Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 14020232
Permit Number 14020232
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2014-04-09 17:23:59****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO SCOPE AND LOCATION OF
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. THE PLAN PROVIDED DOES NOT
 INDICATE WHAT IS EXISTING AND WHAT IS PROPOSED, FBC
 107. APPLICATION STATES THAT A TRENCH WILL BE CUT AND
 POURED BACK. IT APPEARS THAT MORE WORK THAN THAT WILL
 BE DONE. STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR TRENCH INFILL NOT
 PROVIDED.
  
 SCOPE NOT CLEAR. PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTE 471.003. IT
 DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THIS WORK FALLS UNDER ANY OF THE
 EXEMPTIONS TO ENGINEERING. HAVE AN ENGINEER PROVIDE A
 STRUCTURAL PLAN, SEE FBC 107 FOR MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW
 CRITERIA.
  
 2. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE STRUCTURE WILL BE AFFECTED
 BY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. SEE FBC 107.2.1:
  
 ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS,SPECIFICATIONS AND
 ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF
 THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. (SEE ALSO
 SECTION 107.3.5).
  
 CALCULATIONS OR PLANS PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 3. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS, PROFIT,
 OVERHEAD. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN FOR PROPOSED WORK
 INCLUDING INSTALLED EQUIPMENT.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 A COPY OF AN ENGINEERED PLAN WAS SUBMITTED. IT APPEARS
 THAT WORK WILL BE DONE ON EACH SIDE. DIMENSIONS NOT
 PROVIDED. SITE PLAN SHOULD CORRELATE WITH THE
 STRUCTURAL PLAN, FBC 107.
  
 NUMEROUS ISOMETRICS WERE SUBMITTED; NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS
 IS. SEE FBC 107 FOR MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA.
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved