| Date |
Text |
| 2014-05-01 11:12:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE |
| | CONTRACTOR CONTACT: [email protected] |
| | ARCHITECT: MSA ARCHITECTS, INC., JOSE I. SAUMELL |
| | ENGINEER: BBM STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, JOEL R. |
| | MIDDLEBROOKS PE |
| | CONTACT: NEYITA LEIVA, LICENSE & PERMIT SERVICES: |
| | NEYITALPS01.NET 561-856-6655 |
| | |
| | 1. PROVISO - PER APPLICANT, SCOPE OF THIS FOUNDATION |
| | PERMIT IS LIMITED TO VIBROCOMPACTION, BELOW GRADE |
| | FOUNDATIONS, AND WATER, SEWER AND STORM PIPING. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVISO - PER APPLICANT, PLAT PLAN HAS BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 3-8. OK |
| | |
| | 9. SEE THRESHOLD PLAN REVIEW - THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR |
| | TO PERMIT ISSUANCE PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553. |
| | |
| | SHEETS S0.5 AND 0.6 (THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN) FROM |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT ARE IN REVIEW. PLEASE INCLUDE IN |
| | THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 10. PROVISO - FBC 110.7 IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. PER |
| | MANNY GONZALEZ, A POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN HAS BEEN |
| | FILED WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | 11. COMMENT FROM REVIEW #1: FBC 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS |
| | FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A |
| | STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR |
| | ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE FIRE SAFETY STANDARDS AS |
| | DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | THIS SECTION AND 633 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS DULY |
| | NOTED BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE STATEMENT ON THE |
| | PLANS (REQUIRED TO BE STATED BY THE ARCHITECT AND BY |
| | THE ENGINEER). |
| | |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE FLORIDA STATUTE 553.79(7) (D): |
| | ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE |
| | ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM |
| | BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY STANDARDS |
| | AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHICH SHEET THIS STATEMENT CAN BE |
| | LOCATED, OR ADD TO AT LEAST ONE ARCHITECTURAL AND ONE |
| | STRUCTURAL SHEET. THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 12-13. OK |
| | |
| | 14. PROVISO - INFORMATIONAL SHEETS NOT RELATED TO |
| | FOUNDATION HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | 15-16. OK |
| | |
| | 17. COMMENT FROM REVIEW #1: REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE WIND |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA FBC1603.1.4. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE IS THAT THIS IS INCLUDED ON THE BUILDING PLAN. |
| | THE MASTER HAS NOT YET BEEN ISSUED AND IS STILL IN |
| | REVIEW; THEREFORE IS NOT A PART OF THE PUBLIC |
| | RECORD/PERMIT DOCUMENT. FOR THIS FOUNDATION PERMIT |
| | BEING REQUESTED, PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE WIND |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY FBC 1603.1.4. IF THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FEELS THAT WIND DESIGN CRITERIA IS |
| | NOT RELEVANT TO THE FOUNDATION DESIGN, PLEASE HAVE HIM |
| | CALL ME TO DISCUSS. |
| | |
| | 18. COMMENT FROM REVIEW #1: PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION |
| | FOR THE PILES : TYPE, SIZE, ETC., FBC 107. |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PILES ARE NOT TO BE INSTALLED PER RESPONSE |
| | LETTER AND PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. SEE S5.1, TYPICAL |
| | CONCRETE COLUMN. THIS DETAIL SHOWS A PILE CAP, PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY OR REMOVE FROM DETAIL. |
| | |
