| Date |
Text |
| 2014-09-13 10:54:39 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1. OUR RECORDS DO NOT SHOW A PERMIT FOR THE FIRST FLOOR |
| | APARTMENT, REAR STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO SCOPE AND DO NOT MAKE |
| | REFERENCE TO A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. AS THE TUB WAS |
| | SHOWN AS "EXISTING", MY INITIAL REVIEW WAS DONE ON |
| | WINDOWS ONLY. PLANS DO NOT SHOW THAT THE ENTIRE FIRST |
| | FLOOR IS A GARAGE TO BE CONVERTED TO AN APARTMENT. |
| | |
| | ANYTHING WHICH WAS BUILT WITHOUT A PERMIT IS NOT |
| | "EXISTING." THE ISSUE OF THE REAR BUILDING HAS ALREADY |
| | BEEN BROUGHT UP IN THE PAST BY ANOTHER PLANS EXAMINER |
| | ON ANOTHER PERMIT. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE AN "EXISTING" PLAN FOR BOTH FLOORS. "EXISTING" |
| | IS TO SHOW CONDITIONS WHICH WERE LEGALLY PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A "PROPOSED" PLAN WHICH SHOWS ALL PROPOSED |
| | CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ITEMS WHICH MAY BE ALREADY |
| | INSTALLED BUT WERE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT A PERMIT. UNLESS |
| | PERMITTED, IT IS NOT "GRANDFATHERED" REGARDLESS OF WHEN |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION WAS DONE. |
| | |
| | PLANS ARE TO INCLUDE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE SELECTED, SEE |
| | FBC 2010 EXISTING BUILDING 101.5. THIS APPEARS TO BE |
| | BOTH AN ALTERATION AS WELL AS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. |
| | PLANS SHOULD INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION FOR AN ACCURATE |
| | PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS ONE EXISTING UNIT (2ND FLOOR), |
| | AND A NEW APARTMENT IS PROPOSED, BUT NO TENANT |
| | SEPARATION WAS SHOWN. ENERGY CALCS WERE NOT PROVIDED. |
| | INSULATION, WALL DETAILS, ETC. WERE NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | A COMPLETE CHECKLIST CANNOT BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME |
| | DUE TO THE AMBIGUITY OF THE PLAN PROVIDED. |
| | |
