| Date |
Text |
| 2014-02-21 15:08:30 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PARKING AREAS |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED FOR THE OPENING OF THE OUTLETS |
| | INCLUDES MORE AREAS AROUND BUILDINGS E, F AND H THAN IS |
| | SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE FULL EXTENT OF THE |
| | PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE THAT IS ADJACENT TO OPEN PARKING |
| | FIELDS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS A TREE SHOWN IN THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO |
| | THE POLICE/FIRE PARKING SPACES EAST OF BUILDING J-5. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PLANS SHALL BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE BUILDING J |
| | ENTRY FOUNTAIN AND THE EQUIPMENT VAULT. ALL FOUNTAIN |
| | EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, SHALL BE |
| | SCREENED. |
| | |
| | 4) THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SHOW GROUND COVER AND |
| | TREES IN THE LANDSCAPED ISLAND WEST OF THE VALET STAND. |
| | STAFF IS NOT APPROVING THE LATEST REVISION TO REMOVE |
| | THIS LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | 5) THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SHOW PALM TREES |
| | FLANKING THE CONGRESS AVENUE ENTRY DRIVE. STAFF IS NOT |
| | APPROVING THE LATEST REVISION TO REMOVE THE ENTRY PALM |
| | TREES. |
| | |
| | 6) THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SHOW A HEDGE NOT |
| | CONTINUING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE NORTHERN PROPERTY |
| | LINE ALONG THE WALL (SHEET LP-3). THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE A HEDGE IN THE BUFFER. |
| | STAFF IS NOT APPROVING THE LATEST REVISION TO REMOVE |
| | THE HEDGE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE REMOVAL OF THE GROUND COVER IN THE OPEN AREA |
| | EAST OF BUILDING J-6 REDUCES THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE |
| | OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING SOMETHING |
| | OTHER THAN SOD AS UNDERSTORY TO THE TREES PROVIDES |
| | CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 8) THE REMOVAL OF THE PALM TREES WITHIN THE FOUNDATION |
| | PLANTING OF BUILDING J-2 AND THE EAST SIDE OF BUILDING |
| | J-5 REDUCES THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT. |
| | PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN PALM |
| | TREES TO SOFTEN THE HARD EDGE OF THE BUILDING FACADE |
| | AND TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 9) THE REMOVAL OF THE PALM TREES AND GROUND COVER FROM |
| | THE FIRST MEDIAN ISLAND WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH |
| | LAKES BOULEVARD VIA ENTRANCE A REDUCES THE AESTHETIC |
| | APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING |
| | THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN PALM TREES AND GROUND COVER. |
| | |
| | 10) THE REMOVAL OF THE GROUND COVER FROM THE SECOND |
| | MEDIAN ISLAND WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | BOULEVARD VIA ENTRANCE A REDUCES THE AESTHETIC |
| | APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING |
| | THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN GROUND COVER. |
| | |
| | 11) THE REMOVAL OF THE GROUND COVER FROM THE FIRST |
| | MEDIAN ISLAND WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | BOULEVARD VIA ENTRANCE C REDUCES THE AESTHETIC |
| | APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING |
| | THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN GROUND COVER. |
| | |
| | 12) PLEASE INCLUDE THE NAMES OF TREES "FB" AND "BB" IN |
| | THE EXISTING TREE LEGEND (SHOWN IN NORTH BUFFER SHEET |
| | LP-3). |
| | |
| | 13) ONE OF THE CRI TAGS DOES NOT POINT TO THE CORRECT |
| | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL FOR THE BUILDING J-2 FOUNDATION |
| | PLANTING. |
| | |
| | 14) THE GAP BETWEEN TREES IN THE BUFFER AT THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE IS GREATER THAN 30 FEET. |
| | THIS IS ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO THE |
| | NORTH WHERE THE TREE SPACING HELPS BLOCK THE LONG |
| | EXPANSE OF THE WALL. |
| | |
| | 15) SHEET LP-7 CALLS OUT 7 RELOCATED ROYAL PALM TREES |
| | ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD. ONLY 6 ARE SHOWN. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT PLANS AND PROVIDE WHERE THE EXTRA |
| | RELOCATED ROYAL PALM TREE WAS INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 16) BUFFER CALCULATIONS: |
| | |
| | A. CONGRESS BUFFER STATES 54 TREES PROVIDED, YET ONLY |
| | 53 TREES WHEN TOTALING THE DATA. STAFF HAS NOTED THAT |
| | THE PERMIT SET DOES NOT MATCH PREVIOUS PLAN SETS ALONG |
| | THIS BUFFER. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE TREE COUNTS ARE |
| | STILL ACCURATE. |
| | B. PALM BEACH LAKES BUFFER STATES 10 EXISTING TREES. |
| | WERE THE TREES THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO REMAIN BUT |
| | ACCIDENTALLY REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION FACTORED INTO |
| | THE COUNT OF 10? |
| | C. PALM BEACH LAKES BUFFER STATES 7 RELOCATED ROYAL |
| | PALM TREES YET ONLY 6 ARE SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 17) LIVE OAK TREES ARE SHOWN IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO GAS |
| | LINES, FIRE LINES, EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, THE 50 FOOT |
| | DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ETC. PLEASE VERIFY THAT ROOT |
| | BARRIERS WERE INSTALLED WITH THESE TREES. |
| | |
| | 18) PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE TREE AND SHRUB TYPES AND |
| | COUNTS ARGEE WITH THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENTS. THE COVER |
| | SHEET WITH THIS PERMIT SHOWS DIFFERENT SPECIES AND |
| | NUMBERS THAN THE LAST LANDSCAPE PLAN SUMITTED AND THE |
| | LAST LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
