| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-01 09:25:30 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION/ ADDITION FIFTH BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | NOTE: THESE COMMENTS APPLY TO FRONT AND REAR BUILDINGS. |
| | DRAWINGS A-1 TO A-5 SUBMITTED ARE FOR BOTH STRUCTURES: |
| | |
| | 1-VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES FEES. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT |
| | THAT DESCRIBES ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK. SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE |
| | BREAKDOWN FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK ON MAIN HOUSE AND SCOPE |
| | OF WORK ON REAR STRUCTURE). |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW ATTIC ACCESS WITH |
| | LADDER. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. ROOF FRAMING |
| | DETAILS NOT PROVIDED. ) |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE GARAGE DOOR COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND |
| | FASTENERS. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE STAIRS, HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAIL THAT MATCHES |
| | NEW PORCH. PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIVE LOADS |
| | OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY ALL |
| | FRAMING MEMBERS AND FASTENERS. (REPEAT COMMENT. THE |
| | FRONT ELEVATION IS NOW MISSING THE GUARDRAILS. THERE IS |
| | NOTHING TO COMPARE TO PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. HANDRAIL |
| | DETAIL SUBMITTED SEEMS TO BE FOR INTERIOR HANDRAIL. AND |
| | CLARIFY HOW ARE THE #12X3" WD. SCREWS TOP & BTM. @16" |
| | O/C INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE HANDRAIL DETAIL?. FLOOR |
| | PLAN ON SHEET A-1 CALLS FOR ALUMINUM RAILING. THIS |
| | DETAIL IS FOR WOOD RAILING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS). |
| | |
| | 5- WALL SECTION A/A-2: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW PROVIDING "CROSS |
| | VENTILATION" SEC. R806 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. SPECIFY SPACING OF THE 4"X7" SPECIFIED VENTS |
| | TO VERIFY CROSS VENTILATION.). |
| | |
| | 6- REVISE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. REVISE SIZE AND |
| | REVISE DETAIL TO SHOW FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R612.10.2.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. 2X4 BUCK DOESN'T |
| | PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME). |
| | |
| | 7- CLARIFY WHERE IS THE GAF MINERAL GUARD RESIDENTIAL |
| | ROLL ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT (NOA 13-1104.03) SUBMITTED |
| | GOING TO BE INSTALLED? SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8- CLARIFY WHERE IS THE GAF CONVENTIONAL BUILT-UP ROOF |
| | SYSTEM (NOA 13-1022.15) SUBMITTED GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. PLANS CALL |
| | FOR EXISTING FLAT ROOF ON REAR BUILDING. NO RE-ROOF. IF |
| | THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE RE-ROOFED, THEN NEED TO |
| | IDENTIFY SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED AND PROVIDE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF THE NOA. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) ROOF SHINGLES. (REPEAT COMMENT. NO PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED). |
| | |
| | B) SINGLE HUNG WINDOW. INFORMATION SUBMITTED DOESN'T |
| | HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER. PROVIDE THE |
| | CORRESPONDING FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | SUBMITTED PACKAGE OR MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL (COMPLETE ENGINEERING PACKAGE WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL). |
| | |
| | C) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS AND USP STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON FRAMING PLANS AND ALL DETAILS. |
| | OR SPECIFY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NEXT TO THE |
| | SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) LETTERING ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT LEGIBLE. SEC |
| | 107.2.1.4 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) MAIN SCOPE ON MAIN NOTES SPECIFY "FIRE DAMAGE |
| | REPAIRS". PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | THIS. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWING AREAS DAMAGED BY FIRE AND PROPOSED REPAIRS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 12- SHEET A2: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PORCH STEPS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R311.7.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) LETTERING ON SIMPSON STRAPS AND POST/CAPS SCHEDULES |
| | IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT'S TOO SMALL. SEC.107.2.1.4 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) CLEARLY COORDINATE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE SIMPSON |
| | STRAPS AND POST/CAPS SCHEDULES, ROOF FRAMING PLAN, |
| | PORCH SECTION AND DETAILS B/A2, C/A2 AND D/A2. THIS IS |
| | LIKE CUTTING AND PASTING INFORMATION BUT IT DOESN'T |
| | MATCH ACTUAL CONDITIONS. CHECK SIZES OF FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS, ACTUAL CONNECTIONS, CONNECTORS SIZES VS |
| | STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, ETC. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) PORCH SECTION: (1) CLARIFY FINISH GRADE LEVEL. 16" |
| | OR 24'. SEE FRONT ELEVATION. CLARIFY NEW CONCRETE PORCH |
| | SLAB CONSTRUCTION. PORCH SECTION SHOWS CRAWL SPACE |
| | BELOW THE SLAB. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION |
| | FOR UNDER FLOOR SPACE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R408 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND, NEED TO SHOW HOW IS THE SLAB |
| | ANCHORED TO THE EXITING WALL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. (2) SPECIFICATIONS CALL FOR (3)2X10 WD |
| | BEAM. ONLY 2 ARE SHOWN. (3) ROOF RAFTERS ARE 2X6. ROOF |
| | FRAMING CALLS FOR 2X8. (4) |
| | |
| | 13- SHEET A-5: |
| | A) NEW FLOOR PLAN CALLS WINDOW ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE AS |
| | "EXISTING WINDOW". PLANS ARE MISLEADING BECAUSE |
| | ACCORDING TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN THIS WINDOW IS NOT |
| | PLACED IN THE SAME LOCATION. CLEARLY SPECIFY IF THE |
| | WINDOW WAS REMOVED. IF IT WAS REMOVED, THEN THE SAME |
| | WINDOW CAN'T BE USED UNLESS PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | SAME WINDOW IS PROVIDED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 14- SHEET A4: THERE IS A NEW BILLIARD ROOM SHOWN ON THE |
| | FLOOR PLAN. THE ROOM SEEMS TO BE TOO SMALL FOR A |
| | BILLIARD ROOM. PROVIDE COMPLETE LAYOUT OF POOL TABLE |
| | SHOWING CLEARANCES TO PLAY POOL. NOTE: ORIGINALLY, THIS |
| | ROOM WAS DESIGNED AS A BEDROOM. PROVIDE CLARIFICATION |
| | WHY CHANGING THE BEDROOM FOR A BILLIARD ROOM THAT MAY |
| | NOT BE SUITABLE BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM. THE |
| | PROPOSED USE OF THIS ROOM MAY NOT BE SUITABLE BASED ON |
| | THE SIZE OF ROOM. SEC. 102.2CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
