| Date |
Text |
| 2014-09-04 13:58:15 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ****PLAN REVIEW IN PROGRESS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE |
| | CONTRACTOR CONTACT: [email protected] , |
| | ARCHITECT: MSA ARCHITECTS, INC., JOSE I. SAUMELL, |
| | [email protected] |
| | ENGINEER: BBM STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, JOEL R. |
| | MIDDLEBROOKS PE [email protected] |
| | CONTACT: NEYITA LEIVA, LICENSE & PERMIT SERVICES: |
| | [email protected] 561-856-6655 |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENT: IN THE CASE OF REDLINES, PLEASE |
| | INCORPORATE INTO ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S SHEETS AS |
| | APPLICABLE. THESE REDLINED/REVISE SHEETS DO NOT NEED TO |
| | BE SUBMITTED UNLESS REQUESTED IN THE COMMENT/PROVISO OR |
| | UNLESS THE SHEET IS REVISED IN THE FUTURE. IF THE SHEET |
| | CHANGES DUE TO ANOTHER REVIEWER'S COMMENT, PLEASE |
| | INCORPORATE REDLINES/NOTES. |
| | PROVISO - SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE, AWNINGS |
| | PROVISO - PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| | WILL BE SUBMITTED AT A FUTURE DATE PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION, NO FEE. THEY ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | PROVISO - PRODUCT DATA TEST REPORTS REVIEWED BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR FLOORING ACOUSTIC INSULATION |
| | WILL BE PROVIDED AT A FUTURE DATE PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION, NO FEE (FBC 1207.2, 1207.3, 603.1 FLAME |
| | SPREAD LESS THAN 200) |
| | PROVISO - DUROLAST NOA PROVIDED. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | PROPOSED AND RAS117 CALCULATIONS (IF REQUIRED) TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH ROOF PERMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. C02 AND OTHER SHEETS, SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON |
| | MULTIPLE LOTS AS WELL AS A STREET/ALLEY TO BE |
| | ABANDONED. APPLICANT HAS INFORMED THAT A PLAT HAS BEEN |
| | FILED. PLEASE ADVISE WHEN THIS PROCESS IS COMPLETE, FBC |
| | CHAPTERS 5, 6, 7. |
| | |
| | 2 - 4. OK |
| | |
| | 5, 6, 8. SHEET SD1, THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN |
| | REDLINED/ADDED TO THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7, 9-12. OK |
| | |
| | 13. PILES ARE NOT TO BE INSTALLED PER RESPONSE LETTER |
| | AND PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROVIDED FOR FOUNDATION |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. SEE SHEET S5.1, TYPICAL CONCRETE |
| | COLUMN. THIS DETAIL SHOWS A PILE CAP, PLEASE CLARIFY OR |
| | REMOVE FROM DETAIL. |
| | 2ND REVIEW, GRAPHIC REMOVED BUT NOTE STILL INDICATES |
| | TOP OF PILE CAP. PLEASE REMOVE NOTE. |
| | |
| | 14. 2ND REVIEW, FLOOR LIVE LOAD VALUES HAVE BEEN ADDED, |
| | LOCATIONS INDICATED ON NOTE D2 ON SHEET S0.1. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING: |
| | FOUNDATION DESIGN SHEET S1.1A IS INCLUDED IN NOTE D2 |
| | BUT DESIGN LOAD VALUES NOT INCLUDED ON SHEET S1.1A. |
| | SHEET S1.2A AND OTHER SHEETS, 50 IS SHOWN FOR OFFICE |
| | LIVE LOAD. SEE FBC TABLE 1607.1, ITEMS 25 (OFFICE |
| | BUILDINGS) AND 27 (RESIDENTIAL). 25 OFFICE BUILDINGS, |
| | LOBBIES ARE TO BE 100. SEE 27, HOTELS AND MULTIFAMILY |
| | DWELLINGS, PUBLIC ROOMS TO BE 100. IT APPEARS THAT |
| | ALTHOUGH SOME OFFICE SPACE MAY BE 50, OTHER AREAS SUCH |
| | AS THE LOBBY AREA, BAR, GYMNASIUM (ITEM 18) ARE TO BE |
| | 100. |
