| Date |
Text |
| 2015-09-01 10:22:52 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: THERE IS A NEW SET OF PLANS DONE BY ANOTHER |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. THEREFORE A COMPLETE NEW REVIEW IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 1- THE NEW PLANS SUBMITTED ARE REFERENCING THE 2014 |
| | FBC. THE ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICATION AND ALL REVIEWS |
| | WERE DONE BASED ON THE 2010 FBC. REVISE ALL PLANS AND |
| | NOTES AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- SPECIFY WINDOWS AND DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES. SEC. |
| | R301 |
| | |
| | 3- IMPACT FEES: NEED NEW SET OF PLANS RE-STAMPED BY |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY AND NEED COPY OF PAID RECEIPT. COPY |
| | OF PAID RECEIPT WAS NEVER SUBMITTED. COUNTY IMPACT FEE |
| | ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND PLANS NEED TO BE |
| | COORDINATED TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND UNNECESSARY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | A) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM. SEC. |
| | 103.2.3.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE INDIVIDUAL COMPLETING THE |
| | REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 405.4.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C) COMPLETE ALL THE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM: OWNER'S |
| | NAME, BUILDER'S NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION |
| | NUMBER. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D) COORDINATE WITH PLANS INSULATION FOR ALL WALLS |
| | (INCLUDING THE ADJACENT WALL SEPARATING THE GARAGE FROM |
| | THE A/C AREA.) SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) WALLS AND WINDOWS SHOWN PAGE 3 OF 5 DON'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE WALLS AND WINDOWS INFORMATION, INCLUDING |
| | ORIENTATION TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THE WINDOWS AND DOORS |
| | U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SHOWN ON ITEM #7 AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 405.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 6- R-30 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON A 2 X 6 AS SHOWN ON |
| | THE DROP CEILING PLAN. ENGINEER TO REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE R VALUE SHOWN ON THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ON ITEM #11 FOR THE DUCTS. SEC. 103.2..2 |
| | OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 8- PLANS DON'T SHOW THE R-VALUE FOR THE EXTERIOR WALLS. |
| | 103.2..2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FL14604-R3 SUBMITTED IS NOT APPROVED. THE APPLICATION |
| | STATUS SAYS "RE-APPLY". NEED COPY OF APPROVED PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC. |
| | |
| | 11- DROP CEILING PLAN: |
| | A) PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW IS THE DOUBLE 2X8 |
| | ATTACHED TO THE MASONRY WALL AND TO THE WOOD FRAMED |
| | WALL? . DROP CEILING SIDE VIEW DRAWING IS NOT CLEAR? |
| | NOTE: FASTENERS FOR THE MASONRY WALL ARE NOT THE SAME |
| | AS FOR A WOOD FRAMED WALL. HOW IS THE LUS28-2 ATTACHED |
| | TO THE 2X4 TOP PLATE?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) 2 X 6 LEDGER: SPECIFY SPACING OF THE FASTENERS. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
