| Date |
Text |
| 2014-11-06 11:36:20 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | THE NATURE OF THE REMODEL REQUIRES AN EVALUATION OF THE |
| | FIRE ALARM AND SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR CODE COVERAGE AND |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARM AND/OR FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER SHALL REMAIN ACTIVE THROUGHOUT THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. |
| | |
| | ANY AND ALL WORK ON THE FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | SYSTEMS SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND |
| | BY CERTIFIED LIFE SAFETY CONTRACTORS. |
| | |
| | ANY TIME THAT WORK ON THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, |
| | SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM, EXCEEDS 4 HOURS, A FIRE |
| | WATCH SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL |
| | AND COMPLETE PROTECTION IS RETURNED. |
| | |
| | THE SUBMITTED PLAN LACKS THE REQUIRED DETAIL REGARDING |
| | LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS DEVICE LOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT |
| | LIMITED TO, SMOKE DETECTORS, SPRINKLER HEADS, AND FIRE |
| | ALARM DEVICES; BOTH EXISTING AND PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | WHAT IS THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY TYPE, RESIDENTIAL, |
| | BUSINESS OR OTHER? |
| | |
| | THE ROOMS ARE NOT LABELED AND IS THE DRAWING THE ENTIRE |
| | SPACE OR JUST A PORTION OF A LARGER SPACE? |
| | |
| | A LIFE SAFETY PLAN IS NOT PROVIDED, INDICATING ALL |
| | OCCUPANCY LOADS, EXIT PATHS, EXITS SIGNS(IF REQUIRED |
| | FOR BUSINESS), EMERGENCY LIGHTS(IF REQUIRED FOR |
| | BUSINESS) AND EXIT DOORS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ALSO REVIEW OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS. |
