| Date |
Text |
| 2014-01-21 09:47:31 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) THE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED INDICATE THAT THERE IS |
| | AN INCREASE IN THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF WORK. SPECIFY THE |
| | INCREASED VALUE FOR THE ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK. NOTE: |
| | THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF WORK WAS TO REMOVE AND REPLACE |
| | WATER DAMAGED FLOOR COVERING, DRYWALL, TILE BACKER AND |
| | TILE IN THE ROOMS SPECIFIED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK LETTER |
| | FROM J.B. KERN. |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE GLASS |
| | BLOCK THAT WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE FIRST FLOOR BATH. |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | NEW WINDOW THAT WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE NEW WINDOW |
| | OPENING SHOWN ON ELEVATION 4 ON SHEET A-1. IF MULTIPLE |
| | WINDOW AND GLASS TYPES ARE SHOWN IN THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL, MARK THE ONE THAT WILL BE USED. DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | IMPACT PROTECTION FOR THE NEW GLAZED OPENINGS. FBC |
| | R301.2.1.2 AND DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 5) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR |
| | THE PROJECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | NOTE: THIS REVISION WILL NEED TO BE RESUBMITTTED UNDER |
| | THE SAME REVISION NUMBER. ADDITIONAL FEES WILL BE |
| | CHARGED. EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE COUNTED AS A |
| | REVISED PAGE. IN ORDER TO SPEED THE PLAN REVIEW |
| | PROCESS, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW |
| | EACH OF THE REVIEW ITEMS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
