| Date |
Text |
| 2014-06-24 07:36:09 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAVE |
| | NOT BEEN ADDRESSED : |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW ROOM. 2010 |
| | FBC ENERGY SECTION 401.2 |
| | |
| | 3) SPECIFY THE WALL AND CEILING INSULATION ON THE |
| | PLANS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND 2010 FBC ENERGY |
| | SECTION 401.2 |
| | |
| | 4) THE STUCCO ON THE WALL IS REQUIRED TO BE 7/8" THICK |
| | PER ASTM C 926. |
| | |
| | 5) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R703.6.3 WHICH REQUIRES A |
| | BOND BREAK BETWEEN THE EXTERIOR STUCCO AND THE |
| | WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER REQUIRED BY FBCR 703.1.1. |
| | |
| | 6) SPECIFY THE SOFFIT COVERING MATERIAL THAT WILL BE |
| | USED. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR 806.1 FOR ROOF |
| | VENTILATION. |
| | |
| | 8) SPECIFY THE CEILING COVERING MATERIAL ON THE PLANS. |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 10) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE NEW EXTERIOR DOOR |
| | AND WINDOWS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | |
| | 11) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR 301.2.1.2 WHICH REQUIRES |
| | LARGE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION FOR GLAZED OPENINGS. ( |
| | NEW COMMENT. THE REVISED PLANS SPECIFY HURRICANE |
| | SHUTTERS. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | AND AN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WITH A KEY PLAN. ) |
| | |
| | 13) THE VALUE OF WORK SPECIFIED ON THE APPLICATION OF |
| | $2500.00 IS LOW. THE VALUE IS TO BE THE COSTS OF ALL |
| | MATERIALS, LABOR, DESIGN COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT |
| | (THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE FOR THE WORK BEING DONE IS |
| | TO BE USED). CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 |
| | |
| | 14) IN ORDER TO HELP SPEED THE NEXT REVIEW, PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
