| Date |
Text |
| 2015-01-07 11:14:15 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY AND SITE PLAN. SHOW |
| | LOCATIONS OF A STRUCTURES AND DISTANCES TO PROPERTY |
| | LINES. FBC 107.2.1.3 |
| | |
| | 2) FBC-R 301.1 BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, AND ALL PARTS |
| | THEREOF, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAFELY SUPPORT ALL |
| | LOADS, INCLUDING DEAD LOADS, LIVE LOADS, ROOF LOADS, |
| | FLOOD LOADS, AND WIND LOADS AS PRESCRIBED BY THIS CODE. |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE SHALL |
| | RESULT IN A SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES A COMPLETE LOAD PATH |
| | THAT MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF ALL |
| | LOADS FROM THEIR POINT OF ORIGIN THROUGH THE |
| | LOAD-RESISTING ELEMENTS TO THE FOUNDATION. THE OPENING |
| | FRAMING DETAIL 1 ON SHEET 2 DOES NOT SPECIFY THE |
| | CONNECTORS FOR THE CRIPPLES BETWEEN THE HEADER AND THE |
| | TOP PLATE. |
| | |
| | 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF STATE OR MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR THE TRUSS ANCHORS, STRAPS AND CONNECTORS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. ALTERNATELY, THEY CAN BE |
| | LISTED ON THE PLANS IN AN ANCHOR SCHEDULE WITH THEIR |
| | FL# OR NOA NUMBER. |
| | |
| | 4) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE |
| | SUBMITTED WERE APPROVED BY STEPHEN A. GAYDOSH WHO IS |
| | NOT THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT. RICHARD |
| | BOYETTE IS THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 5) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK IS SPECIFIED AS $8500.00, |
| | WHICH APPEARS TO BE LOW. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE |
| | SIGNED CONTRACT. CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 |
| | |
| | 6) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR ASPHALT ROOF |
| | SINGLES AND A SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR, HOWEVER, NO |
| | ROOFING WORK OR GARAGE DOOR WAS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. |
| | PLEASE REMOVE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS PROJECT. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME AND CLARIFY THE |
| | SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