| | THE FLOOR LOAD FOR CONFERENCE ROOM NOT CLEAR. ALTHOUGH |
| | THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS BUSINESS, THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD SHOULD CONFORM TO FBC TABLE 1004.1.1 UNLESS |
| | DESIGNER IS USING THE EXCEPTION, IN WHICH CASE THIS |
| | SHOULD BE STATED. AS AN ASSEMBLY USE AREA, IT APPEARS |
| | THAT FLOOR LOAD SHOULD BE 100. |
| | SEE ALSO FBC 1607.4. IN OFFICE AREAS WHERE PARTITION |
| | AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, PROVISIONS FOR THE |
| | PARTITION WEIGHTS ARE TO BE MADE UNLESS SPECIFIED LIVE |
| | LOAD EXCEEDS 80PSF. SECOND FLOOR/AMENITY AREA SHOWS |
| | UNFINISHED FUTURE USE AREA. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT |
| | INTENDED FUTURE USE WILL BE OR WHAT THE LIVE LOAD HAS |
| | BEEN DESIGNED TO. |
| | LOADS FOR OTHER AREAS SUCH AS TREATMENT ROOM, SEATING |
| | AREA (2ND FLOOR) NOT SHOWN. SEE ALSO ITEM 4, ASSEMBLY |
| | AREAS, LOBBIES, OTHER AREAS, AND FIXED SEATS. |
| | 30 ROOF. PLEASE SEE TABLE 1607.1, 300 CONCENTRATED |
| | REQUIRED WHERE ROOF SURFACE IS SUBJECT TO MAINTENANCE |
| | WORKERS. AS THIS BUILDING HAS ROOFTOP UNITS, IT WILL BE |
| | SUBJECT TO MAINTENANCE WORKERS AT SOME POINT. 100 PSF |
| | REQUIRED FOR ROOF USED FOR ASSEMBLY PURPOSES, SPECIAL |
| | PURPOSES TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON UPSE, SEE NOTE L. |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE AREAS LISTED ARE NOT CLEAR, |
| | PLEASE REVISE TABLE. |
| | NOTE D2 STATES THAT 5TH FLOOR DESIGN LOAD IS ON SHEET |
| | S1.5A. THIS PAGE IS FOR 7TH FLOOR. CORRIDOR LIVE LOAD |
| | DROPS FROM 100 (FLOORS 2 THROUGH 4) TO 40 PSF. CONFIRM |
| | THAT THS IS DESIGN INTENT. PLEASE CORRECT PAGE |
| | REFERENCES. |
| | NOTE D2 STATES THAT 6TH FLOOR DESIGN LOAD IS ON SHEET |
| | S1.6A. THIS SHEET IS FOR THE 8TH FLOOR. |
| | CORRIDOR LIVE LOAD IS 100 FOR 8TH FLOOR. THE NOTE D2 IS |
| | NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE FLOORS, PLEASE CORRELATE. 5TH |
| | AND 6TH FLOOR ARE NOT ON THE PAGES STATED, 7TH FLOOR |
| | SHOULD BE S1.7A BUT IS PARTIAL ROOF, S1.8A AND S1.9A |
| | ARE REFERRED TO IN NOTE D2 (SHEET S0.1) BUT ARE NOT IN |
| | THE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE AND CLARIFY FLOOR DESIGN LIVE |
| | LOADS. |
| | |
| | 15. SHEETS S1.2A, S1.5A INCLUDE THE RESIDENTIAL AND |
| | PARKING GARAGE FLOOR LOADS BUT OTHERS WHICH ARE |
| | APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT WERE NOT SPECIFIED, FBC |
| | 1603.1.1. THE FLOOR LOADS FOR COMMON AREAS AND OFFICE |
| | AREAS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE TABLE, PLEASE REVISE, |
| | FBC TABLE 1607.1. |
| | NOT ALL COMMON AREAS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, SEE ITEM 14 |
| | FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS. RESPONSE LETTER REFERS TO SHEETS |
| | 1.1A TO 1.9A BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE SHEETS S1.8A AND |
| | S1.9A, ALSO THESE SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE INDEX. |
| | |
| | 16. OK. |
| | |
| | 17. 2ND REVIEW, REQUEST FOR DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ROOF |
| | C&C. DESIGN PRESSURES CONFLICT WITH THE PLAN. SHEET |
| | S1.8 FOR ROOF PRESSURES REFER TO A BUILDING HEIGHT OF |
| | <= 60?, THE ROOF HEIGHT EXCEEDS 60?, PLEASE REVISE ROOF |
| | HEIGHT AND PRESSURES AS APPLICABLE. |
| | ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES TREAT ZONE 3 AS ZONE 2. PLEASE |
| | SEE ASCE7010, FIGURE 30.6-1, FOOTNOTE , PARAPET TO BE |
