| Date |
Text |
| 2014-12-23 13:42:04 | 12/23/14 ZONING FAILED |
| | |
| | 1. CARPORT DOES NOT MEET SETBACKS, POSTS ARE ONLY 2.3 |
| | FROM THE SIDE YARD. |
| 2014-12-22 08:21:15 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR DOORS ( FL-15180.40 ), THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS |
| | ( NOA NO. 12-0213.05 ) AND THE ALUMINUM TUBE MULLIONS ( |
| | NOA NO. 12-0221.09 ) HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY FBC |
| | 107.3.4. |
| | |
| | 3) THE INSTALLATION DRAWINGS FOR THE WINDOWS AND |
| | MULLIONS WERE NOT SHRUNK TO FIT ON THE 8.5" X 11" SIZE |
| | PAPER AND ARE MISSING INFORMATION. SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WITH COMPLETE DRAWINGS. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND FBC |
| | 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT EXPOSURE CATEGORIES |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. THE SHEET S-1 HAS "D" AND SHEET |
| | S-3 HAS "C". THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE EXPOSURE CATEGORY |
| | AND "C" IS THE CORRECT ONE. FBCR 301.2.1.1 |
| | |
| | 5) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | ALUMINUM ROOF PANELS THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED BY IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR |
| | THE PROJECT. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND FBC 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE |
| | CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
