| Date |
Text |
| 2015-03-27 14:01:18 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 03.27.2015 |
| | PERMIT NO.: 14120431 |
| | ADDRESS: 23RD STREET / PONCE DE LEON AVENUE |
| | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: DANIEL PETROCCHI |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 305.495.3745 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW 99-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT - THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE |
| | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS, AS OULTINED IN |
| | CHAPTER 78 - ARTICLE V OF THE CITY'S CODE OF |
| | ORDINANCES. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE ISSUED PREVIOUSLY, AND |
| | APPEAR TO NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | 1. THE PROPOSED PLANS DIFFER FROM THAT WHICH WAS |
| | APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION (RESOLUTION NO. |
| | 146-12). A MINOR DSI AMENDMENT APPLICATION SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - |
| | PLANNING DIVISION, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2. SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED. APPLICATION SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A |
| | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE (MATERIALS + LABOR). |
| | |
| | 3. THE SHADE/FLOWERING TREE SPACING ALONG THE EAST |
| | BUFFER, JUST SOUTH OF 23RD STREET, EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM |
| | SPACING. |
| | |
| | 4. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH A |
| | PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVIDING 120% COVERAGE. |
| | |
| | 5. SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 6. SHEET A.001 INDICATES THAT THE CIVIL PLANS ARE |
| | PROVIDED "FOR REFERENCE ONLY", BUT THE NOTES ON SHEET |
| | A.200 INDICATE THAT THE CIVIL PLANS ARE TO BE UTILIZED |
| | FOR ALL PARKING, ETC. PLEASE CLARIFY. WHAT PERMIT IS |
| | THE PARKING AND OTHER SITE-RELATED IMPROVEMENTS BEING |
| | COVERED UNDER? I HAVEN'T BEEN NOTIFIED OF ANY OTHER |
| | PERMIT APPLICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 7. BIKE RACK DETAIL AND DIMENSIONED LAYOUT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. BIKE RACKS SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED AND |
| | AVAILABLE FOR THE RETAIL SPACES...THE ONLY LOCATION |
| | SHOWN ON THE PLAN APPEARS TO BE ONLY AVAILABLE TO |
| | RESIDENTS FOR STORAGE. RESPONSE LETTER FROM ARCHITECT |
| | INDICATES THAT THE DETAIL IS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, |
| | BUT IT WAS NOT. RESPONSE LETTER FROM LANDSCAPE |
| | ARCHITECT INDICATES THAT THE DETAIL IS ON THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, BUT IT WAS NOT. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NEW AND ARE THE RESULT OF |
| | THE REVISIONS SUBMITTED, OR WERE NOT IDENTIFIED AT THE |
| | TIME OF THE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 8. ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE/PAVEMENT MARKING APPEARS TO BE |
| | NEEDED TO REGULATED TRAFFIC FLOW IN THE GARAGE. I |
| | BELIEVE WE'VE DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY THE ADDITION OF |
| | SIGNS HANGING FROM THE CEILING OF THE GARAGE, NO LEFT |
| | TURN SIGNS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 9. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT A CALL BOX WAS GONIG TO |
| | BE INSTALLED AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE TO PROVIDE |
| | ABILITY FOR GUESTS TO GAIN ACCESS AFTER THE GATES HAVE |
| | BEEN CLOSED. |
| | |
| | 10. AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | DIMENSION OF THE BALCONY PROJECTIONS ON THE ELEVATION, |
| | SHOW THEM OUTLINED ON THE SITE PLAN, ETC. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT BALCONIES, INCLUDING THEIR RAILINGS, SHALL NOT |
| | ENCROACH MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 11. THE PARKING SPACES CANNOT OVERHANG INTO THE |
| | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THIS IS AN ISSUE WITH THE |
| | WESTERN-MOST ROW OF PARKING, AS WELL AS THE 2 SPACES |
| | ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. AT THOSE SPACES ADJACENT |
| | TO THE 4.5 LANDSCAPE BUFFER, WHEEL STOPS SHOULD BE |
| | INSTALLED, OR THE CURB LINE MOVED IN 2 FEET, AND THE |
| | SPACES SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS "COMPACT". WITH THE |
| | ADDITION OF THE HANDICAP SPACE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY |
| | LINE, THIS IS A PROBLEM BECAUSE THE AREA ONLY ALLOWS |
| | FOR A 16 FOOT LONG SPACE, WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR A HANDICAP PARKING STALL. |
| | |
| | 12. DATA TABLE ON SHEET A2.00 INDICATES 19 COMPACT |
| | SPACES, BUT ONLY THREE ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 13. THE LANDSCAPING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING, AND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, |
| | CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED METAL CANOPY ACROSS THE |
| | FIRST FLOOR. THE CANOPY WILL NEED TO BE SEGMENTED AND |
| | INSTALLED BETWEEN THE TREES AT THE ENTRANCES/WALKWAYS |
| | INTO THE RETAIL SPACES. |
| | |
| | 14. EACH COMPACT SPACE WILL NEED TO BE SIGNED/MARKED AS |
| | SUCH. |
| | |
| | 15. LANDSCAPING NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED IN THE NORTHWEST |
| | CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AS THIS IS A REQUIRED LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE GATE INTO THE POOL |
| | AREA, AND THE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING |
| | CROSS THE PROPERTY LINE AND TIE INTO THE EXISTING |
| | SIDEWALK ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. THIS WOULD REQUIRE |
| | AN EASEMENT FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY BUT WILL ALLOW |
| | LANDSCAPING TO BE INSTALLED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 16. IT DOESN'T APPEAR TO MAKE SENSE FOR THE ALUMINUM |
| | FENCE TO EXTEND AS FAR EAST AS IT DOES, ON THE SOUTH |
| | PROPERTY LINE. THIS CREATES A 2-3 FOOT AREA BETWEEN THE |
| | FENCE AND THE BUILDING THAT WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT TO |
| | MAINTAIN, ETC. |
| | |
| | 17. IS THERE ANY WAY TO REINTRODUCE WINDOWS, ETC. INTO |
| | THE WEST ELEVATION? |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL |
| | PURPOSES ONLY: |
| | |
| | 18. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PERMITTING BY THE CITY?S |
| | ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | 19. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS OF |
| | ALL OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR UPGRADES NECESSARY TO |
| | EFFECTUATE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT |
| | LIMITED TO WATER MAINS, LIFT STATIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 20. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING |
| | AND MAINTAINING ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE PUBLIC |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE DEVELOPER SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS, |
| | AGREEMENTS, EASEMENTS, ETC. THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO |
| | EFFECTUATE SUCH INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1448 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