| | EQUAL TO OR HIGHER THAN 3FT. DETAIL A A7.1 APPEARS TO |
| | SHOW A 2FT PARAPET AT STAIR 1, PLEASE CLARIFY OR |
| | INCLUDE ZONE 3 PRESSURES. REVISE ROOF PLAN TO CLARIFY |
| | WHERE HIGHER ZONE 3 DESIGN PRESSURES ARE REQUIRED. |
| | ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURE PROVIDED. WHERE ARE THE |
| | ?GROSS UPLIFT PRESSURES? ZONES 1, 2, AND 3 TO BE |
| | APPLIED, AS OPPOSED TO ?ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURES? |
| | ZONES 1, 2, AND 3? ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | LOWER, DO NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH ROOFING COMPONENT |
| | AND CLADDING PRESSURES. CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 18. OK |
| | |
| | 19. REVISE LIFE SAFETY CALCULATIONS AS FOLLOWS: |
| | SHEET A0.1.1, THE CONFERENCE ROOM ALLOCATES 110 SF PER |
| | OCCUPANT, WHICH RESULTS IN AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 3. |
| | ALTHOUGH THIS CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS BUSINESS PER FBC |
| | 303.1, THE DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD SHOULD CONFORM TO FBC |
| | 1004 (15 SF PER OCCUPANT) UNLESS DESIGNER IS USING THE |
| | EXCEPTION. IF THE EXCEPTION IS THE INTENT, PROVIDE |
| | RATIONALE FOR REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD AND THIS MUST BE |
| | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. IT APPEARS THAT USE |
| | OF THE TABULAR OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD RESULT IN AN |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20, AND EXITING APPEARS COMPLIANT FOR |
| | THE ADDITIONAL OCCUPANTS. |
| | SHEET A0.1.2, THERAPY ROOMS HAVE NA FOR LOAD FACTOR, |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 2. THERE ARE TWO THERAPY ROOMS. 276 |
| | SF, IT WOULD APPEAR THAT DESIGN LOAD SHOULD BE AT LEAST |
| | 4 OR 6 (TWO OR THREE PEOPLE PER ROOM). THE WORD THERAPY |
| | IMPLIES A THERAPIST AND A GUEST; SOME SPAS HAVE TWO |
| | EMPLOYEES TO ONE GUEST. TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 2 FOR |
| | TWO THERAPY ROOMS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE AN ACCURATE |
| | DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| | NOTE THAT PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | ON A2.1.1 CONFLICT WITH A0.1.2. PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 20-21. OK |
| | |
| | 22. PREVIOUS LIST REQUESTED EGRESS CAPACITY |
| | CALCULATIONS. ALTHOUGH TOTAL NUMBERS WERE PROVIDED, |
| | CAPACITY PER DOOR WAS NOT PROVIDED. SEE EXIT GATE AT |
| | OLIVE, WHICH IS A COMPONENT IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE, NOT |
| | CLEAR HOW MANY OCCUPANTS THIS IS DESIGNED TO |
| | ACCOMMODATE, FBC 1008.1. RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT |
| | LOSS OF ANY ONE EXIT WILL NOT REDUCE CAPACITY BY LESS |
| | THAN 50%, BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW MANY OCCUPANTS ARE |
| | AFFECTED BY THE OLIVE AVE GATE. REVISE PLAN IN THIS |
| | AREA TO SHOW NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS PER EXIT AND EXIT |
| | DISCHARGE. |
| | |
| | 23-28. OK |
| | |
| | 29. OCCUPANT LOAD AND EXIT REQUIREMENTS/COMPLIANCE |
| | REQUESTED FOR ALL FLOORS. SEE A0.1.4. THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | TABLE IS MARKED GROUND FLOOR, BUT IS FOR THE |
| | RECREATIONAL ROOF DECK. SEE FBC 1004.1.1, OCCUPANTS TO |
