| Date |
Text |
| 2014-04-23 07:28:10 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 14040157 |
| | ADD: 1875 PALM BEACH LAKES SUITE # A05 |
| | CONT: TBD |
| | TEL: (561) 373-3902 KARI |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: WED. APRIL 23/2014 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) PB OUTLET MALLS: |
| | A LETTER FROM THE QUALIFIER OF BOTH THE SHELL |
| | CONTRACTOR (EMJ CORPORATION) AND TENANT BUILD-OUT |
| | CONTRACTOR MUST BE PROVIDED BEFORE TENANT BUILD-OUT |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, IF THE TENANT BUILD-OUT |
| | CONTRACTOR WISHES TO START WORK BEFORE THE SHELL WORK |
| | HAS RECEIVED A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION, AGREEING THEY |
| | WILL WORK TOGETHER TO ACHIEVE CODE COMPLIANCE. THESE |
| | DOCUMENTS WILL NEED TO BE SIGNED BY THE QUALIFIER. |
| | |
| | 2) PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN STAMPED WITH THE APPROVED STAMP |
| | FROM NEW ENGLAND DEVELOPMENT PALM BEACH OUTLET SKYE |
| | GROUP TENANT COORDINATION STAMP. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A01: |
| | |
| | 3A) PLEASE REVIEW THE OCCUPANT LOAD COUNT OF 910 |
| | PERSONS VERSES THE EGRESS PERSON COUNT WHEN TOTALED OF |
| | 747. DISCREPANCY. 910 PERSONS OCCUPANT LOAD COUNT TIMES |
| | (X) 0.20= 182.0 INCHES. |
| | |
| | 3B) EGRESS WIDTH PER 2010 FBC-B SECTION 1005.1 MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED EGRESS WIDTH. |
| | THE MEANS OF EGRESS WIDTH SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN |
| | REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION. THE TOTAL WIDTH OF MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS IN INCHES (MM) SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE TOTAL |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD SERVED BY THE MEANS OF EGRESS MULTIPLIED |
| | BY 0.3 INCH (7.62 MM) PER OCCUPANT FOR STAIRWAYS AND BY |
| | 0.2 INCH (5.08 MM) PER OCCUPANT FOR OTHER EGRESS |
| | COMPONENTS. THE WIDTH SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SPECIFIED |
| | ELSEWHERE IN THIS CODE. MULTIPLE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL |
| | BE SIZED SUCH THAT THE LOSS OF ANY ONE MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | SHALL NOT REDUCE THE AVAILABLE CAPACITY TO LESS THAN 50 |
| | PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED CAPACITY. THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY |
| | REQUIRED FROM ANY STORY OF A BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | MAINTAINED TO THE TERMINATION OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE SEE SHEET A1.2 WITH THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF 1080 |
| | OCCUPANTS, TOTAL OCCUPANTS = 1000 VERSES THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD OF 910 FOUND ON SHEET A01. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHICH OF |
| | THE OCCUPANT LOADS IS CORRECT, NOTE IF THE 1000 OR MORE |
| | IS CORRECT THE 2010 FBC-B TABLE 1021.1WOULD REQUIRE A |
| | 4TH EXIT WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE EXIT ACCESS THROUGH |
| | THE STOCK/ STORAGE ROOM QND WOULD NEED TO MEET |
| | THEFOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: |
| | 2010 FBC-B 014.2 EGRESS THROUGH INTERVENING SPACES. |
| | EGRESS THROUGH INTERVENING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | THIS SECTION. |
| | 1. EGRESS FROM A ROOM OR SPACE SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH |
| | ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS OR AREAS, EXCEPT WHERE |
| | SUCH ADJOINING ROOMS OR AREAS AND THE AREA SERVED ARE |
| | ACCESSORY TO ONE OR THE OTHER, ARE NOT A GROUP H |
| | OCCUPANCY AND PROVIDE A DISCERNIBLE PATH OF EGRESS |
| | TRAVEL TO AN EXIT. |
| | EXCEPTION: MEANS OF EGRESS ARE NOT PROHIBITED THROUGH |
| | ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS OR SPACES IN A GROUP H, |
| | S OR F OCCUPANCY WHEN THE ADJOINING OR INTERVENING |
| | ROOMS OR SPACES ARE THE SAME OR A LESSER HAZARD |
