| Date |
Text |
| 2015-04-13 12:48:53 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION/ ADDITION FOURTH BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | NOTE: THESE COMMENTS APPLY TO FRONT AND REAR BUILDINGS. |
| | DRAWINGS A-1 TO A-5 SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | 1- SITE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 DOESN'T MATCH SITE PLAN |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET A-5. AND IS MISSING THE CONNECTION |
| | (LAUNDRY ROOM) OF THE GARAGE WITH THE REAR BUILDING. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- SCOPE OF WORK SPECIFIED ON SHEET A-1 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | SCOPE OF WORK SPECIFIED ON SHEET A-5. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3- DESIGN DATA FOR WIND LOADS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 |
| | DOESN'T MATCH DESIGN DATA SPECIFIED ON SHEET A-5. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DESIGN DATA ON SHEET A-1 |
| | AND SHEET A-5 IS CONFUSING. INFORMATION FOR INTERIOR |
| | AND END ZONE IS REPEATED TWICE BUT THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ARE DIFFERENT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES FEES. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT |
| | THAT DESCRIBES ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK. SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW ATTIC ACCESS WITH |
| | LADDER. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY THE ALTERATION LEVEL |
| | TYPE OR COMBINATION OF LEVELS OF ALTERATION AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 401.4 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | C) CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH WINDOWS AND EXTERIOR DOORS ARE |
| | EXISTING AND WHICH ARE GOING TO BE REPLACED. IF |
| | REPLACING EXISTING BEDROOM WINDOWS, THEN SPECIFY |
| | EXISTING TYPE AND SIZE AND PROPOSED TYPE AND SIZE TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| | 604 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 7- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) |
| | FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED |
| | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. |
| | |
| | 8- COORDINATE LABELING NUMBERS OF BUILDINGS SHOWN ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN WITH LABELING OF BUILDINGS SHOWN ON |
| | SHEETS A-2 TO A-5. REVISE AS REQUIRED. CLEARLY MATCH |
| | BUILDING #1, BUILDING #2 AND BUILDING #3 WITH NUMBERS |
| | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET A-2: |
| | A) PROVIDE GARAGE DOOR COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE STAIRS, HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAIL THAT MATCHES |
| | NEW PORCH ON SHEET A-5. PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | LIVE LOADS OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND FASTENERS. |
| | |
| | C) INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE WOOD FRAMING DETAIL |
| | SECTION, WALL SECTION AND DOOR FRAMING SECTION DOESN'T |
| | MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH AND CLARIFY WHERE |
| | ARE THESE SECTIONS TAKEN AT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 10- SHEET A-3: |
| | A) WALL SECTION A/A-1: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW PROVIDING "CROSS VENTILATION |
| | IN BLOCKING" AS SPECIFIED ON THE WALL SECTION. SEC. |
| | R806 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. REVISE SIZE AND |
| | REVISE DETAIL TO SHOW FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R612.10.2.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | C) SIZE OF WINDOW SHOWN ON THE LEFT ELEVATION DOESN'T |
| | MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE FLOOR PLAN. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) REVISE WINDOWS AND DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES TO MATCH |
| | CORRECT DESIGN PRESSURES AS SPECIFIED ON SHEET A-1 AND |
| | A-5. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | E) RIGHT ELEVATION DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11- SHEET A-4: |
| | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY EXISTING AND PROPOSED WINDOWS AND |
| | EXTERIOR DOORS. (COORDINATE WITH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON |
| | SHEET A-3). SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) NEW FLOOR PLAN SHOWS "NEW BILLIARD ROOM" AND "NEW |
| | PLAYROOM". PREVIOUS PLANS SHOWED THESE ROOMS AS |
| | BEDROOMS. IT'S NOT CLEAR WHY THE ROOMS WERE REDESIGNED |
| | AS PLAYROOMS, BUT IF THE ROOMS ARE NOT DESIGNED AS |
| | BEDROOMS, THEN ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ON PLANS |
| | THAT THESE ROOMS CAN NOT BE USED FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 12- SHEET A-5: |
| | A) THIS IS NOT ALTERATION LEVEL 2. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEE SEC.401.4 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS MISSING INFORMATION: (1) |
| | PROVIDE WALL SECTION SHOWING WHERE IS THE NEW 2X8 WOOD |
| | LEDGER GOING TO BE ATTACHED TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | (2) SPECIFY LEDGER ANCHOR BOLT SIZE AND SPACING. (3) |
| | SPECIFY CEILING CLEARANCES. (4) SPECIFY BEAM SIZE. (5) |
| | SPECIFY ROOF PITCH. (6) SPECIFY ROOF SHEATHING SIZE AND |
| | FASTENER TYPE AND SPACING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 13- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF SHINGLES. NOA 11-0913.10 SUBMITTED WAS THE |
| | APPROVAL FOR ANOTHER PROJECT AND WAS REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED BY ANOTHER ENGINEER NOT THE ONE RESPONSIBLE |
| | FOR THIS PROJECT. AND NEED 2 COPIES. ONLY 1 WAS |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | C) OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SIZE |
| | OF GARAGE DOOR SPECIFIED ON PLANS. ALSO, NOA 12-0125.20 |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR ANOTHER PERMIT AND WAS APPROVED BY |
| | ANOTHER ENGINEER NOT THE ONE RESPONSIBLE FO THIS |
| | PROJECT. |
| | |
| | D) SINGLE HUNG WINDOW. NOA 11-1013.14 SUBMITTED IS NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | E) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | FRAMING PLANS AND ALL DETAILS. OR SPECIFY THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR SOME |
| | CONNECTORS, BUT NOT ALL OF THEM. |
| | |
| | 14- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: ENGINEER TO CLARIFY WHY THE SIGNATURE ON THE |
| | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVALS IS DIFFERENT THAT THE |
| | SIGNATURE ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | LETTER WITH EXPLANATION. CHAPTER 471 F.S. |
| | |
| | 15- ENGINEER IS USING OLD SEAL. NEED TO USE CURRENT |
| | SEAL WITH THE WORDING "LICENSE" NOT "CERTIFICATE". SEC. |
| | 61G15-23.001. F.A.C. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2015-04-09 11:46:23 | 1) I AM THOROGHLY CONFUSED AS TO THE SCOPE OF PLUMBING |
| | WORK BEING DONE AND TO WHICH STRUCTURE. |
| | NOTHING ON THE PLANS MATCH FOR THE PLUMBING. THE |
| | SANITARY RISER DIAGRAMS ON THE PLANS AND THE ONES ON |
| | THE 8 1/2 X 11 SHEETS DO NOT MATCH THE FLOOR PLANS. |
| | IDENTIFY ON THE RISER DIAGRAMS TO WHICH BULDING THEY |
| | APPLY. I CAN COMPLETE MY REVIEW UNTIL A SET OF PLANS |
| | ARE SUBMITTED THAT CLEARY REFLECT THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF |
| | PLUMBING WORK TO BE DONE. WPB AMEND. TO 201 FBC |
| | SEC.107.2.1. |
| | |
| | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW |
| | TIM LARGE |
| | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR |
| | 561-805-6692 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