| | BE DETERMINED BY TABLE 1004.1.1 UNLESS APPROVED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL. NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS STATED FOR THIS |
| | ASSEMBLY AREA ARE VERY LOW. FOR INSTANCE, TENNIS COURT, |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 4. OCCUPANCY LISTED IN THE TABLE FOR |
| | ?BOUNCE COURT? (BOCCE COURT?) IS 8, RUN TRACK IS 2. |
| | PROVISIONS HAVE NOT BEEN MADE FOR OCCUPANTS WAITING FOR |
| | USE OF THE COURTS, SPECTATORS, COACHES. THE ENTIRE |
| | ROOFTOP RECREATIONAL DECK HAS A STATED OCCUPANT LOAD OF |
| | 26 FOR A SQUARE FOOT AREA OF 15,950 SQUARE FEET, WHICH |
| | RESULTS IN OVER 600SF PER PERSON FOR AN ASSEMBY |
| | OCCUPANCY. THIS APPEARS TO BE TOO LOW. PROVIDE A LETTER |
| | OF RATIONALE FOR SUCH A LOW OCCUPANT LOAD FOR BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL?S CONSIDERATION OR INCREASE THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE TABLE. |
| | PAST SIMILAR USES HAVE INCLUDED COACHES, SPECTATORS, |
| | INDIVIDUALS WAITING FOR USE OF THE AMENITIES, JUDGES OR |
| | REFERREES. OTHER SIMILAR BUILDINGS USE ROOFTOP AREAS AS |
| | TEMPORARY PARTY OR FUNCTION AREAS, UTILIZING TEMPORARY |
| | TENTS. IN REQUESTING A REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD FROM THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL, ALL OF THESE ISSUES/POSSIBLE |
| | SCENARIOS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. |
| | ALTHOUGH THE FBC PROVIDES AN EXCEPTION FOR USING DESIGN |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | RATHER THAN THE OCCUPANT LOAD PER TABLE FBC 1004, |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT A REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD ALSO BE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED BY FIRE. |
| | |
| | 32. OK |
| | |
| | 33. PREVIOUS COMMENT REQUESTED DOOR INFORMATION, |
| | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES SHEETS WHERE DOOR IDENTIFIERS |
| | HAVE BEEN INCLUDED BUT NOT ALL OF THE DOORS ARE ON THE |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE. FOR INSTANCE, DOORS AT YOGA GROUP |
| | EXERCISE, CH101A AND CH101B DO NOT APPEAR ON THE DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE ON SHEET A5.1.6. DOOR SCHEDULE STARTS AT DOOR |
| | 138, CORRIDOR ; UNABLE TO LOCATE AMENITY AREA DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE. PLEASE ADD TO SCHEDULE. |
| | DOOR 154.2, SHEET A5.1.1, APPEARS TO SERVE AN ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN 50, SEE FBC 1008.1.10, FIRE |
| | OR PANIC EXIT HARDWARE REQUIRED. VERIFY ALL. |
| | GATES ARE TO MEET THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS DOORS, FBC |
| | 1008.2. PLEASE INCLUDE THE GATE INFORMATION IN THE DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE FOR COMPONENTS SERVING IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | AROUND THE POOL AREA. |
| | |
| | 34-39. OK |
| | |
| | 40. A 5.1.5 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE PUBLIC AREAS HAS BEEN |
| | COMPLETED BUT REFERS TO ID SHEETS WHICH WERE NOT |
| | SUBMITTED. FOR BUILDING REVIEW PURPOSES, THIS |
| | INFORMATION CAN BE SUBMITTED AT A FUTURE DATE BUT ALL |
| | INTEIROR FINISHES TO COMPLY WITH FBC CHAPTER 8. ITEM 7 |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 803.9, PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 41-45. OK |
| | |
| | 46. A0.1.1, THE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENT REGARDING |
| | NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS PER DOOR IS THAT THE OCCUPANT LOADS |
