| Date |
Text |
| 2014-12-22 16:58:14 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) THE WIND DESIGN DATA ON SHEET S-3 |
| | OF THE PLANS IS INCORRECT. THE WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH |
| | AND THE 2010 FBC REFERENCES ASCE 7-10. FBC R301.2.1 AND |
| | FBC-R CHAPTER 43 THE LOAD SCHEDULE ON S-3 WAS NOT |
| | CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 2) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) SPECIFY HOW THE BALCONY FLOOR AND |
| | WALLS WILL BE WATERPROOFED AND HOW THE RAIN WATER WILL |
| | BE DISCHARGED FROM THE SLAB FLOOR OF THE BALCONY THAT |
| | WILL BE BUILT INTO THE ROOF OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
| | FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR ON THE |
| | PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 THE OPENING WIDTH FOR THE GARAGE |
| | DOOR WAS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS AS 9'-8" WIDE AND |
| | HEIGHT WAS NOT SPECIFIED. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | GARAGE DOOR THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAS A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 9 |
| | FEET. THE OPENING IS TOO LARGE FOR A 9 FOOT WIDE DOOR. |
| | |
| | 4) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM THAT |
| | WAS SUBMITTED DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS FOR THE EXTERIOR |
| | WALL AND CEILING INSULATION. PLEASE CORRECT. THE PLANS |
| | SPECIFY AN UNVENTED ATTIC WITH R-20 INSULATION APPLIED |
| | UNDER THE ROOF DECK AND MINIMUM R-4.2 INSULATION ON THE |
| | WALLS. THE ENERGY FORM HAS |
| | |
| | 5) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD. FBC 107.3.4.1 THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WERE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE: |
| | - SLIDING GLASS DOORS |
| | - OUT SWING METAL DOORS (#8 & #9) |
| | - OUT SWING WOOD FRONT ENTRY DOOR (#7) |
| | - THE BALCONY WATERPROOFING MATERIAL ( CONCRETE AND |
| | WOOD DECKS ) |
| | - THE 53 INCHES WIDE CASEMENT WINDOWS ( NOA NO. |
| | 11-1114.22 HAS A MAXIMUM WIDTH LIMITATION OF 36 INCHES) |
| | |
| | 6) REVISE THE STRUCTURAL PLANS TO SHOW THE FOUNDATION, |
| | COLUMNS AND BEAMS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | CANTILEVERED BALCONY BASED ON THE CALCULATIONS AND |
| | DETAILS FROM THE ENGINEER. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) THE SLOPE OF THE BALCONY ROOFS COVERED WITH MODIFIED |
| | BITUMEN ROOFING ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/4" |
| | PER FOOT. FBC-R905.11.1 THE PLAN SPECIFIES 1/8" PER |
| | FOOT SLOPE. |
| | |
| | 8) THE MODIFIED ROOF COVERING NOTE ON SHEETS A-1 AND |
| | S-2 HAS AN ARROW POINTING TO THE BALCONY WITH THE WOOD |
| | DECK, BUT INCORRECTLY STATES CONCRETE DECK. THE |
| | CANTILEVER CONCRETE DECK IS THE ONE ON THE OPPSITE SIDE |
| | OF THE SECOND FLOOR. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT WAS |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
