| Date |
Text |
| 2014-08-21 16:39:47 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1. IN THE FUTURE, IF PLANS ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE, |
| | PLEASE WRITE "FOR REFERENCE ONLY" ON THEM. IN THIS |
| | CASE, THE PLANS WERE ROUTED TO ZONING AND ELECTRICAL AS |
| | I THOUGHT THAT THIS WAS A REVISION. THIS RESULTED IN A |
| | DELAY IN PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 2. REGARDING THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY |
| | CHRISTOPHER G. PLY, PE: |
| | |
| | SEE FBC 1609.1.1. WIND LOADS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE 7-10. EXCEPTION 7 IS FOR DESIGNS |
| | USING AASHTO LTS-4 FOR HIGHWAY LUMINARIES (PUBLIC RIGHT |
| | OF WAY). THIS IS NOT A HIGHWAY LUMINARY; THIS IS |
| | LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. SEE THE DECLARATORY |
| | STATEMENT DS2013-104 ISSUED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA: |
| | |
| | HTTPS://FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/BC/BC_LST.ASPX |
| | |
| | HTTPS://FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/UPLOAD/FBC/CODEID_7095_215C |
| | _DS2013-104--FINAL_ORDER--MILTON_ENGINEERING_CONSULTANT |
| | S.PDF |
| | |
| | 3. TITLE BLOCK INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 |
| | REQUIRED ON EACH SHEET. |
| | |
| | 4. THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED GIVE THE ASSUMED WEIGHT |
| | OF THE LUMINAIRE AS 0. PLEASE EXPLAIN AS THE LIGHT |
| | POLES APPEAR TO HAVE FIXTURES, SEE SHEET LABELED "SITE |
| | LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC." |
| | |
| | 5. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE FIXTURES, FBC 1609. |
| | FOUR DIFFERENT LUMINAIRES ARE SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 6. SOME PORTIONS OF THE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT ENTIRELY |
| | CLEAR. FOR INSTANCE, SECOND PAGE, "BENDING MOMENT OF |
| | LUMINAIARE = 0 FT LBS." ITEM (D), DEFLECTION TEST |
| | FORCE, INCLUDES A FORMULA BUT NO ACTUAL CALCULATION. IF |
| | THE FORMULA IS PROVIDED IN A DIFFERENT AREA THAN THE |
| | ACTUAL CALCULATION, PLEASE LABEL THE CALCS. FOR THE |
| | VARIOUS CALCUATIONS, THERE IS NO CONCLUSION OR |
| | INDICATION AS TO WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED COMPLIANT. AS |
| | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE REDONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE |
| | 7-10, CALCS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED IN DEPTH. PLEASE |
| | ENSURE THAT CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE CLEAR AS TO |
| | PURPOSE AND INTENT. |
| | |
| | 7. NO INFORMATION REGARDING SOILS BEARING REQUIREMENT |
| | WAS INCLUDED. PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION AS WELL |
| | AS A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT. ENGINEER TO ACKNOWLEDGE |
| | REVIEW OF THE SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT (SHOP DRAWING |
| | REVIEW STAMP OR REFER TO REPORT IN CALCULATIONS), FBC |
| | 1803.5. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
