| Date |
Text |
| 2014-11-13 12:30:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 14080632 |
| | ADD: 500 BELVEDERE RD. |
| | CONT: T. B. D. |
| | TEL: (216)520-1551 |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | DATE: THURS. NOV. 13/ 2014 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | PLEASE TAKE NOTE!!!! |
| | NOTICE: |
| | CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES STATES THAT A |
| | LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE |
| | FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED (3) OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION. |
| | THIS IS TO BE PAID BY THE DESIGN TEAMS!!!!. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2ND REQUEST , ORIGINAL SHEETS ARE STILL IN PLANS, |
| | RESPONSE COMMENTS START AT COMMENT # 4. |
| | 1) THE COVERSHEET INDICATES THIS BUILDING WAS DESIGNED |
| | AS A TYPE LLB BUILDING. HOW CAN THE EXISTING BUILDING |
| | BE A TYPE LLB BUILDING WHEN THE 2010 FBC-B 603.1 |
| | ALLOWABLE MATERIALS. COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE I OR II CONSTRUCTION IN |
| | THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTIONS 603.1.1 THROUGH 603.1.3: |
| | 1. FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED WOOD SHALL BE PERMITTED IN: |
| | 1.3. ROOF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING GIRDERS, TRUSSES, |
| | FRAMING AND DECKING. |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | SHEET S301 ALSO SHOWS EXISTING WOOD FRAMING MEMBERS AND |
| | SHEATHING DETAILS 2A, 2B AND CANOPY ROOF PLAN SHOW THE |
| | USSE OF NEW 3/4 INCH WOOD DECKING . THE EXISITNG |
| | BUILDING CODE SECTION 1001.2 CREATION OR EXTENSION OF |
| | NONCONFORMITY. |
| | AN ADDITION SHALL NOT CREATE OR EXTEND ANY |
| | NONCONFORMITY IN THE EXISTING BUILDING TO WHICH THE |
| | ADDITION IS BEING MADE WITH REGARD TO ACCESSIBILITY, |
| | STRUCTURAL STRENGTH, FIRE SAFETY, MEANS OF EGRESS, OR |
| | THE CAPACITY OF MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, OR ELECTRICAL |
| | SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 2) 2ND REQUEST. MISSING PRODUCT APPROVALS: 2010 FBC-B |
| | 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS |
| | & CLADDING |
| | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. |
| | 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION |
| | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(A) ACCESS DOOR IN CEILING A NORSTRUM CEILING |
| | APPROVAL HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. THE APPROVAL NEEDS TO BE A |
| | MIAMI-DADE NOA OR A STATE OF FLORIDA APPROVAL, |
| | OTHERWISE NORSTORM WILL NEED TO SUBMIT FOR A LOCAL |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | (C) COMPIED. EFIS SYSTEMS, |
| | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES, SUBMITTED IS A |
| | FLORIDA APPROVAL FOR CARLISLE SURE WELD TPO SINGLE PLY |
| | ROOF SYSTEM, THE COVER SHEET OF THE PLANS LIST PAGE 6 |
| | OF THIS REPORT FOR ATTACHMENT METHOD. PLEASE BE AWARE |
| | THERE IS 8 SUB-SYSTEMS FOUND ON PAGE 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY |
| | WHICH SUB-SYSTEM IS TO BE INSTALLED. EACH SUB-SYSTEM |
| | HAS DIFFERENT PRESSURES FOR ZONE # 1 AND MAY OR MAY NOT |
| | MEET THE WIND DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 3) 2ND REQUEST, SUB-SYSTEMS NOT IDENTIFIED. 2010 FBC |
| | 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REQUEST. SHEET S-001 UNDER THE HEADING OF WIND |
| | DESIGN DATA: |
| | MWFRS DESIGN PRESSURES- BUILDING DESIGN BY PUBLIX |
| | COMPONENTS & CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES IN VULT |
| | WIND PRESSURES FOR ZONES 4 & 5 (WALL ZONES) |
| | PRESSURES ARE LOW FOR WALL ZONE 4 |
| | PRESSURES ARE HIGH FOR WALL ZONE 5 @ 190 MPH. |
| | |
| | COMMENT BELOW CHART. |
| | NOTE. WIND LOADS FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING SHALL |
| | CONFORM TO THE FBC CRITERIA. THE CLADDING SUPPLIERS |
| | SHALL CONSIDER SHALL CONSIDER INCREASED PRESSURE |
| | COEFFICIENTS FOR THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING AND |
| | DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE WIND LOADS FOR THIER SYSTEMS |
| | BASED ON ZONE, HEIGTH AND EFFECTIVE WIND AREA. |
| | |
| | THE PRESSURES FOR BOTH ZONES 4 & 5 (WALL ZONES) SHOULD |
| | ALREADY REFLECT THE CORRECT PRESSURES FOR HEIGHT AND |
| | EXPOSURE. THE PRESSUES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM PRESSURES |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE WIND ZONE, EXPOSURE AND HEIGHT OF THE |
| | BUILDING. THE PRESSURES WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED FOR |
