEW,
	DESIGNER TO ELECT METHOD OF ALTERATION AND STATE THE
	CODE UNDER WHICH THE EXISTING BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED.

	50. FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY 703, SIGNS TO COMPLY WITH
	THIS SECTION.