| Date |
Text |
| 2014-08-16 16:31:10 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. AN APPLICATION FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING SITE |
| | LIGHTING WAS SUBMITTED. NO STRUCTURAL PLAN WAS |
| | PROVIDED, FBC 107. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL |
| | DETAIL FOR THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION AND WIND DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA FBC1603.1.4. |
| | |
| | INFORMATION REGARDING THE ORIGINAL INSTALLATION CAN BE |
| | FOUND ON SHEET E2.1 (AND OTHER SHEETS) IN THE PLANS FOR |
| | 06090691. IF YOU NEED ACCESS TO THESE (OR OTHER) PLANS, |
| | PLEASE CONTACT [email protected] OR [email protected] |
| | (RECORDS RESEARCH REQUEST). |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW: |
| | |
| | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED ARE CONFUSING. |
| | |
| | ELECTRICAL ENGINEER STATES ON SHEET E5.1: "DETAIL WAS |
| | RECOVERED FROM INITIAL BUILDING PROJECT. ALL EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHOULD STILL APPLY." THE |
| | ORIGINAL BUILDING WAS DESIGNED |
| | |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER STATES IN A LETTER: "THE DESIGN |
| | WIND CRITERIA FOR THE FACILITY IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. DESIGN |
| | WIND SPEED 170MPH. 2. WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY: C." |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL BUILDING WAS DESIGNED AS EXPOSURE B (SEE SHEET |
| | S2.1 OF ORIGINAL BUILDING PLAN). THE DEFINITION OF |
| | EXPOSURES B AND C HAVE CHANGED SINCE FBC 2004. THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DOES NOT REFER TO THE LIGHT POLE OR |
| | LIGHT POLE FIXTURES, AND DOES NOT REFER TO SHEET E5, |
| | NOR IS THERE ANY INDICATION THAT HE HAS REVIEWED THAT |
| | DETAIL. ASSUMPTION THAT THE PREVIOUS INSTALLATION |
| | COMPLIES WITH CURRENT CODE IS NOT NECESSARILY A CORRECT |
| | ASSUMPTION. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR PROPOSED RELOCATION OF LIGHT |
| | POLE AND FOR PROPOSED RELOCATED (OR NEW) FIXTURES, FBC |
| | 1609. |