| | WALL ZONE 4. IF THE DESIGNER OF RECORD DESIGNS TO A |
| | HIGHER PRESSURE (WALL ZONE #5) THAT IS WHAT THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS HAVE TO MEET. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT SHEET S001 IN THE TITLE STRIP |
| | LISST THIS SHEET AS PUBLIX SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS. AS |
| | DISCUSSED WITH CMG ARCHITECTS THIS MORNING |
| | IT APPEARS THE THE PUBLIX ARCHITECTS SHOULS BE THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR PUBLIX. THE ISSUE HERE IS PUBLIX |
| | HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE REST OF THE SHOPPING CENTER. |
| | THE PUBLIX PERMIT IS THE NEW PUBLIX STORE AND CANOPY. |
| | THERE SHOULD BE A 3 HOUR WALL THAT SEPARATES THE PUBLIX |
| | STORE FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE SHOPPING CENTER. ON |
| | THESE PLANS OMIT THE PORTION THAT DEALS WITHPUBLIX/ |
| | UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. THIS SHOULD BE A STAND ALONE |
| | PERMIT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PUBLIX, UNLESS THEY |
| | ARE GOING TO BECOME THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE |
| | WHOLE OF THE SHOPPING CENTER. |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 61G1-23.015 RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISING |
| | CONTROL OVER ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE OUTSIDE OF THE |
| | ARCHITECT?S OFFICE. |
| | |
| | THE OTHER ISSUE WITH THIS PAGE IS THE STATEMENT UNDER |
| | GENERAL: |
| | THE ADDED STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS TO THE |
| | BUILDING IS DESIGNED TO BE SELF SUPPORTING AND STABLE |
| | AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS FULLY COMPLETED. |
| | AGAIN THIS TO BE CONSIDERED A ADDITION TO AN EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. THE DESIGN CRITERIA LIST THIS AS A TYPE IIB |
| | BUILDING SHEET A302, A303 & A304 ALL STILL LIST THE USE |
| | OF EXISTING 5/8 IN. EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD, AND SHEET |
| | A304 STILL LIST WOOD TRUSSES TO BE MODIFIEDFOR NEW |
| | METAL STUD ATTACHMENT. |
| | PLEASE REVIEW: 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE 1001.2 |
| | CREATION OR EXTENSION OF NONCONFORMITY. |
| | AN ADDITION SHALL NOT CREATE OR EXTEND ANY |
| | NONCONFORMITY IN THE EXISTING BUILDING TO WHICH THE |
| | ADDITION IS BEING MADE WITH REGARD TO ACCESSIBILITY, |
| | STRUCTURAL STRENGTH, FIRE SAFETY, MEANS OF EGRESS, OR |
| | THE CAPACITY OF MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, OR ELECTRICAL |
| | SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ALSO NOT THERE ARE NO ROOFING PRESSURES PROVIDED |
| | FOR ZONES 1, 2 OR 3. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE FOR ALL ZONES 1-5 THE PRESSURES IN VASD |
| | SINCE ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE STATED IN VASD. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: MISSING THE PRESSURES AND WIND DESIGN FOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.1 DETERMINATION OF |
| | WIND DESIGN- CHAPTER 6 OF ASCE 7-10. |
| | 1609.3 BASIC WIND SPEED FIGURE 1609.A-C |
| | 1609.3 WIND SPEED CONVERSION |
| | 4.1) THE BASIC WIND SPEED, VU, SHALL BE DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 1609.3.1 & ASCE 7-10 |
| | |
| | 4.2) AN IMPORTANCE FACTOR, FIGURE 1609 A-C, ASCE 7-10. |
| | |
| | 4.3) AN EXPOSURE CATEGORY SHALL BE DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 1609.4 & ASCE 7-10 |
| | |
| | 4.4) A HEIGHT AND EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT COEFFICIENT, * |
| | SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM TABLE 1609.7.2. ASCE 7-10. |
| | |
| | 4.5) COMPONENTS & CLADDING PRESSURES POSITVE & NEGATIVE |
| | TABLE 1609.2(2) . |
| | |
| | 5) 2ND REQUEST, THIS SHEET REFERS BACK TO SOILS TESTING |
| | FOR THE PUBLIX BUILDING. SHEET S001 FOUNDATION NOTES |
| | INDICATE A SOILS REPORT IS REQUIRED. 1803.5.2 |
| | QUESTIONABLE SOIL. |
| | WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY |
| | OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE |
| | SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A |
| | GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. |
| | |
| | 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A |
| | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT |
| | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, |
| | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE |
| | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
