| Date |
Text |
| 2015-03-18 15:44:16 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 14110863 |
| | ADD: 5483 LEEPER DR. |
| | CONT: ANDERSON MOORE CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (561) 662-1819 |
| | E-MAIL: RKENNEY @AMCBUILD.COM |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2015 |
| | ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED |
| | ELECTRONICALLY |
| | UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECT DOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE |
| | THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| | 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED |
| | NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| | 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE |
| | REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| | 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT |
| | TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES |
| | AVAILABLE |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | DATE: WED. MARCH 18/2015 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1-3) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REQUEST . ONLY (1) SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED, |
| | NOTE THIS JOB REQUIRES A RESIDENT INSPECTOR REQUIRING |
| | (3) SOILS REPORTS SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | 1ST REVIEW COMMENT. NO SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED, |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A REPORT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: 2010 FBC-B |
| | 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. |
| | WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY |
| | OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE |
| | SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A |
| | GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. ALSO SEE |
| | 1803.6 REPORTING. |
| | |
| | 5) THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A METAL/ STEEL FRAME |
| | WAREHOUSE WITH WELDS AND BOLTABLE CONNECTIONS. THIS |
| | JOBSITE QUALIFIES FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,110.3.9 OTHER |
| | INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE, |
| | OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED |
| | BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS |
| | OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER |
| | INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR |
| | QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED |
| | FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT |
| | BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING |
| | AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE. |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY |
| | AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES: |
| | 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE |
| | FOOT |
| | 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR |
| | METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION (WELDING AND BOLTABLE |
| | CONNECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 5A) THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS WILL BE E-MAILED TO |
| | CONTACT [email protected] PLEASE FILE OUT THE |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS AND RETURN TO W.P.B. BUILDING |
| | DEPARTMENT CARE OF JIM WITMER. |
| | |
| | FORMS RETURNED ARE MISSING THE ; |
| | 5A)(1) CERTIFIED INSPECTION CO. NAME. SHEET # 4 |
| | 5B((2) ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER SEAL & SIGNATURE. SHEET # |
| | 5 |
| | |
| | 5B) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME' |
| | OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE |
| | RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS |
| | SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE |
| | WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED, |
| | AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES |
| | WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST |
| | MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. |
| | CONTACT KEN CONRAD |
| | TEL: 561-805-6666 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 5C) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR |
| | HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD: |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 5D) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE |
| | REQUIRED. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE |
| | PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE APPROVED AND |
| | BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR PLANS, TWO |
| | SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN COLOR, (1) FOR |
| | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR THE MEP |
| | INSPECTORS. |
| | |
| | 5E) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED |
| | TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR |
| | IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE |
| | INSPECTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) 2ND REVIEW. SHEET S-3 DOES PROVIDE COMPONENTS AND |
| | CLADDING PRESSURES FOR WALL ZONES 4 & 5 DESIGNED VULT |
| | FOR 170 MPH/ 3 SECOND GUST, EXPOSURE C. PRESSURES ARE |
| | GOOD FOR A 35 FT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. SHEET A-4.00 |
| | INDICATES A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 38?-11? AND A EAVE |
| | HEIGHT OF 34?-8?. BY DEFINITION OF MEAN ROOF HEIGHT WE |
| | USE THE EAVE HEIGHT WHEN THE ROOF ANGLE OF LESS THAN OR |
| | EQUAL TO 10 DEGRESS (ACTUAL DEGREES OF 9.74). THE MEAN |
| | ROOF HEIGHT OF 34?-8? SHOULD BE USED. THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD IS DEFERRING THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| | PRESSURES TO THE NUCOR METAL BUILDING ENGINEER . |
| | |
| | THE NUCOR BUILDING IS DESIGNED TO VULT TO 180 MPH, |
| | EXPOSURE C AND A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 30 FT. (FROM |
| | FLOOR) NOT THE 35 FT. (34?-8?) TAKEN FROM GRADE. THERE |
| | IS A DIFFERENCE IN WIND SPEED DESIGN AND MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT. WITH THE MORE STRIKER WIND DESIGN THE |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING UNDER THE 170 WILL FAIL |
| | ALLOWING THE BUILDING TO EITHER IMPLODE OR EXPLODE |
| | DEPENDING ON THE WIND DIRECTION AND SIZE OF THE BREACH, |
