| Plan Review Notes For Permit 14071212 |
| Permit Number |
14071212 |
|
| Review Stop |
M |
| Sequence Number |
4 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2015-01-21 14:50:54 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | | | | 4TH REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | MECHANICAL | | | | | | 1) BASED ON THE SURVEY THAT WAS SUBMITTED, THE FRONT | | | DOOR FACES WEST. ACCORDING TO THE LOAD CALCULATION THE | | | TOTAL COOLING LOAD IS 3.22 TONS FOR THE WHOLE HOUSE | | | WITH A WEST ORIENTATION. SYSTEM 1 HAS A TOTAL COOLING | | | LOAD OF 1.56 TONS AND SYSTEM 2 HAS A TOTAL COOLING LOAD | | | OF 1.66 TONS. FROM THE CALULATIONS IT APPEARS THAT BOTH | | | UNITS SHOULD BE 2 TONS AT MOST. THE PLANS SPECIFY A 2.5 | | | TON AND A 2 TON. THE 403.6.1.1 COOLING EQUIPMENT | | | CAPACITY. COOLING ONLY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SELECTED SO | | | THAT ITS TOTAL CAPACITY IS NOT LESS THAN THE CALCULATED | | | TOTAL LOAD BUT NOT MORE THAN 1.15 TIMES GREATER THAN | | | THE TOTAL LOAD CALCULATED ACCORDING TO THE PROCEDURE | | | SELECTED IN SECTION 403.6, OR THE CLOSEST AVAILABLE | | | SIZE PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT LINES. THE | | | CORRESPONDING LATENT CAPACITY OF THE EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | NOT BE LESS THAN THE CALCULATED LATENT LOAD. ( | | | ACCORDING TO THE LOAD CALCULATIONS A WEST FACING | | | BUILDING HAS THE LOWEST REQUIRED LOAD. WHY DO THE PLANS | | | SPECIFY EQUIPMENT THAT WAS DETERMINED TO BE WORST | | | CASE?) | | | | | | |
|
