| Date |
Text |
| 2013-12-17 16:04:09 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) THE ENGINEER NEEDS TO EVALUATE THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN |
| | SPECIFIED AT THE EXTERIOR WALL FOR THE 8 X 12 CONCRETE |
| | BEAM WITH (4) # 4 BARS SHOWN IN SECTION A - A ON SHEET |
| | 3 AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. THE PLANS SHOW 2 FILLED |
| | CONCRETE BLOCK AT THE EXTERIOR WALL RATHER THAN A |
| | FORMED AND POURED CONCRETE COLUMN LIKE THE ONE ON THE |
| | OTHER END. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3 NOTE: RATHER THAN |
| | HAVE A BEAM BELOW THE CEILING, THIS BEAM COULD BE |
| | ELIMINATED BY USING ROOF GIRDER TRUSSES TO HANG THE |
| | EXISTING AND NEW TRUSSES ON. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RATED EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS |
| | DO NOT HAVE THE DBPR APPROVED INSTALLATION AND |
| | EVALUATION INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THE FLORIDA FL# |
| | COVER-SHEETS. THEY ALL HAVE MIAMI-DADE NOAS AS THEIR |
| | APPROVED INFORMATION. THIS IS THE LINK TO THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WEB SITE WHERE YOU CAN PRINT OUT THE |
| | APPROVED INFORMATION THAT IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED |
| | BY DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | HTTP://FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_APP_SRCH.ASPX |
| | |
| | 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | ROOTING MATERIAL THAT WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE FLAT |
| | ROOF. SUBMIT TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING AT THE PERIMETER |
| | AND CORNER ROOF AREAS IF THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR THE SELECTED SYSTEM FROM THE PRODUCT APPROVAL ARE |
| | NOT ADEQUATE FOR THESE AREAS. FBC R301.2.1. |
| | |
| | 4) SPECIFY THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT FROM THE ROOF TILE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WILL BE USED TO INSTALL IT AND |
| | RESIST THE REQUIRED OVERTURN MOMENT. IF A ROOF TILE |
| | ADHESIVE WILL BE USED SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF IT'S PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | 5) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | STRUCTURAL WINDOW MULLIONS AND THE SIMPSON CONNECTORS |
| | THAT WILL BE USED AND THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE ICC-ES EVALUATION REPORT |
| | FOR THE ICYNENE SPRAY FOAM INSULATION. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.2.1.3 |
| | |
| | 7) THE PLANS SPECIFY A 4' 0" X 6' 8" EXTERIOR SLIDING |
| | GLASS DOOR AT THE LAUNDRY. THIS IS NOT A STANDARD SIZE |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND WOULD PROVIDE AN OPENING LESS |
| | THAN 2 FEET WIDE. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THIS IS YOUR |
| | INTENT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 THE SMALLEST SGD WIDTH |
| | ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS 5 FEET. |
| | |
| | 8) TWO SETS OF PLANS ARE REQUIRED PER CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.1. ONLY ONE ROOF FRAMING PLAN WAS SUBMITTED. SUBMIT |
| | AN ADDITIONAL PLAN SHEET T-1. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