| | THE BUILDING WAS NOT DESIGNED AS A PARTIALLY OPEN |
| | BUILDING. THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR |
| | THE BUILDING, WHEN THE ENGINEERING IS DEFERRED THE TWO |
| | ENGINEERS NEED TO COME TO A CONCLUSION AS TO WHICH |
| | DESIGN THE BUILDING IS TO BE BUILT. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM 1ST REVIEW. SHEET S-3.0 INDICATES DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA FOR THE METAL STRUCTURAL PORTION OF THIS |
| | BUILDING, UNDER THE 1ST REVIEW THERE WAS NO DOCUMENTS |
| | SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION TO THE |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING THAT DEALS WITH THE METAL SKIN |
| | AS TO THEIR DESIGN CRITERIA? WILL THE WHOLE BUILDING BE |
| | DESIGNED UNDER ASCE 7-10 OR WILL THERE BE OTHER DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA FOR THE METAL FRAMING AND CLADDING OF THE |
| | BUILDING. THE PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE; THERE ARE ALSO NO |
| | MEZZANINE DETAILS, SHEET S-2.0 FOR BOTH THE FOUNDATION |
| | AND MEZZANINE BOTH REFER TO THE METAL BUILDING |
| | MANUFACTURER FOR THE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) 2ND REQUEST. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS DEFERRING THE |
| | ROOF PRESSURES AND WALL PANEL PRESSURES TO THE NUCOR |
| | BUILDING ENGINEER. NUCOR PLANS DOES NOT PROVIDE |
| | COMPONENT & CLADDING PRESSURES FOR ROOF ZONES NOR WALL |
| | ZONES. THERE STRUCTURAL CALCULATION SHEET A2 DOES SHOW |
| | VULT PRESSURES ( ASSUMED, CALCULATIONS DOES NOT STATE |
| | VULT OR VASD ) FOR ZONES 1, 2, & 3, SHEET A4 WALL |
| | PRESSURES FOR ZONES 4 & 5 AGAIN PRESSURES DO NOT STATE |
| | IF THEY ARE VULT OR VASD. NOTES ON BOTH SHEETS INDICATE |
| | AISI 2007 SPECIFICATIONS. IF THE NUCOR DESIGNERS ARE |
| | GOING FOR THE DOUBLE REDUCTION IN ALLOWABLE PRESSURES, |
| | THEY WILL NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH AISI 100-2007 |
| | D6.2.1A(A-G). INDICATE IF PRESSURES ARE VULT OR VASD |
| | AND IF THE REDUCTIONS ALLOWED BY AISI 100-2007 WERE |
| | TAKEN. |
| | |
| | WITHIN THE NUCOR PLANS SUBMITTED THERE ARE NO SECTIONS |
| | CIRCLED SHOWING WHICH APPLICATIONS WILL BE APPLICABLE |
| | TO THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | NOTE THE NUCOR PLANS C1OF 1 LIST VARIOUS FLORIDA STATE |
| | APPROVALS NONE HAVE BEEN CIRCLED. THERE ALSO WERE NO |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR EITHER THE WALL PANELS |
| | OR ROOF PANELS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE DESIGNER OF RECORDS COMMENTS AS TO |
| | THE DEFICIENCIES FOUND IN THE NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEM |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 1ST REVIEW. SHEET S-3.0 MISSING THE ROOF |
| | PRESSURES FOR THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING. PROVIDE THE |
| | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT THE PRESSURES WILL BE TAKEN AT. ALSO |
| | TAKE THE PRESSURES UNDER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING FOR 10 |
| | SQ FT. 107.2.1.2 FOR ROOF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THE |
| | CODE, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| | ILLUSTRATE, DESCRIBE AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING |
| | SYSTEM, MATERIALS, FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND WIND RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PRODUCT EVALUATION AND |
| | INSTALLATION SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND |
| | CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE OR A STATEMENT |
| | BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE MUST |
| | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8) SEMI- COMPLIED, THE PRESSURES PROVIDED ARE GOOD FOR |
| | A 170 VASD / 35 FT MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. WILL NEED TO |
| | DISCUSS WITH NUCOR TO SEE WHICH OF THE DESIGN |
| | PARAMETERS WILL BE USED FOR THE WHOLE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 9) UNABLE TO DETERMINE PRESSURES UNTIL THE WIND DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA IS DETERMINED BETWEEN THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | AND NUCORS ENGINEER. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF |
| | OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA |
| | DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 |
| | (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS |
| | THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| | (B) WINDOWS |
| | (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, WALL LOUVERS, |
| | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES |
| | |
| | 10) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 |
| | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | 11) COMPLIED |
| | |
| | 12) THE ENERGY CODE TOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE: |
| | 12A) 2ND REQUEST PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE SHGC |
| | VALUES TAKEN OF (0.50) UNDER THE TOTAL BUILDING |
| | PERFORMANCE ENERGY 506.3.1. |
| | |
| | 12B-F) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13) COMPLIED. IMPACT FEES. |
| | |
| | 14) NEW COMMENT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| | |
| | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| | ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO ANY REMODEL OR |
| | NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AFTER 7/1/14, AND THE TOTAL |
| | PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN |
| | $500,000. PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO. |
| | 4504-14, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF |
| | ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION |
| | 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A), THE ART ASSESSMENT IS |
| | 1% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST. |
| | |
| | PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE |
| | V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION 78-122, RENOVATION AND |
| | NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY, SO |
| | THE ART ASSESSMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL FUTURE |
| | PROJECTS. |
| | |
| | 15) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| | AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |