| Date |
Text |
| 2014-12-08 16:54:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 14110863 |
| | ADD: 5483 LEEPER DR |
| | CONT: ANDERSON MOORE |
| | TEL: (561)662-1819 |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: MON. 08/2014 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) TITLE SHEET T.100 UNDER THE HEADING OF PROJECT DATA |
| | LIST THIS STRUCTURES OCCUPANCY AS A FACTORY INDUSTRIAL |
| | GROUP F1 MODERATE HAZARD OCCUPANCY. |
| | THERE SEAMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY WITHIN THE TITLE SHEET, |
| | SEE THE TOTAL OCCUPANCY LOADS TAKEN THEY ARE EITHER FOR |
| | BUSINESS OR STORAGE OCCUPANCIES NOT A |
| | F1 OCCUPANCY. SHEET LS.100 ALSO LIST THE LARGE AREA AS |
| | A DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE NOT A FACTORY INDUSTRIAL |
| | OCCUPANCY. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE AREA BEING USED AS A |
| | DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE IS CONSIDERED A F1 OCCUPANCY? |
| | 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. FBC-B |
| | 306.2 FACTORY INDUSTRIAL F-1 MODERATE HAZARD AND SEE |
| | SECTIONS FBC-B 311.2 S1 OCCUPANCIES & 311.3 S-2 LOW |
| | HAZARD OCCUPANCIES. |
| | |
| | 2) DEPENDING ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF TYPE OF STORAGE |
| | OCCUPANCY S1 VERSES S2 FBC-B TABLE 508.4 MAY REQUIRE |
| | FIRE RATED OCCUPANCY SEPERATION WALLS. |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HAS NOT DECLARED HOW THIS |
| | STRUCTURE WAS DESIGNED SEE FBC-B : |
| | 508.2.5.1 FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED SEPARATION. |
| | 508.2.5.2 NONFIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED SEPARATION AND |
| | PROTECTION. |
| | |
| | 3) THE TITLE SHEET LIST THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL OF |
| | 28'-11"/ MAX. PROVIDED (50'). PLEASE REFER TO SHEET |
| | LS.101 THE MEZZANINE LEVEL FROM THE FURTHEST POINT ON |
| | THE MEZZANINE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS A MAXIMUM OF |
| | 100 FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FOR A STORAGE OCCUPANCY |
| | /SPRINKLERED 100 FT. FBC-B 1014.3 EXCEPTION 1 & 2. |
| | |
| | 4) THIS IS NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A WAREHOUSE, SHEET S-3 |
| | FOUNDATION NOTE # 9 THE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE |
| | FOUNDATIONS ASSUMES A MINIMUM SAFE BEARING VALUE OF |
| | 2,500 PSF. NO SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE A REPORT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: 2010 FBC-B |
| | 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. |
| | WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY |
| | OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE |
| | SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A |
| | GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. ALSO SEE |
| | 1803.6 REPORTING. |
| | |
| | 5) THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A METAL/ STEEL FRAME |
| | WAREHOUSE WITH WELDS AND BOLTABLE CONNECTIONS. THIS |
| | JOBSITE QUALIFIES FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,110.3.9 OTHER |
| | INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE, |
| | OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED |
| | BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS |
| | OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER |
| | INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR |
| | QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED |
| | FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT |
| | BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING |
| | AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE. |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY |
| | AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES: |
| | 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE |
| | FOOT |
| | 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR |
| | METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION (WELDING AND BOLTABLE |
| | CONNECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 5A) THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS WILL BE E-MAILED TO |
| | CONTACT [email protected] PLEASE FILE OUT THE |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS AND RETURN TO W.P.B. BUILDING |
| | DEPARTMENT CARE OF JIM WITMER. |
| | |
| | 5B) 110.4 INSPECTION AGENCIES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS |
| | AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT REPORTS OF APPROVED INSPECTION |
| | AGENCIES, PROVIDED SUCH AGENCIES SATISFY THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS AS TO QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. |
| | |
| | 5B) 110.5 INSPECTION REQUESTS. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF |
| | THE HOLDER OF THE BUILDING PERMIT OR THEIR DULY |
| | AUTHORIZED AGENT TO NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WHEN |
| | WORK IS READY FOR INSPECTION. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF |
| | THE PERMIT HOLDER TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO AND MEANS FOR |
| | INSPECTIONS OF SUCH WORK THAT ARE REQUIRED |
| | BY THIS CODE. |
| | |
| | 5E) SINCE THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR 3 SETS OF PLANS/ PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. 110.3.9. |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET S-3.0 INDICATES DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE METAL |
| | STRUCTURAL PORTION OF THIS BUILDING, UNDER THE 1ST |
| | REVIEW THERE WAS NO DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. |
| | NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION TO THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| | THAT DEALS WITH THE METAL SKIN AS TO THEIR DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA? WILL THE WHOLE BUILDING BE DESIGNED UNDER |
