| Date |
Text |
| 2014-11-26 15:25:11 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | |
| | THERE IS A SIMILAR EXISTING ALUMINUM STRUCTURE ATTACHED |
| | TO A BUILDING ON THIS PROPERTY TO THE N OF THE PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENT. THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A PERMIT |
| | RECORD FOR THIS STRUCTURE. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF |
| | THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED (FL 7621-R2) HAS NO |
| | EVIDENCE OF REVIEW BY TIMOTHYJ. MESSLER, PE, ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD. ADDITIONALLY, THIS PRODUCT IS FOR PANELS OF |
| | 4" OR 6" THICKNESS. THE MESSLER DRAWING SPECIFYS PANELS |
| | OF 3" THICKNESS. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | THE ROOF PANEL SPAN IS SHOWN AS 9'10" ON SHEET 2 AND |
| | 12'0" ON SHEET 3. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | DETAIL A, SHEET 3 SHOWS AN ALUMINUM I BEAM AS EXISTING. |
| | THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ACCURATE. PLEASE VERIFY. |
| | |
| | GENERAL NOTES COVER SHEET INDICATES A DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | OF -67 PSF WHICH EXCEEDS ANY MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PRESSURE |
| | OF THE ROOFING PANEL. ADDITIONALLY, EXPOSURE B IS |
| | CLAIMED BUT THE EXISTANCE OF A BASEBALL PARK TO THE |
| | EAST OF THE PROPERTY RESULTS IN AN EXPOSURE C. SEE THE |
| | ROOFING PANEL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SITE SPECIFIC REQUIRED |
| | DESIGN WIND PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | EXISTING BUILDING DATA ON SHEET 3 INDICATES THE TYPE OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION AS IIB AND THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT |
| | IS ALSO TYPE IIB. THE ROOF PANELS ARE NOT OF NON |
| | COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED FOR IIB. CONSIDER |
| | RECLASSIFYING THE STRUCTURE PER TABLE 503 |
| | |
| | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO |
| | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6710 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
