| Date |
Text |
| 2014-10-11 10:11:48 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) TWO SETS OF NEW PLANS THAT ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE |
| | ORIGINAL ONES, WITH A DIFFERENT SCOPE OF WORK AND A |
| | DIFFERENT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL (ENGINEER) WERE |
| | SUBMITTED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE INTENT OF THIS SUBMITTAL. |
| | IF THE WORK THAT WAS SPECIFIED ON THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AND SHOWN ON THE FIRST SET OF DRAWINGS IS |
| | TO BE DONE, THEN SUBMIT PLANS FROM THE NEW DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD THAT CLEARLY SHOWS THE TOTAL SCOPE OF THE |
| | PROPOSED WORK. INCLUDE THE STRUCTURAL REPAIR DETAILS, |
| | THE ADDITION AND THE NEW EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | 2) THIS STRUCTURE'S FOOT PRINT AND LIVING AREA SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE (420 SQFT) IN THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER'S RECORDS DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE PLANS (1080 SQFT). THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE ANY |
| | RECORD OF THIS ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING ADDED. |
| | UPON COMPARISON IT APPEARS THAT THE UNFINISHED CARPORT |
| | AND STORAGE ROOM HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO LIVING SPACE. |
| | THE PLANS WILL NEED TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. FBC 107.2 |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE ROOMS ON |
| | THE PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY AND SITE PLAN. SHOW |
| | LOCATIONS OF A STRUCTURES AND DISTANCES TO PROPERTY |
| | LINES. FBC 107.2.1.3 |
| | |
| | 5) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED |
| | AND DATED BY THE OWNER/AGENT PER FBC ENERGY SECTION |
| | 103. |
| | |
| | 6) INDICATE ALL NEW OR REPLACED WINDOWS AND DOORS ON |
| | THE PLANS AND SPECIFY THEIR TYPES AND SIZES. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF STATE OR MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR THE TRUSS ANCHORS, STRAPS AND CONNECTORS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. ALTERNATELY, THEY CAN BE |
| | LISTED ON THE PLANS IN AN ANCHOR SCHEDULE WITH THEIR |
| | FL# OR NOA NUMBER. |
| | |
| | 8) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | 9) THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF +62.9 PSF AND -68.3 PSF FOR |
| | THE WINDOWS AND DOORS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS APPEAR TO |
| | BE HIGH FOR THIS STRUCTURE LOCATED IN EXPOSURE C WITH A |
| | 170 VULT WINDSPEED. THIS COULD REQUIRE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WITH HIGHER DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE DOORS |
| | AND WINDOWS. FBC R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 10) THE 2007 EDITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE IS |
| | INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED. THE 2010 FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | IS THE ONE THAT APPLIES. |
| | |
| | 11) THE SCOPE OF WORK STATES TO BRING THE MAIN HOUSE UP |
| | TO THE 2010 NEC. THE 2008 NEC IS THE CORRECT REFERENCE. |
| | 2010 FBC-R CHAPTER 43. |
| | |
| | 12) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK IS SPECIFIED AS $8500.00, |
| | WHICH APPEARS TO BE LOW. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE |
| | SIGNED CONTRACT. CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 |
| | |
| | 13) AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE AREA THAT WAS CONVERTED TO LIVING |
| | SPACE. |
| | |
| | 14) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR ASPHALT ROOF |
| | SINGLES, HOWEVER ROOFING WAS NOT INDICATED ON THE |
| | PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 15) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME AND CLARIFY THE |
| | SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
