| Date |
Text |
| 2014-10-22 17:10:48 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | COMMENTS ARE FROM PREVIOUS LIST. A RESPONSE LETTER WAS |
| | PROVIDED BUT THE PLANS WERE NOT REVISED. |
| | |
| | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL, CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE |
| | FOLLOWING - ***DO NOT RESUBMIT UNLESS COMMENTS ARE |
| | ADDRESSED*** |
| | |
| | VERIFY THAT DESIGN PROFESSIONALS HAVE INCLUDED FLOOD |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WHICH ARE |
| | BELOW 7'. |
| | |
| | THIS INCLUDES THE GATE AND THE HARDSCAPE. THE SAME |
| | PLANS WERE SUBMITTED, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT "ALL |
| | NEW ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT TO BE MOUNTED |
| | ABOVE 7' BFE. THE GATE AND HARDSCAPE ARE TO BE BELOW |
| | 7'. THEY ARE TO RESIST FLOOD LOADS, AND PLANS NEED TO |
| | BE REVISED TO STATE SUCH. |
| | |
| | SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS FOR ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. THE |
| | SAME ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WAS SUBMITTED. IT IS NOT AN |
| | ORIGINAL. |
| | |
| | FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, THE PREVIOUS COMMENT LIST IS |
| | BELOW: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IN THE |
| | FOLLOWING FIELDS: |
| | |
| | B6, FIRM INDEX DATE, 3/1/1979 |
| | B7, FIRM PANEL, 3/1/1979 |
| | SECTION D, MARK BOX REGARDING LATITUDE/LONGITUDE |
| | SECTION D, RAISED IMPRESSION SEAL REQUIRED |
| | SECTION D, COMMENTS, INCLUDE SOURCE OF |
| | LATITUDE/LONGITUDE PER INSTRUCTIONS |
| | |
| | 2. COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | BASED ON THE SPOT ELEVATIONS ON THE SURVEY, THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT IS BELOW THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS |
| | AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE DESIGNED TO RESIST FLOOD |
| | LOADS FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301. FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT |
| | ARE TO BE ABOVE BFE (7') OR TO BE FLOOD RESISTANT. GAS |
| | FIXTURES ARE PROPOSED BELOW BFE. PLEASE REVISE PLAN OR |
| | SUBMIT DATA WHICH DEMONSTRATES THAT PROPOSED FIXTURES |
| | WILL RESIST FLOOD LOADS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, I WAS UNABLE TO FIND ANYWHERE IN THE PLAN |
| | THAT THE DESIGNER INCLUDES FLOOD LOADS IN DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA. PLEASE REVISE PLAN. WHEN RESUBMITTING, SWAP |
| | OUT SHEETS WHICH HAVE CHANGED SO THERE ARE TWO COMPLETE |
| | COLLATED SETS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW THIS ITEM HAS BEEN ADDRESSED WOULD BE |
| | HELPFUL. IT APPEARS THAT NEW SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED, NEW |
| | INFORMATION, BUT NOT CLEAR HOW THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT RESIST FLOOD LOADS IF BELOW BASE |
| | FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7' HAS BEEN MET. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