| | OCCUPANCY GROUP. |
| | 4. EGRESS SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH KITCHENS, STORAGE |
| | ROOMS, CLOSETS OR SPACES USED FOR SIMILAR PURPOSES. |
| | EXCEPTIONS: |
| | 1. MEANS OF EGRESS ARE NOT PROHIBITED THROUGH A KITCHEN |
| | AREA SERVING ADJOINING ROOMS CONSTITUTING PART OF THE |
| | SAME DWELLING UNIT OR SLEEPING UNIT. |
| | 2. MEANS OF EGRESS ARE NOT PROHIBITED THROUGH |
| | STOCKROOMS IN GROUP M OCCUPANCIES WHEN ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING ARE MET: |
| | 2.1. THE STOCK IS OF THE SAME HAZARD CLASSIFICATION AS |
| | THAT FOUND IN THE MAIN RETAIL AREA; |
| | 2.2. NOT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE EXIT ACCESS IS |
| | THROUGH THE STOCKROOM; |
| | 2.3. THE STOCKROOM IS NOT SUBJECT TO LOCKING FROM THE |
| | EGRESS SIDE; AND |
| | 2.4. THERE IS A DEMARCATED, MINIMUM 44-INCH-WIDE (1118 |
| | MM) AISLE DEFINED BY FULL- OR PARTIAL-HEIGHT FIXED |
| | WALLS OR SIMILAR CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL MAINTAIN THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH AND LEAD DIRECTLY FROM THE RETAIL AREA |
| | TO THE EXIT WITHOUT OBSTRUCTIONS. |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A2.3 SHOWS THE MEZZANINE AREA, 1ST AND 2ND |
| | FLOOR, THE 2 HOUR FIRE RATED WALL ASSMBLY, BUT THE DOOR |
| | LEADING FROM THE 2 HR WALL ASSEMBLY TO THE GENERAL |
| | SALES FLOOR IS NOT IDENTIFIED. PLEASE REFER TO SHEET |
| | A3.2 THE DOOR SCHEDULE AND REVIEW ALL THE DOORS 1ST AND |
| | 2ND FLOOR ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR THIS AREA THEY ARE |
| | ALL WRONG. NO FIRE RATING FOUND FOR THIS DOOR. SHEET |
| | A7.2 DOORS MATCH THE SCHEDULE BUT DOOR 123 DOES NOT |
| | HAVE A 1 1/2 HR FIRE RATING. SEE OPENING PROTECTIVES |
| | 2010 FBC-B TABLE 7.15 |
| | |
| | 6) THE PLANS ALSO SHOW A VERTICAL LIFT BUT NO PRODUCT |
| | INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON THE LIFT. 2010 FL |
| | ACCESSIBILITY CODE 221.1.1 FLORIDA VERTICAL |
| | ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | NOTHING IN THIS CODE RELIEVES THE OWNER OF ANY |
| | BUILDING, STRUCTURE, OR FACILITY GOVERNED BY THIS CODE |
| | FROM THE DUTY TO PROVIDE VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL |
| | LEVELS ABOVE AND BELOW THE OCCUPIABLE GRADE LEVEL, |
| | REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE |
| | DESIGN REQUIRE AN ELEVATOR TO BE INSTALLED IN SUCH |
| | BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR FACILITY. |
| | |
| | 2010 FL ACCESSIBILITY CODE 408 LIMITED-USE / |
| | LIMITED-APPLICATION ELEVATORS 408.1 GENERAL. |
| | LIMITED-USE/LIMITED-APPLICATION ELEVATORS SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH 408 AND WITH ASME A17.1 (INCORPORATED BY |
| | REFERENCE, SEE ?REFERENCED STANDARDS? IN CHAPTER 1). |
| | THEY SHALL BE PASSENGER ELEVATORS AS CLASSIFIED BY ASME |
| | A17.1. ELEVATOR OPERATION SHALL BE AUTOMATIC. |
| | |
| | 7) NEITHER A2.3, A7.2 NOR E2.1 SHOW ANY SMOKE ALARMS IN |
| | THE STAIRWWELL CORRIDOR CEILING OR ON THE ADJACENT |
| | CORRIDOR CEILING # 113. THIS WAS A REQUEST FROM BOTH |
| | BUILDING & FIRE SINCE THE MEZZANINE DESIGN WAS A HYBRID |
| | SYSTEM, WITH A OCCUPANT LOAD GRATER THAN 10, THE 2 HOUR |
| | FIRE RATING AROUND THE STAIR CORRIDOR AND EXIT DOOR TO |
| | THE EXTERIOR WERE ALSO PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS SINCE |
| | THE PLANS LACKED 2 MEANS OF EGRESS THIS DESIGN WAS A |
| | EQUIZALENCY TO UNDER ALTERNANTE MATERIALS AND METHODS. |
| | |
| | 8) HIGH PILE STORAGE RACKING SYSTEM DOES NOT PROVIDE |
| | HOW CLOSE THE FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE TO THE RACKING SYSTEM |
| | WITH THE BOXED CONTENCE ON THE TOP OF THE RACK. |
| | THERE ARE NO MANUFACTURERS INSTALATION INSTRUCTIONS, |
| | MAXIMUM LOADING OF RACKS NOR IS THERE INFORMATION AS TO |
| | THE ANCHORING OF THE RECK SYSTEMS. |
| | 2010 FBC-B 413.1 GENERAL. HIGH-PILED STOCK OR RACK |
| | STORAGE IN ANY OCCUPANCY GROUP SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
