| Date |
Text |
| 2014-04-22 08:15:02 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) THE TRUSS PLACEMENT PLAN AND TRUSS DRAWING COVER |
| | SHEET THAT WERE SUBMITTED DO NOT HAVE THE ORIGINAL WET |
| | SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002 FOR DOCUMENTS THAT ARE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD. |
| | |
| | 2) THE TRUSS PLACEMENT PLAN IS TOO SMALL. CITY |
| | AMENDMENT 107.2.1.4 TO THE FBC REQUIRES PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | FOR RECORD TO BE A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE. |
| | |
| | 3) THE TRUSS PLACEMENT PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | THE ALTERNATE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. THERE ARE TWO |
| | DIFFERENT ROOF FRAMING PLANS SPECIFIED ON SHEET S-1 OF |
| | THE PLAN. THE FIRST ONE HAS A GABLE END AT THE BACK OF |
| | THE STRUCTURE AND THE ALTERNATE ONE HAS A HIP ROOF AT |
| | THE BACK. PLEASE SUBMIT BOTH TRUSS PACKAGES OR REVISE |
| | THE PLANS TO REMOVE THE GABLE OPTION. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE STRUCTURAL ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN AND THE TRUSS PLACEMENT PLAN AND TRUSS |
| | DRAWINGS THAT WAS NOTED ON THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW. THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ROOF PLANS SHOW THE HIP AND JACK TRUSSES AT |
| | THE FRONT BEARING ON THE FRONT WALL OF THE STRUCTURE |
| | AND THE TRUSS PLACEMENT PLAN AND TRUSS DRAWINGS HAVE |
| | THEM ATTACHED TO A HIP GIRDER TRUSS THAT WILL CARRY |
| | THIER LOAD AND TRANSFER IT TO THE SIDE WALLS. THE TRUSS |
| | ANCHORS SPECIFIED FOR THIS TRUSS ARE NOT ADEQUATE FOR |
| | THIS ADDITIONAL LOADING. THIS WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED |
| | BEFORE THE MASTER PERMIT CAN BE APPROVED. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBC R802.1.6.5 |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