| | ASCE 7-10 OR WILL THERE BE OTHER DESIGN CRITERIA FOR |
| | THE METAL FRAMING AND CLADDING OF THE BUILDING. THE |
| | PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE, THERE ARE ALSO NO MEZZANINE |
| | DETAILS, SHEET S-2.0 FOR BOTH THE FOUNDATION AND |
| | MEZZANINE BOTH REFER TO THE METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER |
| | FOR THE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. |
| | 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS |
| | 8. STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE: |
| | WIND REQUIREMENTS /BUILDING ENVELOPE MISSING ROOF |
| | PRESSURES |
| | STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (IF REQUIRED) |
| | WALL SYSTEMS |
| | FLOOR SYSTEMS |
| | ROOF SYSTEMS |
| | STAIR SYSTEMS |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET S-3.0 MISSING THE ROOF PRESSURES FOR THE |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING. PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT |
| | THE PRESSURES WILL BE TAKEN AT. ALSO |
| | TAKE THE PRESSURES UNDER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING FOR 10 |
| | SQ FT. 107.2.1.2 FOR ROOF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THE |
| | CODE, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| | ILLUSTRATE, DESCRIBE AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING |
| | SYSTEM, MATERIALS, FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND WIND RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PRODUCT EVALUATION AND |
| | INSTALLATION SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND |
| | CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE OR A STATEMENT |
| | BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE MUST |
| | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET S-3.0 THE WALL PRESSURES FOR BOTH ZONES 4 & |
| | END ZONE 5 ARE LOW, THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT TAKEN AT 42 |
| | FT. ALSO NOTE THE CHART PROVIDES RANGES OF SQ. FT. |
| | (EXAMPLE 21 TO 50 SQ. FT ) FL CHARTS UNDER BOTH ASCE |
| | 7-10 AND 1609 ARE SPECIFIC 10 SQ. FT., 20 SQ. FT., 50 |
| | SQ. FT. IF YOU HAVE AN OPENING LETS SAY AT 30 SQ. FT. |
| | THAT IS WHERE YOU INTERPOLATE BETWEEN THE 2 PRESSURES. |
| | IF THE PRESSUES ARE BEING DERIVED FROM SOME OTHER |
| | SOURCE PLEASE PROVIDE THE SOURCE? |
| | |
| | 9) 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, |
| | 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING.FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF |
| | COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) |
| | SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT |
| | WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| | (B) WINDOWS |
| | (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, WALL LOUVERS, |
| | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES |
| | |
| | 10) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 |
| | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | 11) LIFE SAFETY SHEET LS.101 THE MEZZANINE LIFE SAFETY |
| | SHOWS THE SCALE AT 3/32 NDS THIS WOULD EXCEED TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCES, TYPO SCALE ABOVE FOR THE 1ST FLOOR PLAN IS |
| | 3/16 THS OF AN INCH. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, |
| | DISCREPANCY IN PLANS. |
| | |
| | 12) THE ENERGY CODE TOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE: |
| | 12A) PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE SHGC VALUES |
| | TAKEN OF (0.50) UNDER THE TOTAL BUILDING |
| | PERFORMANCEENERGY 506.3.1. |
| | |
| | 12B) WALLS IN ZONES 3 & 4 BOTH INDICATE THEY ARE IN THE |
| | NE WALL ZONES WHERE THEY ARE IN THE N.W., S.W. & S.E. |
| | CORRECT VALUES IN REPORT. TOTAL BUILDING |
| | PERFORMANCEENERGY 506.3.1. |
| | |
| | 12C) WINDOWS IN THE N. E. & N.W. WALLS BOTH INDICATE A |
| | 9'-0" TALL WINDOW IN THE ENERGY REPORT WHERE AS THE |
| | PLANS SHEET A-3.00 INDICATE THEY ARE 10'-0" TALL. |
| | CORRECT THE ENERGY REPORT FOR CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 12D) IN THE ENERGY REPORT WINDOWS IN WALL ZONES 3 & 4 |
| | ARE WRONG THEY ARE 22 FT. LONG BUT THE WINDOWS ARE ONLY |
| | 9'-2" TALL INTHIS SECTION. |
| | |
| | 12E) IN THE ENERGY REPORT THE INTERIOR WALLS FOR ZONES |
| | 3 & 4 ARE NOT CONCRETE WALLS SHEET A-1.01 IDENTIFIES AS |
| | A WALL MARKER TYPE P1 WALL, PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 12F) THE ROOFING INSULATION IS SHOWN IN THE ENERGY |
| | REPORT AS A MTL BLDG ROOF R-19, UNDER THE MATERIALS |
| | USED PORTION OF REPORT IT DECLARES A BUILT UP ROOF 3/8 |
| | INCHES, WITH 6 INCHES OF INSULATION TO MAKE A R-30.3 |
| | VALUE. |
| | NOTE ABOVE THE OFFICE AREA IS A NON-A/C MEZZANINE. WITH |
| | A 4 INCH CONCRETE DECK SEPARATING THE AIR CONDITIONED |
| | OFFICE SPACE FROM THE NON- A/C MEZZANINE, SHEET A7.00 |
| | DETAILS 1-3 SHOW 6 INCH INSULATION LAYED ON TOP OF THE |
| | DROPPED CEILING TILE.CORRECT VALUES. |
| | |
| | 12G) SHEET A7.00 DETAILS 1-3 SHOW 6 INCH INSULATION |
| | LAYED ON TOP OF THE DROPPED CEILING TILE. 2010 ENERGY |
| | 502.2.1.2 CEILING INSULATION. |
| | INSULATION INSTALLED ON A SUSPENDED CEILING WITH |
| | REMOVABLE CEILING TILES SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PART OF |
| | THE MINIMUM THERMAL RESISTANCE OF THE ROOF INSULATION |
| | UNLESS THE ROOF/CEILING CAVITY IS SEALED FROM THE |
| | EXTERIOR ENVIRONMENT. |
| | |
| | 13) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT |
| | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL |
| | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND |
| | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 14) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| | AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