| | ARE SO SMALL THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO MARK EACH DOOR. I |
| | AGREE IN MOST INSTANCES, THE EXCEPTION BEING THE SINGLE |
| | GATE AT OLIVE AVENUE, SEE OTHER COMMENTS AND FIRE |
| | COMMENTS. ALSO MORE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE AMENITY ROOFTOP AREA, SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 47-49. |
| | |
| | 50. A3.1.1 AND OTHER ELEVATION SHEETS, ITEM 5 SHOWS |
| | FOAM BACKED TRIM WHICH APPEARS TO EXTEND ABOVE 40FT |
| | (SEE VERTICAL ORIENTED TRIM WHICH EXTENDS FROM 4TH |
| | FLOOR TO UPPER FLOOR, SEE PLAN MARKUP) FBC 1406.2.2. |
| | THIS WAS CHANGED ON SHEET A3.1.1 BUT WAS NOT CHANGED ON |
| | A3.1.2. THE STAIR TRIM DETAIL ON 3.1.1 WAS REVISED BUT |
| | A3.1.2 SHOWS FOAM BACKED TRIP (NOTE 5), A3.1.3 DOES NOT |
| | HAVE A DETAIL MARKER. CHECK ALL ELEVATION SHEETS AND |
| | REVISE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 1406.2.2. |
| | |
| | 51. SD1 SITE DATA, PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | DISTANCE FROM BUILDING TO STREET CENTERLINE TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602 (FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE |
| | FBC 702) FOR NORTH, EAST, SOUTH ELEVATIONS. |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS INFORMATION IS |
| | PROVIDED ON THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN. UNABLE TO LOCATE |
| | THIS INFORMATION ON THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN, A2.1.1 OR |
| | LIFE SAFETY PLAN, A0.1.1. PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE |
| | THIS INFORMATION CAN BE LOCATED. |
| | |
| | 52-54. OK |
| | |
| | 55. FBC 708.13.1, TRASH CHUTES, A7.9, FA AND OTHER |
| | SHEETS, DOORS TO BE SELF OR AUTOMATIC CLOSING. REVISE |
| | TO SHOW COMPLIANCE OR PROVIDE DATA SHEETS FOR PROPOSED |
| | TRASH CHUTE DOORS. |
| | 2ND REVIEW, DOORS FROM CORRIDOR ARE NOTED AS SELF |
| | CLOSING BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE NOTE FOR TRASH CHUTE DOOR. |
| | EITHER PROVIDE SPEC DATA OR REVISE DETAIL ON A7.9. |
| | |
| | 56-61. OK |
| | |
| | 62. SHEET A5.1.7, PLAN HAS OUTDATED CODE REFERENCES (13 |
| | C2.0, TABLE 13 C2.1.1) AND USES THE PHRASE RESIDENTIAL |
| | APPLICATIONS. FORMER CHAPTER 13 REFERENCES HAVE BEEN |
| | REPLACED BY FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION. SEE CHAPTER |
| | 2, ALTHOUGH THIS BUILDING HAS RESIDENTIAL SPACE IT IS |
| | NOT A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY DEFINITION DUE TO HEIGHT. |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PARTIALLY ADDRESSED; NOTES STILL MAKE |
| | REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 13 AND RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 63. ENERGY CALC PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR CORRECT OR |
| | COMPLETE. IT STATES THAT CONDITIONED AREA IS 251777 SF, |
| | CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED AREA IS THE SAME SQUARE |
| | FOOT AREA. SHEET A5.1.7 STATES THAT ALL EXTERIOR GLASS |
| | TO CLEAR AS PER ENERGY CALCULATIONS; SHEET A7.1 NOTE 18 |
| | ALSO REFERS TO ENERGY CALCS FOR R VALUE, BUT ENERGY |
| | CALC DOES NOT SPECIFY THESE ITEMS, PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE IS THAT THERE ARE NO UNCONDITIONED |
| | AREAS. PLEASE PROVIDE SOME CLARIFICATION; DOESN?T THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE, WHICH IS A PART OF THIS BUILDING, NEED |
