| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-09 16:04:34 | 7/9/2015 |
| | PROJECT: REAR STRUCTURE |
| | PERMIT#: 14061324 |
| | CODE: 2011EDITION OF THE NEC, FIFTH EDITION OF THE FBC |
| | , WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, |
| | FBC SUPPLEMENTS. |
| | 5TH ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | REVISE YOUR PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM ON |
| | PG A-4. INDICATE THE SIZE AND TYPE AND LOCATION OF THE |
| | UTILITY SERVICE ENTRANCE. IS IT O/H OR U/G? |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS AN INDICATION OF TWO PANEL?C? ON THE FLOOR |
| | PLAN. ONE IN THE KITCHEN OF THE REAR STRUCTURE AND THE |
| | OTHER IN THE CONNECTED GARAGE? CLARIFY THE ACTUAL PANEL |
| | NAMES AND LOACTIONS. REVISE THE RISER DIAGRAM TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | 3) PG A-5 INDICATES THE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF A |
| | PANEL FROM A BATHROOM WALL THAT IS BEING DEMOLISHED. |
| | THE NEW FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT DOES NOT INCLUDE AN |
| | ELECTRICAL PANEL. HOWEVER THE RISER DIAGRAM INDICATES A |
| | FEEDER TO A SUB PANEL IN THAT LOCATION. PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | AND INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE RELOCATED PANEL. |
| | |
| | 4) THERE ARE 3 100AMP BREAKERS INDICATED IN THE 300AMP |
| | MAIN PANEL. ONE SUB FEED INDICATES A ?? PVC CONDUIT |
| | WITH 3 #3 WIRES. THERE ARE SEVERAL ISSUES WITH THIS. 1. |
| | IT?S NOT POSSIBLE TO BE A ?? CONDUIT. 2. IF IT?S A PVC |
| | CONDUIT IT REQUIRES A GROUND WIRE FROM NEC 250.122. AND |
| | 3. IT CALLS OUT A THHN CONDUCTORS. THHN IS NOT APPROVED |
| | FOR WET LOCATION. AN OUTDOOR CONDUIT IS CONSIDERED A |
| | WET LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR EACH OF THESE PANELS. NEC |
| | 408.4 |
| | |
| | 6) THERE ARE SIMILAR ISSUES WITH THE NEXT CONDUIT TO |
| | THE NEW 100AMP SUB PANEL ?C?. THE RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS A |
| | 1? CONDUIT 3,#6 AND 1#10CU GRD. A #6 CU CONDUCTOR IS |
| | NOT APPROVED FOR A 100AMP OCPD. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ |
| | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED |
| | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE |
| | REVIEW. |
| | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, |
| | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] |
| | |
