| Date |
Text |
| 2014-01-10 07:44:51 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | REVISION IS DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET F.01 FOR THE THE CONCRETE BLOCK AND WOOD FENCE |
| | CAN NOT BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION. A SEPARATE PERMIT, |
| | APPLICATION AND REVIEW IS REQUIRED FOR FENCE PERMITS. |
| | NOTE: STRUCTURAL DETAILS SHOWING THE SIZE AND LOCATION |
| | OF VERTICAL REINFORCING STEEL IN THE FILLED CELLS AND |
| | THE HORIZONTAL REINFORCING STEEL IN THE TIE BEAM WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET T.01 IS LABELED FLOOR ROOF |
| | PLAN. IT APPEARS TO BE A ROOF FRAMING PLAN. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) HETA 20 CONNECTORS ARE SPECIFIED IN THE DETAIL FOR |
| | ANCHORING THE EXISTING (C) TRUSSES TO THE CBS WALL AND |
| | AT THE WALL ON THE WOOD BEAM DETAIL (B). THIS IS AN |
| | EMBED ANCHOR DESIGNED TO ANCHOR ROOF TRUSSES TO THE TOP |
| | OF A TIE BEAM AND CAN NOT BE USED TO SUPPORT THE |
| | VERTICAL GRAVITY LOADS OF THE TRUSSES. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | FBC R801.2 |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS., SPAN |
| | AND LOAD TABLES FOR THE LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER BEAMS |
| | THAT ARE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. FBC R801.2 |
| | |
| | 5) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS FOR THE EXISTING 2 X 4 WOOD |
| | FRAME CEILING THAT ARE SHOWN IN THE CONNECTOR TO |
| | TRUSSES (A) DETAIL. THESE APPEAR TO BE TRUSS HANGER |
| | THAT IS HANGING BELOW THE BOTTOM CORD OF THE TRUSS IN A |
| | APPLICATION FOR WHICH IT WAS NOT DESIGNED. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED TO ANCHOR |
| | THE LVL BEAMS TO THE EXISTING WALLS. FBC R801.2 |
| | |
| | 7) SPECIFY THE TYPE AND LOCATION OF ALL CONNECTORS, THE |
| | TYPE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS THAT WILL BE USED FOR EACH |
| | APPLICATION AND THE REQUIRED UPLIFT OR GRAVITY LOAD |
| | DESIGN AT EACH LOCATION. FBC R802.1.9 |
| | |
| | 8) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR EACH |
| | CONNECTOR SPECIFIED OR PROVIDE AN ANCHOR SCHEDULE WITH |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFIED FOR EACH CONNECTOR. DCA |
| | RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 9) THE ORIGINAL PERMIT DID NOT INCLUDE THE COSTS OF THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ROOF REPAIRS SHOWN IN THE REVISED DRAWINGS. |
| | PLEASE SPECIFY THE INCREASE IN VALUE OF WORK ON THE |
| | REVISION FORM WHEN THIS REVISION IS RE-SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