| | TO BE INCLUDED? ALTHOUGH IT DOES NOT HAVE MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT IT SHOULD HAVE LIGHTING. FEEL FREE TO CONTACT |
| | ME IF YOU FEEL THAT I AM INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 64. OK |
| | |
| | 65. FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION 502, SEE SHEET 2 OF |
| | THE ENERGY CALC, DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE COMPLETE. FOR |
| | INSTANCE, EXTERNAL LIGHTING, NONE ENTERED. THE |
| | QUESTION: MET ALL REQUIRED COMPLIANCE FROM CHECK LIST? |
| | WAS NOT COMPLETED. PROJECT SUMMARY LACKS THE ADDRESS |
| | (SEE FBC 2010 EC 506.4.1). PLEASE REVISE/COMPLETE |
| | ENERGY CALCS. |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE |
| | COMPLETE: DOORS (NONE SHOWN, BUT OPAQUE DOORS SHOWN ON |
| | PLAN), FLOORS (ONLY AMENITY AREA SHOWN), WATER HEATER |
| | (ONE) SHOWS NOT CHECKED, EXTERNAL LIGHTING NONE, OTHER |
| | ITEMS. ALTHOUGH ENERGY CALCS APPEAR TO BE COMPLIANT, |
| | PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ARE COMPLETED. |
| | IF IT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CODE DOES NOT |
| | REQUIRE SOME OF THESE ITEMS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT YOUR |
| | CONVENIENCE TO DISCUSS. |
| | 66-69. OK |
| | |
| | 70-71. OK |
| | |
| | 72. A2.1.7, THERE APPEARS TO BE A 6INCH STEP FROM |
| | CORRIDORS 738 TO THE 7TH FLOOR AMENITIES. SEE FBC 2010 |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, FAIR HOUSING, REQUIREMENT 2, PUBLIC AND |
| | COMMON USE AREAS ARE TO BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. RESPONSE |
| | LETTER STATES THAT A CURB RAMP WILL BE INSTALLED IN |
| | THIS LOCATION. SEE FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY, THIS AREA |
| | DOES NOT APPEAR TO GRAPHICALLY DEPICT A CURB RAMP. A |
| | DETAIL SHOULD BE PROVIDED EITHER AT THIS TIME OR PRIOR |
| | TO CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 73-74. OK |
| | |
| | 75. 2ND REVIEW, SEE FIRE COMMENTS. CONFIRM LOCATION OF |
| | PANIC AS WELL AS SELF CLOSING HARDWARE. DOORS FOR |
| | AMENITY AREA NOT SHOWN, FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR. |
| | |
| | 76. OK |
| | |
| | 77. SD1, INTERIOR FINISHES NOT CLEAR FBC TABLE 803.9. |
| | THEY HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT NOW DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | TABLE. THE AMENITY AND BUSINESS AREAS HAVE DIFFERENT |
| | REQUIREMENT S THAN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. |
| | 78-83. OK. |
| | |
| | 84. OK |
| | |
| | 85-89. OK |
| | |
| | 90. PARKING GARAGE, PLEASE SEE FAIR HOUSING DESIGN |
| | MANUAL, 2.23, 2% OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR |
| | RESIDENTS, MINIMUM OF ONE AT SALES/RENTAL OFFICE, AND |
| | NOT CLEAR WHETHER GUEST PARKING IS PROVIDED. PLEASE |
| | REVISE PARKING DATA TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | 2ND REVIEW, GROUND FLOOR SHOWS 13 SPACES DESIGNATED AS |
| | VISITOR SPACES WITH ONE ACCESSIBLE SPACE. THE WORD |
| | VISITOR IMPLIES GUESTS OF THE RESIDENTS (FAIR HOUSING). |
| | WHERE IS THE PARKING FOR THE OFFICE STAFF AND NON |
| | RESIDENTS (ACCESSIBILITY)? PLEASE REWORD THE PARKING TO |
| | CLARIFY INTENT. PLANS AND NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES |
| | APPEAR COMPLIANT IF THIS AREA IS FOR OFFICE STAFF AND |
| | OFFICE VISITORS (NON RESIDENTS). |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 91. SEE FIRE COMMENT REGARDING GLAZING IN FIRE RATED |
| | WALLS. |
| | |
| | 92. SEE FIRE COMMENTS REGARDING EXIT SIGNS. |
